Fog Computing: Focusing on Mobile Users at the Edge
Open accessAbstract
With smart devices, particular smartphones, becoming our everyday companions, the ubiquitous mobile Internet and computing applications pervade people daily lives. With the surge demand on high-quality mobile services at anywhere, how to address the ubiquitous user demand and accommodate the explosive growth of mobile traffics is the key issue of the next generation mobile networks. The Fog computing is a promising solution towards this goal. Fog computing extends cloud computing by providing virtualized resources and engaged location-based services to the edge of the mobile networks so as to better serve mobile traffics. Therefore, Fog computing is a lubricant of the combination of cloud computing and mobile applications. In this article, we outline the main features of Fog computing and describe its concept, architecture and design goals. Lastly, we discuss some of the future research issues from the networking perspective.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The key objective of Edge Computing is to put resources close to users and data sources to help overcome cloud computing's high latency, jitter, and narrow bandwidth.
“The key objective of Edge Computing is to put resources within close proximity to the users and sources of data and information to help overcome cloud computing's recognized weaknesses of high latency, jitter and narrow bandwidth [11,52].”
From Edge AI: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [52]
The Introduction (p. 2) describes placing fog resources near mobile users to replace a long, thin cloud connection, and “Why Fog?” (p. 4) reports reduced latency and higher data rates. The paper treats fog as an edge-computing platform (Computing, p. 7), but these passages focus on mobile users rather than data sources and do not identify jitter as a cloud weakness. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMEC and fog computing have subsequently been completely mixed and matched by various authors.
“This was unfortunate because confusion with Fog Computing was made possible and MEC and Fog Computing have subsequently been completely “mixed and matched” by various authors [52,112,135,136].”
From Edge AI: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [52]
The Introduction (p. 2) describes mobile edge computing as a system similar to fog computing and says fog computing lacks a standardized definition. It does not say that various authors subsequently used the two terms interchangeably or “mixed and matched” them completely. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMEC is far more likely to be used in informational contexts.
“Far more likely is the use of MEC in informational contexts [52].”
From Edge AI: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [52]
The Introduction (p. 2) describes mobile edge computing as a system similar to fog computing, and Section III (p. 4) characterizes fog services as localized information services. The paper does not establish that MEC is far more likely to be used in informational contexts than in other contexts; it also describes computing and real-time data processing applications (Storage, p. 6). (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredGrey areas in Edge Computing definitions have allowed overlapping views that over-claim for particular paradigms; for example, one source defines Edge Computing too narrowly as connected embedded computing for the Industrial Internet of Things, while another brings all mobile users into Fog Computing.
“These grey areas have allowed overlapping views that over-claim for particular paradigms; for example [221], defines Edge Computing too narrowly: “connected embedded computing for the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT)” while [52] brings all mobile users into FC.”
From Edge AI: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [52]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The case for vm-based cloudlets in mobile computing
Satyanarayanan, M., Bahl, P., Caceres, R., & Davies, N. (2009) · IEEE Pervasive Computing · doi:10.1109/mprv.2009.82 · Cited by 3,660 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- [2][2] F. Bonomi, R. Milito, J. Zhu, and S. Addepalli, 'Fog Computing and Its Role in the Internet of Things,' in Proceedings of ACM MCC , 2012, pp. 13-16. -
- [3][3] R. Balan, J. Flinn, M. Satyanarayanan, S. Sinnamohideen, and H. I. Yang, 'The Case for Cyber Foraging,' in Proceedings of ACM SIGOPS , 2002, pp. 87-92. -
- [7][7] E. Bas ¸tu˘ g, M. Bennis, and M. Debbah, 'Living on the Edge: The Role of Proactive Caching in 5G Wireless Networks,' IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 52, pp. 82 - 89, 2014. -
- [9][9] T. H. Luan, L. X. Cai, J. Chen, X. Shen, and F. Bai, 'VTube: Towards the Media Rich City Life with Autonomous Vehicular Content Distribution,' in Proceedings of IEEE SECON , 2011, pp. 359-367. -
- [10][10] G. Peng, 'CDN: Content Distribution Network,' arXiv preprint cs/0411069 , 2004. - · arXiv
- [11][11] B. Ahlgren, C. Dannewitz, C. Imbrenda, D. Kutscher, and B. Ohlman, 'A Survey of Information-Centric Networking,' IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 26-36, 2012. -
- [12][12] M. Satyanarayanan, Z. Chen, K. Ha, W. Hu, W. Richter, and P. Pillai, 'Cloudlets: at the Leading Edge of Mobile-Cloud Convergence,' in Proceedings of MobiCASE , 2014. -
- [13][13] Y. Zhang and Y. Zhou, 'Transparent Computing: a New Paradigm for Pervasive Computing,' in Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing , 2006, pp. 1-11. -
- [14][14] C. Meurisch, A. Seeliger, B. Schmidt, I. Schweizer, F. Kaup, and M. M¨ uhlh¨ auser, 'Upgrading Wireless Home Routers for Enabling Large-scale Deployment of Cloudlets,' in Mobile Computing, Applications, and Services . Springer, 2015, pp. 12-29. -
- [15][15] D. Kreutz, F. M. V. Ramos, P. E. Verissimo, C. E. Rothenberg, S. Azodolmolky, and S. Uhlig, 'Software-defined Networking: A Comprehensive Survey,' Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 14-76, 2015.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey on Mobile Edge Computing: The Communication Perspective
Mao, Y., You, C., Zhang, J., Huang, K., & Letaief, K. B. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2745201 · Cited by 5,607 · see citing works
Mobile Edge Computing: A Survey
Abbas, N., Zhang, Y., Taherkordi, A., & Skeie, T. (2018) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2017.2750180 · Cited by 2,474 · see citing works
Securing Fog Computing for Internet of Things Applications: Challenges and Solutions
Ni, J., Zhang, K., Lin, X., & Shen, X. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2762345 · Cited by 659 · see citing works
A Review of Machine Learning and IoT in Smart Transportation
Zantalis, F., Koulouras, G., Karabetsos, S., & Kandris, D. (2019) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi11040094 · Cited by 625 · see citing works
Singh, R., & Gill, S. S. (2023) · Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems · doi:10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.02.004 · Cited by 572 · see citing works
Verma, S., Kawamoto, Y., Fadlullah, Z. M., Nishiyama, H., & Kato, N. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2694469 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Big data reduction framework for value creation in sustainable enterprises
Rehman, M. H. U., Chang, V., Batool, A., & Wah, T. Y. (2016) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.05.013 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Ahmad, S., Shakeel, I., Mehfuz, S., & Ahmad, J. (2023) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2023.100568 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Klonoff, D. C. (2017) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296817717007 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Real-Time Data Processing Architecture for Multi-Robots Based on Differential Federated Learning
Zhou, W., Li, Y., Chen, S., & Ding, B. (2018) · 2018 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing & Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI) · doi:10.1109/smartworld.2018.00106 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Luan, T. H., Gao, L., Li, Z., Xiang, Y., Wei, G., & Sun, L.
- Affiliations
- Deakin University (AU)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2015
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1502.01815
- OpenAlex
- W1486457878
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 9
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Caching and Content Delivery
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
- Keywords
- fog computing, edge computing, cellular networks, mobile data traffic, cloud computing, location-based services, fog computing architecture, next generation mobile networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
