Robust entanglement renormalization on a noisy quantum computer
Open accessAbstract
A method to study strongly interacting quantum many-body systems at and away from criticality is proposed. The method is based on a MERA-like tensor network that can be efficiently and reliably contracted on a noisy quantum computer using a number of qubits that is much smaller than the system size. We prove that the outcome of the contraction is stable to noise and that the estimated energy upper bounds the ground state energy. The stability, which we numerically substantiate, follows from the positivity of operator scaling dimensions under renormalization group flow. The variational upper bound follows from a particular assignment of physical qubits to different locations of the tensor network plus the assumption that the noise model is local. We postulate a scaling law for how well the tensor network can approximate ground states of lattice regulated conformal field theories in d spatial dimensions and provide evidence for the postulate. Under this postulate, a $O(\log^{d}(1/δ))$-qubit quantum computer can prepare a valid quantum-mechanical state with energy density $δ$ above the ground state. In the presence of noise, $δ= O(ε\log^{d+1}(1/ε))$ can be achieved, where $ε$ is the noise strength.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This classifier approach has been used in generalization and classification tasks, with different ways of embedding classical data into quantum states and an experimental demonstration of variational classification.
“This approach has been used in generalization and in classification tasks [80, 156], with Refs. [76, 80, 160, 161] discussing different ways of embedding classical data into quantum states (such as data re-uploading), and with Ref. [158] showing an experimental demonstration of variational classification.”
From Variational quantum algorithms (2021) · cites this paper as [76]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond
Preskill, J. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 · Cited by 8,830 · see citing works
“s away by a later time. Such noise resilience ischaracteristic ofsome tensor network constructions which canbe invoked for solving quantum optimization problems using Variational Quantum Eigensolvers [32, 33]. There is a substantial opportunity for experimentalists and theorists, working together over the next few yea…”
BackgroundVariational quantum algorithms
Cerezo, M., Arrasmith, A., Babbush, R., Benjamin, S. C., Endo, S., Fujii, K., McClean, J. R., Mitarai, K., Yuan, X., Cincio, L., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00348-9 · Cited by 3,385 · see citing works
Quantum computational chemistry
McArdle, S., Endo, S., Aspuru-Guzik, A., Benjamin, S. C., & Yuan, X. (2020) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.015003 · Cited by 1,621 · see citing works
Generalized Unitary Coupled Cluster Wave functions for Quantum Computation
Lee, J., Huggins, W. J., Head-Gordon, M., & Whaley, K. B. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01004 · Cited by 432 · see citing works
Differentiable Programming Tensor Networks
Liao, H.-J., Liu, J.-G., Wang, L., & Xiang, T. (2019) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.031041 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Parallel quantum simulation of large systems on small NISQ computers
Barratt, F., Dborin, J., Bal, M., Stojevic, V., Pollmann, F., & Green, A. G. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-021-00420-3 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Learning and inference on generative adversarial quantum circuits
Zeng, J., Wu, Y., Liu, J.-G., Wang, L., & Hu, J. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.052306 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Product spectrum ansatz and the simplicity of thermal states
Martyn, J., & Swingle, B. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.032107 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Kim, I. H., & Swingle, B.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2017
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1711.07500
- OpenAlex
- W2768807728
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1125915)
- Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- entanglement renormalization, MERA, tensor networks, noisy quantum computers, quantum many-body systems, renormalization group flow, variational upper bound, ground state energy, quantum simulation, noise robustness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review