Cosmological perturbation and matter power spectrum in bimetric massive gravity
Open accessAbstract
We discuss the linear perturbation equations with the synchronous gauge in a minimal scenario of the bimetric massive gravity theory. We find that the matter density perturbation and matter power spectrum are suppressed. We also examine the ghost and stability problems and show that the allowed deviation of this gravitational theory from the cosmological constant is constrained to be smaller than $\mathcal{O}(10^{-2})$ by the large scale structure observational data.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Geng et al. found that in a minimum nontrivial bimetric massive gravity case, the model has a phantom-type equation of state.
“They also analyzed the evolution of the effective dark energy density and found that the model has a phantom-type equation of state, .”
From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Geng et al. 2017
Geng et al. found an effective dark energy equation of state of a phantom type for a minimum nontrivial bimetric model.
“As we reported earlier, they found an effective dark energy equation of state of a phantom type.”
From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Geng et al. 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- [7]M. Fierz and W. Pauli, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 173 , 211 (1939).
- [12]A. Lue, R. Scoccimarro and G. D. Starkman, Phys. Rev. D 69 , 124015 (2004) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.124015 [astro-ph/0401515]. · DOI
- [13]K. Koyama and F. P. Silva, Phys. Rev. D 75 , 084040 (2007) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.084040 [hep-th/0702169 [HEP-TH]]. · DOI
- [14]K. Koyama, A. Taruya and T. Hiramatsu, Phys. Rev. D 79 , 123512 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.123512 [arXiv:0902.0618 [astro-ph.CO]]. · DOI · Paper page
- [15]K. Koyama, G. Niz and G. Tasinato, Phys. Rev. D 88 , 021502 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.021502 [arXiv:1305.0279 [hep-th]]. · DOI
- [16]A. Barreira, B. Li, W. A. Hellwing, L. Lombriser, C. M. Baugh and S. Pascoli, JCAP 1404 , 029 (2014) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/04/029 [arXiv:1401.1497 [astro-ph.CO]]. · DOI
- [17]K. Koyama and J. Sakstein, Phys. Rev. D 91 , 124066 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.124066 [arXiv:1502.06872 [astro-ph.CO]]. · DOI
- [18]K. Koyama, Rept. Prog. Phys. 79 , no. 4, 046902 (2016) doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/4/046902 [arXiv:1504.04623 [astro-ph.CO]]. · DOI · Paper page
- [19]M. Crisostomi and K. Koyama, arXiv:1711.06661 [astro-ph.CO]. · arXiv
- [21]C. de Rham, and G. Gabadadze, Phys. Rev. D 82 , 044020 (2010) [arXiv:1007.0443]. · arXiv
- [22]C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze, and A. J. Tolley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 , 231101 (2011) [arXiv:1011.1232]. · arXiv
- [23]S. F. Hassan, and R. A. Rosen, JHEP 04 , 123 (2012) [arXiv:1111.2070]. · arXiv
- [24]G. DAmico, C. de Rham, S. L. Dubovsky, G. Gabadadze, and D. Pirtskhalava, and A. J. Tolley, Phys. Rev. D 84 , 124046 (2011) [arXiv:1108.5231]. · arXiv
- [27]S. F. Hassan, and R. A. Rosen, JHEP 02 , 126 (2012) [arXiv:1109.3515]. · arXiv
- [28]S. F. Hassan, R. A. Rosen, and A. Schmidt-May, JHEP 02 , 026 (2012) [arXiv:1109.3230]. · arXiv
- [31]A. Higuchi, Nucl. Phys. B 282 , 397 (1987). doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90691-2 · DOI
- [32]A. Higuchi, Nucl. Phys. B 325 , 745 (1989). doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90507-5 · DOI
- [43]F. K¨ onnig, A. Patil, and L. Amendola, JCAP 03, 029 (2014).
- [50]E. Mortsell, arXiv:1701.00710 [gr-qc]. · arXiv
- [51]M. Lagos, P. Ferreira, arXiv:1610.00553 [gr-qc]. · arXiv
- [66]B. Falck, K. Koyama, G. b. Zhao and B. Li, JCAP 1407 , 058 (2014) doi:10.1088/14757516/2014/07/058 [arXiv:1404.2206 [astro-ph.CO]]. · DOI
- [67]A. Barreira, B. Li, W. A. Hellwing, C. M. Baugh and S. Pascoli, JCAP 1310 , 027 (2013) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/10/027 [arXiv:1306.3219 [astro-ph.CO]]. · DOI
- [68]B. Li, A. Barreira, C. M. Baugh, W. A. Hellwing, K. Koyama, S. Pascoli and G. B. Zhao, JCAP 1311 , 012 (2013) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/11/012 [arXiv:1308.3491 [astro-ph.CO]]. · DOI
- [69]A. Barreira, B. Li, C. M. Baugh and S. Pascoli, JCAP 1311 , 056 (2013) doi:10.1088/14757516/2013/11/056 [arXiv:1308.3699 [astro-ph.CO]]. · DOI
- [70]P. A. R. Ade et al. [Planck Collaboration], Astron. Astrophys. 594 , A14 (2016) doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525814 [arXiv:1502.01590 [astro-ph.CO]]. · DOI
- [71]D. Comelli, M. Crisostomi, F. Nesti, and L. Pilo, JHEP 1203 , 067 (2012) [arXiv:1111.1983]. · arXiv
- [73]N. Khosravi, H. R. Sepangi and S. Shahidi, Phys. Rev. D 86 , 043517 (2012) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.043517 [arXiv:1202.2767 [gr-qc]]. · DOI
- [74]F. K¨ onnig, Y. Akrami, L. Amendola, M. Motta and A. R. Solomon, Phys. Rev. D 90 , 124014 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.124014 [arXiv:1407.4331 [astro-ph.CO]]. · DOI · Paper page
- [75]C. P. Ma and E. Bertschinger, Astrophys. J. 455 , 7 (1995) doi:10.1086/176550 [astroph/9506072]. · DOI · Paper page
- [76]K. N. Abazajian et al. [SDSS Collaboration], Astrophys. J. Suppl. 182 , 543 (2009) doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 [arXiv:0812.0649 [astro-ph]]. · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Testing general relativity in cosmology
Ishak, M. (2019) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-018-0017-4 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
- Authors
- Geng, C.-Q., Lee, C.-C., & Zhang, K.
- Affiliations
- Hunan Normal University (CN)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- National Center for Theoretical Sciences (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Geng, Chao-Qiang
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 391
- Pages
- 16-26
- ISSN
- 0003-4916 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1701.00811
- OpenAlex
- W2570314876
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Annals of Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (11505004)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Keywords
- cosmological perturbations, matter power spectrum, matter density perturbations, linear perturbation equations, synchronous gauge, ghost instability, large-scale structure constraints
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
