PreprintCited by 55Distributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsOptimization and Variational AnalysisAdvanced Optimization Algorithms Research

Geometrical Convergence Rate for Distributed Optimization with Time-Varying Directed Graphs and Uncoordinated Step-Sizes

Open access
Lü, Qingguo, Li, Huaqing·2016·arXiv

Abstract

This paper studies a class of distributed optimization algorithms by a set of agents, where each agent has only access to its own local convex objective function, and jointly minimizes the sum of the functions. The communications among agents are described by a sequence of time-varying directed graphs which are assumed to be uniformly strongly connected. A column stochastic mixing matrices is employed in the algorithm, which also exactly steers all the agents to asymptotically converge to a global and consensual optimal solution even under the assumption that the step-sizes are uncoordinated. Two fairly standard conditions for achieving the geometrical convergence rate are established under the assumption that the objective functions are strong convexity and have Lipschitz continuous gradient. The theoretical analysis shows that the distributed algorithm is capable of driving the whole network to geometrically converge to an optimal solution of the convex optimization problem as long as the uncoordinated step-sizes do not exceed some upper bounds. We also give an explicit analysis for the convergence rate of our algorithm through a different approach. Finally, simulation results illustrate the feasibility of the proposed algorithm and the theoretical analysis throughout this paper.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1611.00990

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Allowing agents to use uncoordinated (different) step-sizes, all satisfying an upper bound, is possible.

    “Allowing the agents to use uncoordinated (different) stepsizes (all satisfying an upper bound) is possible; see our very recent subsequent work [44] as well as the related papers [31,74].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lü, Q., & Li, H.
Affiliations
Southwest University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Huaqing
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2016
Volume
422
Pages
516-530
ISSN
0020-0255 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2964280898
Cited by
54
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (public-domain)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61403314, 61773321, 61762020)
  • Chongqing University (2007DA10512716421)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016M590852)
  • Guizhou Science and Technology Department (QKHJC20161076)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (XDJK2016B016, XDJK2017D174)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Optimization and Variational Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Numerical Analysis › Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research
Keywords
distributed optimization, time-varying directed graphs, strong convexity, Lipschitz continuous gradient, consensus, convex optimization, multi-agent systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review