The DOI matches its DataCite record, with a small difference in title or year.
SVCCA: Singular Vector Canonical Correlation Analysis for Deep Learning Dynamics and Interpretability
Open accessAbstract
We propose a new technique, Singular Vector Canonical Correlation Analysis (SVCCA), a tool for quickly comparing two representations in a way that is both invariant to affine transform (allowing comparison between different layers and networks) and fast to compute (allowing more comparisons to be calculated than with previous methods). We deploy this tool to measure the intrinsic dimensionality of layers, showing in some cases needless over-parameterization; to probe learning dynamics throughout training, finding that networks converge to final representations from the bottom up; to show where class-specific information in networks is formed; and to suggest new training regimes that simultaneously save computation and overfit less. Code: https://github.com/google/svcca/
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Several other methods, such as t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) and correlation-based singular vector canonical correlation analysis (SVCCA) [48], play a significant role in directing towards the subspace of input for error-free predictions.”
From Interpreting Black-Box Models: A Review on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2024) · cites this paper as [48]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Toward Medical XAI
Tjoa, E., & Guan, C. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2020.3027314 · Cited by 2,524
Interpreting Black-Box Models: A Review on Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Hassija, V., Chamola, V., Mahapatra, A., Singal, A., Goel, D., Huang, K., Scardapane, S., Spinelli, I., Mahmud, M., & Hussain, A. (2024) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-023-10179-8 · Cited by 2,495
Transfusion: Understanding Transfer Learning for Medical ImagingPreprint
Raghu, M., Zhang, C., Kleinberg, J. M., & Samy Bengio, A. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.07208 · Cited by 901
Self-citationThe Building Blocks of Interpretability
Olah, C., Satyanarayan, A., Johnson, I., Carter, S., Schubert, L., Ye, K., & Mordvintsev, A. (2018) · Distill · doi:10.23915/distill.00010 · Cited by 591
The need for uncertainty quantification in machine-assisted medical decision making
Begoli, E., Bhattacharya, T., & Kusnezov, D. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-018-0004-1 · Cited by 597
Metadata
- Authors
- Raghu, M., Gilmer, J., Yosinski, J., & Sohl-Dickstein, J.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- Uber AI (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Gilmer, Justin
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 30
- Pages
- 6076-6085
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1706.05806
- OpenAlex
- W2767204723
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 7
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- neural information processing systems
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
- Keywords
- representation comparison, affine invariance, overparameterization, learning dynamics, training dynamics, interpretability, training protocols, overfitting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
