PreprintCited by 89Neural Networks and ApplicationsTopic ModelingAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Scaling Memory-Augmented Neural Networks with Sparse Reads and Writes

Open access

Abstract

Neural networks augmented with external memory have the ability to learn algorithmic solutions to complex tasks. These models appear promising for applications such as language modeling and machine translation. However, they scale poorly in both space and time as the amount of memory grows --- limiting their applicability to real-world domains. Here, we present an end-to-end differentiable memory access scheme, which we call Sparse Access Memory (SAM), that retains the representational power of the original approaches whilst training efficiently with very large memories. We show that SAM achieves asymptotic lower bounds in space and time complexity, and find that an implementation runs $1,\!000\times$ faster and with $3,\!000\times$ less physical memory than non-sparse models. SAM learns with comparable data efficiency to existing models on a range of synthetic tasks and one-shot Omniglot character recognition, and can scale to tasks requiring $100,\!000$s of time steps and memories. As well, we show how our approach can be adapted for models that maintain temporal associations between memories, as with the recently introduced Differentiable Neural Computer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1610.09027

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Advanced memory management strategies incorporate compression techniques and gating mechanisms to selectively retain task-relevant information while discarding redundant patterns, addressing the finite capacity constraints inherent in external memory systems.

    “Advanced memory management strategies incorporate compression techniques and gating mechanisms to selectively retain task-relevant information while discarding redundant patterns, addressing the finite capacity constraints inherent in external memory systems31.”

    From Mitigating catastrophic forgetting in lifelong learning: a hybrid architecture integrating neural ordinary differential equations with memory-augmented transformers (2025) · cites this paper as [31]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Sunil Arya, David M. Mount, Nathan S. Netanyahu, Ruth Silverman, and Angela Y. Wu. An optimal algorithm for approximate nearest neighbor searching fixed dimensions. J. ACM, 45(6):891-923, November 1998.
  2. Dzmitry Bahdanau, Kyunghyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.0473, 2014. · arXiv
  3. Mayank Bawa, Tyson Condie, and Prasanna Ganesan. Lsh forest: self-tuning indexes for similarity search. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 651-660. ACM, 2005.
  4. Timothy F Brady, Talia Konkle, George A Alvarez, and Aude Oliva. Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(38):14325-14329, 2008.
  5. Ronan Collobert, Koray Kavukcuoglu, and Clément Farabet. Torch7: A matlab-like environment for machine learning. In BigLearn, NIPS Workshop, number EPFL-CONF-192376, 2011.
  6. Alex Graves, Abdel-rahman Mohamed, and Geoffrey Hinton. Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks. In Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2013 IEEE International Conference on, pages 6645-6649. IEEE, 2013.
  7. Alex Graves, Greg Wayne, and Ivo Danihelka. Neural turing machines. arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.5401, 2014. · arXiv
  8. Felix Hill, Antoine Bordes, Sumit Chopra, and Jason Weston. The goldilocks principle: Reading children's books with explicit memory representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.02301, 2015. · arXiv
  9. Balaji Lakshminarayanan, Daniel M Roy, and Yee Whye Teh. Mondrian forests: Efficient online random forests. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 3140-3148, 2014.
  10. Rajeev Motwani, Assaf Naor, and Rina Panigrahy. Lower bounds on locality sensitive hashing. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, 21(4):930-935, 2007.
  11. Marius Muja and David G. Lowe. Scalable nearest neighbor algorithms for high dimensional data. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 36, 2014.
  12. Adam Santoro, Sergey Bartunov, Matthew Botvinick, Daan Wierstra, and T Lillicrap. Meta-learning with memory-augmented neural networks. In International conference on machine learning, 2016.
  13. Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, Jason Weston, Rob Fergus, et al. End-to-end memory networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 2431-2439, 2015.
  14. Ilya Sutskever, Oriol Vinyals, and Quoc V Le. Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27, pages 3104-3112.
  15. Jason Weston, Antoine Bordes, Sumit Chopra, Alexander M Rush, Bart van Merriënboer, Armand Joulin, and Tomas Mikolov. Towards ai-complete question answering: A set of prerequisite toy tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.05698, 2015. · arXiv
  16. Jason Weston, Sumit Chopra, and Antoine Bordes. Memory networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.3916, 2014. · arXiv
  17. Wojciech Zaremba and Ilya Sutskever. Reinforcement learning neural turing machines. arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.00521, 2015. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rae, J. W., Hunt, J. J., Harley, T., Danihelka, I., Senior, A., Wayne, G., Graves, A., & Lillicrap, T. P.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2016
Volume
29
Pages
3628-3636
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2540419089
Cited by
89
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • neural information processing systems
Funders
DeepMind
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
Keywords
memory-augmented neural networks, memory scalability, asymptotic lower bound, time complexity, space complexity, Omniglot

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review