The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Silicon-Nitride Platform for Narrowband Entangled Photon Generation
Abstract
CMOS-compatible photonic chips are highly desirable for real-world quantum optics devices due to their scalability, robustness, and integration with electronics. Despite impressive advances using Silicon nanostructures, challenges remain in reducing their linear and nonlinear losses and in creating narrowband photons necessary for interfacing with quantum memories. Here we demonstrate the potential of the silicon nitride (Si3N4) platform by realizing an ultracompact, bright, entangled photon-pair source with selectable photon bandwidths down to 30 MHz, which is unprecedented for an integrated source. Leveraging Si3N4's moderate thermal expansion, simple temperature control of the chip enables precise wavelength stabilization and tunability without active control. Single-mode photon pairs at 1550 nm are generated at rates exceeding 107 s-1 with mW's of pump power and are used to produce time-bin entanglement. Moreover, Si3N4 allows for operation from the visible to the mid-IR, which make it highly promising for a wide range of integrated quantum photonics applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The brightness is more than a 500-fold improvement upon previous state-of-the-art microresonators based on Si3N4.
“which is more than a 500-fold improvement upon previous state-of-the-art microresonators based on Si 3 N 4 [28]”
From Ultrabright Entangled-Photon-Pair Generation from anAlGaAs-On-Insulator Microring Resonator (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
The main text (page unavailable) reports a brightness of 3.9 × 10^6 s⁻¹ mW⁻² for the authors’ Si3N4 microresonator. It does not give the brightness of previous Si3N4 microresonators or establish the claimed more-than-500-fold improvement (searched: “500” and previous state-of-the-art brightness). (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
High-visibility interference in a Bell-inequality experiment for energy and time
Kwiat, P. G., Steinberg, A. M., & Chiao, R. Y. (1993) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.47.r2472 · Cited by 358
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- S. Tanzilli, A. Martin, F. Kaiser, M.P. De Micheli, O. Alibart, and D.B. Ostrowsky, "On the genesis and evolution of Integrated Quantum Optics, Laser & Photon. Rev. 6, 115 (2011).! !
- J. O'Brien, B. Patton, M. Sasaki, and J. Vučković, "Focus on integrated quantum optics", New J. Phys. 15, 035016 (2013).! !
- J. P. Sprengers, A. Gaggero, D. Sahin, S. Jahanmirinejad, G. Frucci, F. Mattioli, R. Leoni, J. Beetz, M. Lermer, M. Kamp, S. Höfling, R. Sanjines and A. Fiore, "Waveguide superconducting single-photon detectors for integrated quantum photonic circuits", Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 181110 (2011).! !
- F. Boitier, A. Orieux, C. Autebert, A. Lemaître, E. Galopin, C. Manquest, C. Sirtori, I. Favero, G. Leo, and S. Ducci, "Electrically Injected Photon-Pair Source at Room Temperature", Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 183901 (2014).! !
- C.-S. Chuu, G. Y. Yin, and S. E. Harris, "A miniature ultrabright source of temporally long, narrowband biphotons," Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 051108 (2012).! !
- J. Fekete, D. Rieländer, M. Cristiani, and H. de Riedmatten, "Ultranarrow-band photon- pair source compatible with solid state quantum memories and telecommunication networks," Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 220502 (2013).!
- A. Dutt, K. Luke, S. Manipatruni, A. L. Gaeta, P. Nussenzveig, M. Lipson, "On-Chip Optical Squeezing", Phys. Rev. Applied 3, 044005 (2015).! !
- S. Ferrari, O. Kahl, V. Kovalyuk, G. N. Goltsman, A. Korneev, and W. H. P. Pernice, "Waveguide-integrated single-and multi-photon detection at telecom wavelengths using superconducting nanowires", Applied Physics Letters 106, 151101 (2015).! !
- C. Xiong, X. Zhang, A. Mahendra, J. He, D.-Y. Choi, C. J. Chae, D. Marpaung, A. Leinse, R. G. Heideman, M. Hoekman, C. G. H. Roeloffzen, R. M. Oldenbeuving, P. W. L. van Dijk, C. Taddei, P. H. W. Leong, B. J. Eggleton, "A compact and reconfigurable silicon nitride time- bin entanglement circuit", arXiv:1506.02758 [quant-ph] (2015).! ! · arXiv
- F. Qiu, A. M. Spring, F. Yu, and S. Yokoyama, "Complementary metal-oxide- semiconductor compatible athermal silicon nitride/titanium dioxide hybrid micro-ring resonators", Applied Physics Letters 102, 051106 (2013).! ! ! !
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum memories: emerging applications and recent advances
Heshami, K., England, D. G., Humphreys, P. C., Bustard, P. J., Acosta, V. M., Nunn, J., & Sussman, B. J. (2016) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500340.2016.1148212 · Cited by 503
Li, Q., Davanço, M., & Srinivasan, K. (2016) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2016.64 · Cited by 276
Chip-integrated visible-telecom entangled photon pair source for quantum communication
Lu, X., Li, Q., Westly, D. A., Moille, G., Singh, A., Anant, V., & Srinivasan, K. (2019) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0394-3 · Cited by 272
Imany, P., Jaramillo-Villegas, J. A., Odele, O. D., Han, K., Leaird, D. E., Lukens, J. M., Lougovski, P., Qi, M., & Weiner, A. M. (2018) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.26.001825 · Cited by 185
Ultrabright Entangled-Photon-Pair Generation from anAlGaAs-On-Insulator Microring Resonator
Steiner, T. J., Castro, J. E., Chang, L., Dang, Q., Xie, W., Norman, J., Bowers, J. E., & Moody, G. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.010337 · Cited by 156
“In comparison to other microring resonators utilized for entangled-pair generation, the Q = 1.24 × 106 measured for this device is a factor of 100 larger than for InP, approximately a factor of 10 larger than for AlN and SOI and is comparable to that of Si3N4, as shown in Table I.”
BackgroundInfluentialFrequency multiplexing for quasi-deterministic heralded single-photon sources
Joshi, C., Farsi, A., Clemmen, S., Ramelow, S., & Gaeta, A. L. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03254-4 · Cited by 157
Self-citationQuantum interference between transverse spatial waveguide modes
Mohanty, A., Zhang, M., Dutt, A., Ramelow, S., Nussenzveig, P., & Lipson, M. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14010 · Cited by 103
Self-citationFrequency-Domain Quantum Interference with Correlated Photons from an Integrated Microresonator
Joshi, C., Farsi, A., Dutt, A., Kim, B. Y., Ji, X., Zhao, Y., Bishop, A. M., Lipson, M., & Gaeta, A. L. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.143601 · Cited by 75
Self-citationReduced Dimensionality Lithium Niobate Microsystems
Sandia National Laboratories (SNL-NM), A., Eichenfield, M., & (NNSA), U. N. N. S. A. (2017) · doi:10.2172/1338889 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramelow, S., Farsi, A., Clemmen, S., Orquiza, D., Luke, K., Lipson, M., & Gaeta, A. L.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2015
- arXiv
- 1508.04358
- References
- 1
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
