PreprintCited by 107Speech Recognition and SynthesisMusic and Audio ProcessingSpeech and Audio Processing

MelNet: a generative model for audio in the frequency domain

Open access
Vasquez, Sean, Lewis, Mike·2019·arXiv

Abstract

Capturing high-level structure in audio waveforms is challenging because a single second of audio spans tens of thousands of timesteps. While long-range dependencies are difficult to model directly in the time domain, we show that they can be more tractably modelled in two-dimensional time-frequency representations such as spectrograms. By leveraging this representational advantage, in conjunction with a highly expressive probabilistic model and a multiscale generation procedure, we design a model capable of generating high-fidelity audio samples which capture structure at timescales that time-domain models have yet to achieve. We apply our model to a variety of audio generation tasks, including unconditional speech generation, music generation, and text-to-speech synthesis---showing improvements over previous approaches in both density estimates and human judgments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1906.01083

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MelNet, which used a 140-hour single speaker dataset and the VoxCeleb2 multi-speaker dataset, has better performance than previous works.

    “MelNet (Vasquez and Lewis, 2019), which has used a 140 h single speaker dataset, as well as VoxCeleb2 (Chung et al., 2018) multi-speaker dataset, has a better performance than the previous works.”

    From Audio deepfakes: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as Vasquez and Lewis, 2019

    The Single-Speaker Speech section (p. 7) says MelNet used a 140-hour subset of Blizzard 2013, and the Multi-Speaker Speech section (p. 7) says it used VoxCeleb2. Human evaluations (p. 8) found MelNet better than WaveNet at capturing long-range structure, but Related Work (p. 10) says WaveNet produced higher-fidelity audio. The unqualified claim of better performance than previous works overstates the comparison. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [14][14] Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. Generative adversarial nets. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pages 2672-2680, 2014. -
  2. [22][22] Sepp Hochreiter and J¨ urgen Schmidhuber. Long shortterm memory. Neural computation , 9(8):1735-1780, 1997. -
  3. [31][31] Durk P Kingma and Prafulla Dhariwal. Glow: Generative flow with invertible 1x1 convolutions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 10236-10245, 2018. -
  4. [46][46] Tijmen Tieleman and Geoffrey Hinton. Lecture 6.5rmsprop: Divide the gradient by a running average of its recent magnitude. COURSERA: Neural networks for machine learning , 4(2):26-31, 2012. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vasquez, S., & Lewis, M.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2948211236
Cited by
107
References
50
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 7
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
audio generation, spectrogram, time-frequency representation, long-range dependencies, music generation, text-to-speech

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review