The DOI matches its DataCite record; 15 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Large-scale Simple Question Answering with Memory Networks
Open accessAbstract
Training large-scale question answering systems is complicated because training sources usually cover a small portion of the range of possible questions. This paper studies the impact of multitask and transfer learning for simple question answering; a setting for which the reasoning required to answer is quite easy, as long as one can retrieve the correct evidence given a question, which can be difficult in large-scale conditions. To this end, we introduce a new dataset of 100k questions that we use in conjunction with existing benchmarks. We conduct our study within the framework of Memory Networks (Weston et al., 2015) because this perspective allows us to eventually scale up to more complex reasoning, and show that Memory Networks can be successfully trained to achieve excellent performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In SimpleQuestions (Bordes et al., 2015), some questions have corresponding single relations in Freebase but need to be expressed using multiple relations in DBpedia.”
From Implicit Relation Linking for Question Answering over Knowledge Graph (2022) · cites this paper as Bordes et al., 2015
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hogwild: A Lock-Free Approach to Parallelizing Stochastic Gradient Descent
Niu, F., Recht, B., Re, C., & Wright, S. J. (2011) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1106.5730 · Cited by 1,211
Identifying Relations for Open Information Extraction
Fader, A., Soderland, S., & Etzioni, O. (2011) · Cited by 1,139
Question Answering with Subgraph Embeddings
Bordes, A., Chopra, S., & Weston, J. (2014) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1067 · Cited by 651
Self-citationInformation Extraction over Structured Data: Question Answering with Freebase
Yao, X., & Durme, B. V. (2014) · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-1090 · Cited by 513
Semantic Parsing via Paraphrasing
Berant, J., & Liang, P. (2014) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-1133 · Cited by 504
Template-based question answering over RDF data
Unger, C., Bühmann, L., Lehmann, J., Ngomo, A.-C. N., Gerber, D., & Cimiano, P. (2012) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2187836.2187923 · Cited by 500
Large scale image annotation: learning to rank with joint word-image embeddings
Weston, J., Samy Bengio, A., & Usunier, N. (2010) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-010-5198-3 · Cited by 400
Self-citationOpen Question Answering with Weakly Supervised Embedding Models
Bordes, A., Weston, J., & Usunier, N. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44848-9_11 · Cited by 358
Self-citationParaphrase-Driven Learning for Open Question Answering
Fader, A., Zettlemoyer, L., & Etzioni, O. (2013) · Cited by 329
Dumais, S., Banko, M., Brill, E., Lin, J., & Ng, A. Y. (2002) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/564376.564428 · Cited by 289
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition, and Applications
Ji, S., Pan, S., Cambria, E., Marttinen, P., & Yu, P. S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2021.3070843 · Cited by 2,947
TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehension
Joshi, M., Choi, E., Weld, D., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2017) · Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-1147 · Cited by 1,690
Reading Wikipedia to answer open-domain questions
Chen, D., Fisch, A., Weston, J., & Bordes, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-1171 · Cited by 1,546
Self-citation(2016) · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1147 · Cited by 1,035
Self-citationCoQA: A Conversational Question Answering Challenge
Reddy, S., Chen, D., & Manning, C. D. (2019) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00266 · Cited by 975
Metadata
- Authors
- Bordes, A., Usunier, N., Chopra, S., & Weston, J.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2015
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1506.02075
- OpenAlex
- W580074167
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 10
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- memory networks, multi-task learning, transfer learning, evidence retrieval, question answering dataset, question answering benchmark
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
