CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 534Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsQuantum many-body systemsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relative entropy equals bulk relative entropy

Open access
Jafferis, Daniel L., Lewkowycz, Aitor, Maldacena, Juan, Suh, S. Josephine·2015·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1512.06431arXiv 1512.06431
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We consider the gravity dual of the modular Hamiltonian associated to a general subregion of a boundary theory. We use it to argue that the relative entropy of nearby states is given by the relative entropy in the bulk, to leading order in the bulk gravitational coupling. We also argue that the boundary modular flow is dual to the bulk modular flow in the entanglement wedge, with implications for entanglement wedge reconstruction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1512.06431

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 531

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Jafferis, D. L., Lewkowycz, A., Maldacena, J., & Suh, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Institute for Advanced Study (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Lewkowycz, Aitor
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2015
Volume
2016
Issue
6
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1512.06431
arXiv
1512.06431
OpenAlex
W2270074405
Cited by
534
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 21
FWCI
26.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (PHY11- 25915, 1314198, 25915, 1352084)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0009988)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (376206)
  • Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara (PHY-11-25915)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
Kullback-Leibler divergence, modular Hamiltonian, entanglement wedge reconstruction, entanglement wedge, modular flow, AdS/CFT correspondence, gravitational dual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review