PreprintCited by 1,085Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Image Processing Techniques

Image transformer

Open access
Parmar, Niki, Vaswani, Ashish, Uszkoreit, Jakob, Kaiser, Łukasz, Shazeer, Noam, Ku, Alexander, Tran, Dustin·2018·arXiv

Abstract

Image generation has been successfully cast as an autoregressive sequence generation or transformation problem. Recent work has shown that self-attention is an effective way of modeling textual sequences. In this work, we generalize a recently proposed model architecture based on self-attention, the Transformer, to a sequence modeling formulation of image generation with a tractable likelihood. By restricting the self-attention mechanism to attend to local neighborhoods we significantly increase the size of images the model can process in practice, despite maintaining significantly larger receptive fields per layer than typical convolutional neural networks. While conceptually simple, our generative models significantly outperform the current state of the art in image generation on ImageNet, improving the best published negative log-likelihood on ImageNet from 3.83 to 3.77. We also present results on image super-resolution with a large magnification ratio, applying an encoder-decoder configuration of our architecture. In a human evaluation study, we find that images generated by our super-resolution model fool human observers three times more often than the previous state of the art.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1802.05751

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Virtually all existing architectures for dense prediction are based on convolutional networks.

    “Virtually all existing architectures for dense prediction are based on convolutional networks [6,31,34,42,49,50,53].”

    From Vision Transformers for Dense Prediction (2021) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Introduction (p. 1) says convolutional models such as PixelCNN had received much more attention for pixel-by-pixel image generation. It does not establish that virtually all architectures across the broader category of dense prediction are convolutional; it also discusses recurrent models and proposes a self-attention alternative (Introduction, p. 2). (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Closest to DETR are end-to-end set predictions for object detection and instance segmentation.

    “Closest to our approach are end-to-end set predictions for object detection [43] and instance segmentation [41,30,36,42].”

    From End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers (2020) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Introduction (p. 1) describes predicting image pixels, and the Experiments (pp. 5–7) concern image generation and super-resolution. Searches for end-to-end set prediction, object detection, and instance segmentation found no passage in our copy addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Ba, Jimmy Lei, Kiros, Jamie Ryan, and Hinton, Geoffrey E. Layer normalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.06450 , 2016. · arXiv
  2. Bellemare, Marc G., Srinivasan, Sriram, Ostrovski, Georg, Schaul, Tom, Saxton, David, and Munos, R´ emi. Unifying count-based exploration and intrinsic motivation. CoRR , abs/1606.01868, 2016. URL http://arxiv.org/ abs/1606.01868 . · arXiv
  3. Bengio, Yoshua and Bengio, Samy. Modeling highdimensional discrete data with multi-layer neural networks. In Neural Information Processing Systems , pp. 400-406. MIT Press, 2000.
  4. CoRR , abs/1703.10717, 2017. URL http://arxiv. org/abs/1703.10717 . · arXiv
  5. Chen, Xi, Mishra, Nikhil, Rohaninejad, Mostafa, and Abbeel, Pieter. Pixelsnail: An improved autoregressive generative model. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.09763 , 2017. · arXiv
  6. Cheng, Jianpeng, Dong, Li, and Lapata, Mirella. Long short-term memory-networks for machine reading. arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.06733 , 2016. · arXiv
  7. Dahl, Ryan, Norouzi, Mohammad, and Shlens, Jonathan. Pixel recursive super resolution. 2017. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/1702.00783 .
  8. Kalchbrenner, Nal and Blunsom, Phil. Recurrent continuous translation models. In Proceedings EMNLP 2013 , pp. 1700-1709, 2013. URL http://nal.co/papers/ KalchbrennerBlunsom\_EMNLP13 .
  9. Kalchbrenner, Nal, van den Oord, A¨ aron, Simonyan, Karen, Danihelka, Ivo, Vinyals, Oriol, Graves, Alex, and Kavukcuoglu, Koray. Video pixel networks. CoRR , abs/1610.00527, 2016. URL http://arxiv.org/ abs/1610.00527 . · arXiv
  10. Kingma, Diederik and Ba, Jimmy. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In ICLR , 2015.
  11. Larochelle, Hugo and Murray, Iain. The neural autoregressive distribution estimator. In The Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , volume 15 of JMLR: W&CP , pp. 29-37, 2011.
  12. Ledig, Christian, Theis, Lucas, Huszar, Ferenc, Caballero, Jose, Aitken, Andrew, Tejani, Alykhan, Totz, Johannes, Wang, Zehan, and Shi, Wenzhe. Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network. arXiv:1609.04802 , 2016. · arXiv
  13. Mansimov, Elman, Parisotto, Emilio, Ba, Lei Jimmy, and Salakhutdinov, Ruslan. Generating images from captions with attention. CoRR , abs/1511.02793, 2015. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.02793 . · arXiv
  14. Metz, Luke, Poole, Ben, Pfau, David, and Sohl-Dickstein, Jascha. Unrolled generative adversarial networks. CoRR , abs/1611.02163, 2016. URL http://arxiv.org/ abs/1611.02163 . · arXiv
  15. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , 2016. URL https://arxiv.org/pdf/1606. 01933.pdf .
  16. Radford, Alec, Metz, Luke, and Chintala, Soumith. Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks. CoRR , abs/1511.06434, 2015. URL http://arxiv.org/ abs/1511.06434 . · arXiv
  17. Srivastava, Nitish, Hinton, Geoffrey E, Krizhevsky, Alex, Sutskever, Ilya, and Salakhutdinov, Ruslan. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 15(1):1929-1958, 2014.
  18. Theis, Lucas and Bethge, Matthias. Generative image modeling using spatial lstms. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems - Volume 2 , NIPS'15, pp. 1927-1935, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015. MIT Press. URL http://dl.acm. org/citation.cfm?id=2969442.2969455 .
  19. van den Oord, A¨ aron and Schrauwen, Benjamin. The student-t mixture as a natural image patch prior with application to image compression. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 15:2061-2086, 2014. URL http://jmlr.org/papers/v15/ vandenoord14a.html .
  20. van den Oord, A¨ aron, Kalchbrenner, Nal, and Kavukcuoglu, Koray. Pixel recurrent neural networks. ICML , 2016a.
  21. van den Oord, A¨ aron, Kalchbrenner, Nal, Vinyals, Oriol, Espeholt, Lasse, Graves, Alex, and Kavukcuoglu, Koray. Conditional image generation with pixelcnn decoders. NIPS , 2016b.
  22. Vaswani, Ashish, Shazeer, Noam, Parmar, Niki, Uszkoreit, Jakob, Jones, Llion, Gomez, Aidan N., Kaiser, Lukasz, and Polosukhin, Illia. Attention is all you need. 2017. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762 . · arXiv
  23. Vaswani, Ashish, Bengio, Samy, Brevdo, Eugene, Chollet, Francois, Gomez, Aidan N., Gouws, Stephan, Jones, Llion, Kaiser, Łukasz, Kalchbrenner, Nal, Parmar, Niki, Sepassi, Ryan, Shazeer, Noam, and Uszkoreit, Jakob. Tensor2tensor for neural machine translation. CoRR , abs/1803.07416, 2018. URL http://arxiv.org/ abs/1803.07416 . · arXiv
  24. Zhang, Han, Xu, Tao, Li, Hongsheng, Zhang, Shaoting, Huang, Xiaolei, Wang, Xiaogang, and Metaxas, Dimitris N. Stackgan: Text to photo-realistic image synthesis with stacked generative adversarial networks. CoRR , abs/1612.03242, 2016. URL http://arxiv.org/ abs/1612.03242 . · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parmar, N., Vaswani, A., Uszkoreit, J., Kaiser, Ł., Shazeer, N., Ku, A., & Tran, D.
Affiliations
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4295224299
Cited by
1,085
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 191 · 2023: 260 · 2022: 238 · 2021: 216 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 6
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
Keywords
image generation, self-attention, transformer models, local attention, image super-resolution, ImageNet, encoder-decoder architecture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review