PreprintCited by 29Quantum many-body systemsQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and Cryptography

Robust entanglement renormalization on a noisy quantum computer

Open access
Kim, Isaac H., Swingle, Brian·2017·arXiv

Abstract

A method to study strongly interacting quantum many-body systems at and away from criticality is proposed. The method is based on a MERA-like tensor network that can be efficiently and reliably contracted on a noisy quantum computer using a number of qubits that is much smaller than the system size. We prove that the outcome of the contraction is stable to noise and that the estimated energy upper bounds the ground state energy. The stability, which we numerically substantiate, follows from the positivity of operator scaling dimensions under renormalization group flow. The variational upper bound follows from a particular assignment of physical qubits to different locations of the tensor network plus the assumption that the noise model is local. We postulate a scaling law for how well the tensor network can approximate ground states of lattice regulated conformal field theories in d spatial dimensions and provide evidence for the postulate. Under this postulate, a $O(\log^{d}(1/δ))$-qubit quantum computer can prepare a valid quantum-mechanical state with energy density $δ$ above the ground state. In the presence of noise, $δ= O(ε\log^{d+1}(1/ε))$ can be achieved, where $ε$ is the noise strength.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1711.07500

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This classifier approach has been used in generalization and classification tasks, with different ways of embedding classical data into quantum states and an experimental demonstration of variational classification.

    “This approach has been used in generalization and in classification tasks [80, 156], with Refs. [76, 80, 160, 161] discussing different ways of embedding classical data into quantum states (such as data re-uploading), and with Ref. [158] showing an experimental demonstration of variational classification.”

    From Variational quantum algorithms (2021) · cites this paper as [76]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, I. H., & Swingle, B.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2017
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2768807728
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1125915)
  • Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
entanglement renormalization, MERA, tensor networks, noisy quantum computers, quantum many-body systems, renormalization group flow, variational upper bound, ground state energy, quantum simulation, noise robustness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review