The DOI matches its DataCite record; 15 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Large-scale Simple Question Answering with Memory Networks
Open accessAbstract
Training large-scale question answering systems is complicated because training sources usually cover a small portion of the range of possible questions. This paper studies the impact of multitask and transfer learning for simple question answering; a setting for which the reasoning required to answer is quite easy, as long as one can retrieve the correct evidence given a question, which can be difficult in large-scale conditions. To this end, we introduce a new dataset of 100k questions that we use in conjunction with existing benchmarks. We conduct our study within the framework of Memory Networks (Weston et al., 2015) because this perspective allows us to eventually scale up to more complex reasoning, and show that Memory Networks can be successfully trained to achieve excellent performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In SimpleQuestions (Bordes et al., 2015), some questions have corresponding single relations in Freebase but need to be expressed using multiple relations in DBpedia.”
From Implicit Relation Linking for Question Answering over Knowledge Graph (2022) · cites this paper as Bordes et al., 2015
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hogwild: A Lock-Free Approach to Parallelizing Stochastic Gradient Descent
Niu, F., Recht, B., Re, C., & Wright, S. J. (2011) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1106.5730 · Cited by 1,211
Identifying Relations for Open Information Extraction
Fader, A., Soderland, S., & Etzioni, O. (2011) · Cited by 1,139
Question Answering with Subgraph Embeddings
Bordes, A., Chopra, S., & Weston, J. (2014) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1067 · Cited by 651
Self-citationInformation Extraction over Structured Data: Question Answering with Freebase
Yao, X., & Durme, B. V. (2014) · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-1090 · Cited by 513
Semantic Parsing via Paraphrasing
Berant, J., & Liang, P. (2014) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-1133 · Cited by 504
Template-based question answering over RDF data
Unger, C., Bühmann, L., Lehmann, J., Ngomo, A.-C. N., Gerber, D., & Cimiano, P. (2012) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2187836.2187923 · Cited by 500
Large scale image annotation: learning to rank with joint word-image embeddings
Weston, J., Samy Bengio, A., & Usunier, N. (2010) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-010-5198-3 · Cited by 400
Self-citationOpen Question Answering with Weakly Supervised Embedding Models
Bordes, A., Weston, J., & Usunier, N. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44848-9_11 · Cited by 358
Self-citationParaphrase-Driven Learning for Open Question Answering
Fader, A., Zettlemoyer, L., & Etzioni, O. (2013) · Cited by 329
Dumais, S., Banko, M., Brill, E., Lin, J., & Ng, A. Y. (2002) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/564376.564428 · Cited by 289
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–529 of 529
Exploiting Rich Syntax for Better Knowledge Base Question AnsweringPreprint
Zhang, P., Jia, Y., Zhu, M., Chen, W., & Zhang, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.07940
Chapitre 8. Former les machines à la compréhension du langage naturel
Bordes, A. (2021) · EDP Sciences eBooks · doi:10.1051/978-2-7598-2544-8.c012
Self-citationCase-based Reasoning for Natural Language Queries over Knowledge BasesPreprint
Das, R., Zaheer, M., Thai, D., Godbole, A., Perez, E., Lee, J. Y., Tan, L., Polymenakos, L., & McCallum, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.08762 · Cited by 34
End-to-End Entity Resolution and Question Answering Using Differentiable Knowledge GraphsPreprint
Oliya, A., Saffari, A., Sen, P., & Ayoola, T. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.05817
Gomes, J., de Mello, R. C., dos Reis, A. B. K., Ströele, V., & de Souza, J. F. (2021) · Simpósio Brasileiro de Tecnologia da Informação e da Linguagem Humana (STIL) · doi:10.5753/stil.2021.17808
Probing Simple Factoid Question Answering Based on Linguistic Knowledge
Han, N., Noji, H., Hayashi, K., Takamura, H., & Miyao, Y. (2021) · Journal of Natural Language Processing · doi:10.5715/jnlp.28.938
Asadifar, S., Kahani, M., & Shekarpour, S. (2022) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.846
Les signatures neurobiologiques de la conscience
Sciences, A. E. I. D. (2021) · EDP Sciences eBooks · doi:10.1051/978-2-7598-2612-4
An Execution Cost Model for Aggregate Queries over Knowledge Graphs
Fu, T., Xu, X., & Wang, Y. (2022) · International Conference on Advanced Cloud and Big Data · doi:10.1109/cbd54617.2021.00028
MilKBQA: A Complex Knowledge Base Question Answering Dataset on Chinese Military Field
Xu, P., Li, T., Huang, Z., Guo, M., He, J., & Sun, D. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Data Science in Cyberspace · doi:10.1109/dsc53577.2021.00026
Meta-learning for natural language processing
Zou, L. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-89931-4.00005-5
Momtazi, S., & Abbasiantaeb, Z. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16552-8_3
A Document Retrieval Method based on Knowledge Map
Cheng, S., Wang, S., Luo, C., & Chen, R. (2022) · International Conference on Machine Learning, Cloud Computing and Intelligent Mining (MLCCIM) · doi:10.1109/mlccim55934.2022.00042
Question Answering over Knowledge Base with Variational Auto-Encoder
Japa, S. S., & Green, S. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Big Data · doi:10.1109/bigmm55396.2022.00012 · Cited by 1
Mutiarawati, R., Najmillah, A. N., & Lestari, Z. W. (2022) · Journal of English Education and Teaching · doi:10.33369/jeet.6.4.598-609
An Effective Simple Question Answering Framework using Knowledge Graph EmbeddingPreprint
Chen, J., Fan, Y., Zhou, T., Li, L., & Huang, H. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2605517/v1
Entity Level QA Pairs Dataset for Sentiment Analysis
Lahiri, A. K., & Hu, Q. (2022) · IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT) · doi:10.1109/wi-iat55865.2022.00046
A Multi-View Information Fusion Relation Detection Model Based on Self-Attention for KbqaPreprint
Tong, G., Hu, Q., Yang, P., & Gao, L. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4605360
Multi-attentive question answering over knowledge base
Zeng, Z. (2023) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.244138
Factoid Question Answering System using Knowledge Graph
Gaikwad, V. V., & Patil, A. (2023) · International Conference on Computing Communication Control and automation · doi:10.1109/iccubea58933.2023.10392192
A Review on Question Answering System over Knowledge GraphPreprint
Choudhury, B., & Deka, V. (2024) · doi:10.22541/au.171618466.63003321/v1
Luo, M., Gokhale, T., Varshney, N., Yang, Y., & Baral, C. R. (2024) · Synthesis lectures on computer vision · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-57816-8_6
AraFastQA: a transformer model for question-answering for Arabic language using few-shot learning
Alrayzah, A., Alsolami, F., & Saleh, M. (2025) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2025.101857 · Cited by 2
The Wikidata Query Logs Dataset
Walter, S., & Bast, H. (2026) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3805712.3808612
Neurosymbolic Large Language Models: A Survey of Symbolic Integration, Reasoning and Explainability
Rani, M., Mishra, B. K., & Thakker, D. (2026) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-026-10794-4 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Bordes, A., Usunier, N., Chopra, S., & Weston, J.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2015
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1506.02075
- OpenAlex
- W580074167
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 10
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- memory networks, multi-task learning, transfer learning, evidence retrieval, question answering dataset, question answering benchmark
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
