Revamping AI models in dermatology: overcoming critical challenges for enhanced skin lesion diagnosis
Open accessAbstract
The surge in developing deep learning models for diagnosing skin lesions through image analysis is notable, yet their clinical black faces challenges. Current dermatology AI models have limitations: limited number of possible diagnostic outputs, lack of real-world testing on uncommon skin lesions, inability to detect out-of-distribution images, and over-reliance on dermoscopic images. To address these, we present an All-In-One \textbf{H}ierarchical-\textbf{O}ut of Distribution-\textbf{C}linical Triage (HOT) model. For a clinical image, our model generates three outputs: a hierarchical prediction, an alert for out-of-distribution images, and a recommendation for dermoscopy if clinical image alone is insufficient for diagnosis. When the recommendation is pursued, it integrates both clinical and dermoscopic images to deliver final diagnosis. Extensive experiments on a representative cutaneous lesion dataset demonstrate the effectiveness and synergy of each component within our framework. Our versatile model provides valuable decision support for lesion diagnosis and sets a promising precedent for medical AI applications.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The HOT model could handle out-of-distribution data and obtained an AUROC of 81.80% for OOD(17 cL) and 71.79% for OOD.
“The model also could handle OOD data and obtain the AUROC of 81.80% for OOD(17 cL) and 71.79% for OOD.”
From Revolutionizing dermatopathology using AI in skin diagnostics: scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [35]
Table 3 (Section 3.2, p. 10) reports AUROC values of 81.804% for OOD(17cl) using clinical images and 71.79% for OOD(Unk) using combined clinical and dermoscopic images. The claim gives the correct rounded figures, but leaves out that they refer to different image modalities and that 71.79% is specifically for OOD(Unk), not OOD data generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMehta et al.'s HOT model increased F1 scores from 0.574 to 0.607 using hierarchical predictions, and F1 rose to 0.617 when clinical and dermoscopic image datasets were combined.
“According to this model, F1 scores increased from 0.574 to 0.607 by using hierarchical predictions in the model. The F1-score was raised to 0.617 when the clinical and the dermoscopic image datasets were combined”
From Revolutionizing dermatopathology using AI in skin diagnostics: scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [35]
Table 2 (section 3.1, p. 8) reports F1 scores of 0.574 for singular prediction using dermoscopic images and 0.607 for hierarchical prediction using combined clinical and dermoscopic images. These figures come from different image modalities, so the table does not isolate an increase caused by hierarchical prediction. It reports 0.607—not 0.617—for the combined-image hierarchical result; a search for 0.617 found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMehta et al. proposed a model which increased F1 scores from 0.574 with hierarchical predictions to 0.617 and further to 0.619 when clinical and dermoscopic data were used.
“Mehta et al. (35) also proposed a model which increased the F1 scores from 0.574 with hierarchical predictions to 0.617 and further to 0.619 when clinical and dermoscopic data were used.”
From Revolutionizing dermatopathology using AI in skin diagnostics: scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [35]
Table 2 (section 3.1, p. 8) reports an F1 score of 0.574 for hierarchical predictions using clinical images. The table in section 3.2 (p. 11) reports 0.617 for a different configuration—hierarchical prediction plus mixup and prototype learning using both clinical and dermoscopic images. Our copy does not substantiate the further increase to 0.619. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThis model was able to handle out-of-distribution (OOD) data, with AUROC 81.80% for OOD (17 cL) and 71.79% for OOD (Unk).
“This model was able to handle out-of-distribution (OOD) data, with an AUROC of 81.80% for OOD (17 cL) and 71.79% for OOD (Unk).”
From Revolutionizing dermatopathology using AI in skin diagnostics: scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [35]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Resnet34 [45] was employed as our CNN architecture, while the Transformer Encoder-Decoder block of End-to-End Detection Transformer (DETR) [46] was adopted for encoding and decoding the features learned by the CNN.”
MethodEnd-to-End Object Detection with Transformers
Carion, N., Massa, F., Synnaeve, G., Usunier, N., Kirillov, A., & Zagoruyko, S. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58452-8_13 · Cited by 18,285 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Resnet34 [45] was employed as our CNN architecture, while the Transformer Encoder-Decoder block of End-to-End Detection Transformer (DETR) [46] was adopted for encoding and decoding the features learned by the CNN.”
MethodDermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Blau, H. M., & Thrun, S. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21056 · Cited by 14,362 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Our hierarchical framework provides a three-level prediction for skin lesion images, which is more informative than the traditional single-output prediction [8].”
Backgroundmixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimization
Zhang, H., Cisse, M., Dauphin, Y. N., & Lopez-Paz, D. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.09412 · Cited by 5,831 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Mixup technique [37] combines two different images and their corresponding labels, which can help to create better decision boundaries between the two corresponding categories.”
BackgroundMethodHaenssle, H. A., Fink, C., Schneiderbauer, R., Toberer, F., Buhl, T., Blum, A., Kalloo, A., Hassen, A. B. H., Thomas, L., Enk, A., et al. (2018) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy166 · Cited by 1,571 · cited 1× · see citing works
“AI techniques, including deep learning and machine learning models, have demonstrated promising results [8, 9] and even outperformed dermatologists in certain tasks of skin cancer classification [10, 11].”
BackgroundAttention Augmented Convolutional Networks
Bello, I., Zoph, B., Le, Q. V., Vaswani, A., & Shlens, J. (2019) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00338 · Cited by 1,320 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Each encoder layer in the Transformer includes a standard architecture comprising a multi-head self-attention module and a feed-forward network (FFN), further supplemented with fixed positional encoding [47, 48] that is added to the input of each attention layer.”
MethodParmar, N., Vaswani, A., Uszkoreit, J., Kaiser, Ł., Shazeer, N., Ku, A., & Tran, D. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.05751 · Cited by 1,085 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Each encoder layer in the Transformer includes a standard architecture comprising a multi-head self-attention module and a feed-forward network (FFN), further supplemented with fixed positional encoding [47, 48] that is added to the input of each attention layer.”
MethodHuman-computer collaboration for skin cancer recognition
Tschandl, P., Rinner, C., Apalla, Z., Argenziano, G., Codella, N., Halpern, A., Janda, M., Lallas, A., Longo, C., Malvehy, J., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0942-0 · Cited by 1,024 · cited 1× · see citing works
“If an OOD alert is raised, the input image should be treated as an outlier and its original prediction should not be trusted, which is vital for medical AI applications [30] to mitigate potential misleading of clinicians [31].”
BackgroundSelf-citationA deep learning system for differential diagnosis of skin diseases
Liu, Y., Jain, A., Eng, C., Way, D. H., Lee, K., Bui, P., Kanada, K., de Oliveira Marinho, G., Gallegos, J., Gabriele, S., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0842-3 · Cited by 853 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Recent advancements in skin imaging technology and Artificial Intelligence (AI) may assist in increasing the accessibility of dermatology expertise [5].”
BackgroundInfluentialVirtual health care in the era of COVID-19
Webster, P. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30818-7 · Cited by 769 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The hierarchical connection extends this split to level 1 and level 2 samples 4 .”
BackgroundAutomatic skin lesion segmentation using deep fully convolutional networks with jaccard distance.
Yuan, Y., Chao, M., & Lo, Y.-C. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2017.2695227 · Cited by 687 · see citing works
Skin Lesion Analysis towards Melanoma Detection Using Deep Learning Network
Li, Y., & Shen, L. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18020556 · Cited by 645 · see citing works
Brinker, T. J., Hekler, A., Enk, A. H., Klode, J., Hauschild, A., Berking, C., Schilling, B., Haferkamp, S., Schadendorf, D., Holland-Letz, T., et al. (2019) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.001 · Cited by 605 · cited 1× · see citing works
“AI techniques, including deep learning and machine learning models, have demonstrated promising results [8, 9] and even outperformed dermatologists in certain tasks of skin cancer classification [10, 11].”
BackgroundTschandl, P., Codella, N., Akay, B. N., Argenziano, G., Braun, R. P., Cabo, H., Gutman, D., Halpern, A., Helba, B., Hofmann-Wellenhof, R., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30333-x · Cited by 555 · see citing works
Self-citationRobust Classification with Convolutional Prototype Learning
Yang, H., Zhang, X.-Y., Yin, F., & Liu, C. (2018) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00366 · Cited by 493 · cited 2× · see citing works
“To do so we build upon the hierarchical module by combining mixup strategy [37] and prototype learning [38].”
BackgroundMethodOn Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networks
Thulasidasan, S., (NNSA), U. N. N. S. A., Chennupati, G., Bilmes, J., Tanmoy Bhattacharya, A., & Michalak, S. (2019) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.2172/1525811 · Cited by 423 · cited 2× · see citing works
“It is necessary to learn better decision boundaries to achieve OOD detection and clinical triage recommendation capabilities [39, 40].”
BackgroundCruz-Roa, A. A., Arevalo Ovalle, J. E., Madabhushi, A., & González Osorio, F. A. (2013) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40763-5_50 · Cited by 403 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Despite these AI advancements [12–19], challenges remain in the adoption of AI for clinical decision-making [20].”
BackgroundGlobal Burden of Skin Disease: Inequities and Innovations
Seth, D., Cheldize, K., Brown, D., & Freeman, E. E. (2017) · Current Dermatology Reports · doi:10.1007/s13671-017-0192-7 · Cited by 366 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Providing high-quality care is crucial for alleviating the global burden of skin diseases [1].”
BackgroundSkin Lesion Classification from Dermoscopic Images Using Deep Learning Techniques
Romero-López, A., Giró-i-Nieto, X., Burdick, J., & Marques, O. (2017) · Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.2316/p.2017.852-053 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
What is AI? Applications of artificial intelligence to dermatology
Du‐Harpur, X., Watt, F. M., Luscombe, N. M., & Lynch, M. D. (2020) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.18880 · Cited by 355 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…an AI model offering a more nuanced diagnostic capability, such as hierarchical akin to a differential diagnosis in addition to identifying an OOD image, or providing a triage recommendation, would better align with the clinical thought process, thereby enhancing confidence in the AI model [28].”
BackgroundToward a perception-based theory of probabilistic reasoning with imprecise probabilities
Zadeh, L. A. (2002) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/s0378-3758(01)00212-9 · Cited by 351 · cited 1× · see citing works
“AI models trained on images from a specific device can encounter domain shift [52, 53] issues when tested on external validation image sets from a different camera device.”
BackgroundMultimodal skin lesion classification using deep learning
Yap, J., Yolland, W., & Tschandl, P. (2018) · Experimental Dermatology · doi:10.1111/exd.13777 · Cited by 326 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Despite these AI advancements [12–19], challenges remain in the adoption of AI for clinical decision-making [20].”
BackgroundHan, S. S., Park, G. H., Lim, W., Kim, M. S., Na, J. I., Park, I., & Chang, S. E. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0191493 · Cited by 305 · cited 1× · see citing works
“• AI models primarily use dermoscopic images [24], despite clinical skin photographs often being sufficient or even superior for diagnosing many common skin lesions [25].”
BackgroundBCN20000: Dermoscopic Lesions in the Wild
Combalia, M., Codella, N., Rotemberg, V. M., Helba, B., Vilaplana, V., Reiter, O., Carrera, C., Barreiro, A., Halpern, A. C., Puig, S., et al. (2019) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.02288 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Open-Set Recognition: a Good Closed-Set Classifier is All You Need?Preprint
Vaze, S., Han, K., Vedaldi, A., & Zisserman, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.06207 · Cited by 257 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…technique will suffer a trade-off between achieving a high OOD detection performance and retaining the In-Distribution classification performance [41] Thus, we also test our “Hierarchical+MPL” strategy for In-Distribution classification performance across the three levels and three image…”
MethodThe US dermatology workforce: a specialty remains in shortage.
Kimball, A. B., & Resneck, J. S. (2008) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2008.06.037 · Cited by 257 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, the shortage of dermatologists [2], especially evident during the COVID-19 crisis, has led to their escalating consultation costs [3, 4].”
BackgroundGroh, M., Harris, C., Soenksen, L. R., Lau, F., Han, R., Kim, A., Koochek, A., & Badri, O. (2021) · IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw53098.2021.00201 · Cited by 247 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Our dataset lacks specific skin tone type information (as featured in the Fitzpatrick 17k dataset [51]), preventing us from evaluating our model’s generalizability across different skin tones.”
Learning with Hierarchical-Deep Models
Salakhutdinov, R., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Torralba, A. B. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.269 · Cited by 232 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Hierarchical models have previously proven to capture complex relationships and dependencies among categories [35], and more importantly leverage prior knowledge and domain expertise from the hierarchical structure of the dataset [36].”
BackgroundBCN20000: Dermoscopic Lesions in the Wild
Hernández-Pérez, C., Combalia, M., Podlipnik, S., Codella, N., Rotemberg, V. M., Halpern, A. C., Reiter, O., Carrera, C., Barreiro, A., Helba, B., et al. (2024) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-024-03387-w · Cited by 224 · cited 1× · see citing works
“• The evaluation of AI models has been limited to datasets [13, 21, 22] that do not accurately represent real-world scenarios [23], lacking diversity and range in skin diseases.”
BackgroundMaron, R. C., Weichenthal, M., Utikal, J. S., Hekler, A., Berking, C., Hauschild, A., Enk, A. H., Haferkamp, S., Klode, J., Schadendorf, D., et al. (2019) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2019.06.013 · Cited by 219 · cited 1× · see citing works
“AI techniques, including deep learning and machine learning models, have demonstrated promising results [8, 9] and even outperformed dermatologists in certain tasks of skin cancer classification [10, 11].”
BackgroundComparison of Dermatologist Density Between Urban and Rural Counties in the United States
Feng, H., Berk-Krauss, J., Feng, P. W., & Stein, J. (2018) · JAMA Dermatology · doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.3022 · Cited by 211 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, the shortage of dermatologists [2], especially evident during the COVID-19 crisis, has led to their escalating consultation costs [3, 4].”
BackgroundA Benchmark for Automatic Visual Classification of Clinical Skin Disease Images
Sun, X., Yang, J., Sun, M., & Wang, K. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46466-4_13 · Cited by 197 · cited 1× · see citing works
“• AI models primarily use dermoscopic images [24], despite clinical skin photographs often being sufficient or even superior for diagnosing many common skin lesions [25].”
BackgroundArtificial Intelligence in Dermatology: Challenges and Perspectives
Liopyris, K., Gregoriou, S., Dias, J., & Stratigos, A. (2022) · Dermatology and Therapy · doi:10.1007/s13555-022-00833-8 · Cited by 195 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Despite these AI advancements [12–19], challenges remain in the adoption of AI for clinical decision-making [20].”
BackgroundChecklist for Evaluation of Image-Based Artificial Intelligence Reports in Dermatology
Daneshjou, R., Barata, C., Betz‐Stablein, B., Celebi, M. E., Codella, N., Combalia, M., Guitera, P., Gutman, D. A., Halpern, A. C., Helba, B., et al. (2021) · JAMA Dermatology · doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.4915 · Cited by 163 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Secondly, patient metadata was not available alongside the images for training our framework, and therefore we cannot quantify important clinical aspects of the data such as sex, age, skin tone and ethnicity [42].”
BackgroundSelf-citationSDE-Net: Equipping Deep Neural Networks with Uncertainty EstimatesPreprint
Kong, L., Sun, J.-M., & Zhang, C. (2020) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.10546 · Cited by 149 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We determined the OOD threshold t ood based on the values of FPR and TPR [49].”
MethodHow Does Mixup Help With Robustness and Generalization?Preprint
Zhang, L., Deng, Z., Kawaguchi, K., Ghorbani, A., & Zou, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.04819 · Cited by 134 · cited 2× · see citing works
“It is necessary to learn better decision boundaries to achieve OOD detection and clinical triage recommendation capabilities [39, 40].”
BackgroundAn, G., Akïba, M., Omodaka, K., Nakazawa, T., & Yokota, H. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-83503-7 · Cited by 76 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Hierarchical models have previously proven to capture complex relationships and dependencies among categories [35], and more importantly leverage prior knowledge and domain expertise from the hierarchical structure of the dataset [36].”
BackgroundJi‐Xu, A., Dinnes, J., & Matin, R. (2020) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.19759 · Cited by 46 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The evolution of skin imaging technology such as total body photographs [6] and dermoscopy [7], combined with AI methodologies, has led to rapid progression in image-based skin lesion diagnosis.”
MethodFogelberg, K., Chamarthi, S., Maron, R. C., et al. (2023) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.06968 · Cited by 36 · cited 1×
“AI models trained on images from a specific device can encounter domain shift [52, 53] issues when tested on external validation image sets from a different camera device.”
BackgroundFelmingham, C. M., MacNamara, S., Cranwell, W. C., Williams, N., Wada, M., Adler, N. R., Ge, Z., Sharfe, A., Bowling, A., Haskett, M., et al. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050203 · Cited by 32 · cited 1× · see citing works
“That being said, histopathology diagnosis is also prone to considerable variability [43], and prospective testing of similar models using dermatologists diagnosis as ground truth have shown to be successful [44].”
BackgroundSelf-citationDo we need to rethink the diagnoses melanoma in situ and severely dysplastic naevus?
Semsarian, C., Ma, T., Nickel, B., et al. (2022) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.21010 · Cited by 31 · cited 1×
“However, even considering a histopathological diagnosis, there is current debate as to whether melanoma in situ should in fact be classified as atypical or dysplastic as there is little to no evidence of melanoma in situ causing metastasis or death [50].”
BackgroundSelf-citationEvolution of the Clinical, Dermoscopic and Pathologic Diagnosis of Melanoma
Kittler, H. (2021) · Dermatology Practical & Conceptual · doi:10.5826/dpc.11s1a163s · Cited by 29 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The evolution of skin imaging technology such as total body photographs [6] and dermoscopy [7], combined with AI methodologies, has led to rapid progression in image-based skin lesion diagnosis.”
MethodOut-of-Distribution Detection for Medical Applications: Guidelines for Practical Evaluation
Zadorozhny, K., Thoral, P., Elbers, P., et al. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.14885 · Cited by 27 · cited 1×
“If an OOD alert is raised, the input image should be treated as an outlier and its original prediction should not be trusted, which is vital for medical AI applications [30] to mitigate potential misleading of clinicians [31].”
BackgroundEvaluation of Mobile Health Applications: Is Regulatory Policy Up to the Challenge?
Moshi, M. R., Parsons, J., Tooher, R. L., & Merlin, T. (2019) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462319000461 · Cited by 23 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In summary, our HOT model offers a comprehensive framework for diagnosing skin lesions and its integration has the potential to enhance end-user confidence and aid in making well-informed clinical diagnoses [33].”
MethodOut-of-Distribution Detection for Long-tailed and Fine-grained Skin Lesion Images
Mehta, D., Gal, Y., Bowling, A., et al. (2022) · International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.15186 · Cited by 22 · cited 1×
“We utilize the Molemap [34] dataset, which is a highly representative skin lesion dataset exhibiting skewed and long-tailed 2 distribution, and is fine-grained in nature.”
MethodSelf-citationMelanoma Detection by Non-Specialists: An Untapped Potential for Triage?
Cantisani, C., Ambrosio, L., Cucchi, C., et al. (2022) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics12112821 · Cited by 20 · cited 1×
“This inconsistency raises a question of whether to rely solely on an AI model’s diagnosis using a clinical lesion image or to obtain a dermoscopic image of the same lesion, leaving potential triage benefits unexplored [26, 27].”
BackgroundTognetti, L., Cartocci, A., Cinotti, É., et al. (2020) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.16847 · Cited by 13 · cited 1×
“This provides a more nuanced understanding compared to a single output diagnosis, particularly for challenging borderline cases such as differentiating benign naevi from melanoma based on the dermoscopic image [29].”
BackgroundHarkemanne, E., Legrand, C., Sawadogo, K. A., et al. (2023) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.19087 · Cited by 9 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This inconsistency raises a question of whether to rely solely on an AI model’s diagnosis using a clinical lesion image or to obtain a dermoscopic image of the same lesion, leaving potential triage benefits unexplored [26, 27].”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- [13][13] Codella, N.C., Gutman, D., Celebi, M.E., Helba, B., Marchetti, M.A., Dusza, S.W., Kalloo, A., Liopyris, K., Mishra, N., Kittler, H., et al. : Skin lesion analysis toward melanoma detection: A challenge at the 2017 international symposium on biomedical imaging (isbi), hosted by the international skin imaging collaboration (isic). In: 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018), pp. 168-172 (2018). IEEE -
- [15][15] Okuboyejo, D.A., Olugbara, O.O., Odunaike, S.A.: Automating skin disease diagnosis using image classification. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, vol. 2, pp. 850-854 (2013) -
- [21][21] Tschandl, P., Rosendahl, C., Kittler, H.: The ham10000 dataset, a large collection of multi-source dermatoscopic images of common pigmented skin lesions. Scientific data 5 (1), 1-9 (2018) -
- [23][23] Daneshjou, R., Vodrahalli, K., Novoa, R.A., Jenkins, M., Liang, W., - Rotemberg, V., Ko, J., Swetter, S.M., Bailey, E.E., Gevaert, O., et al. : Disparities in dermatology ai performance on a diverse, curated clinical image set. Science advances 8 (31), 6147 (2022) -
- [32][32] Brinker, T.J., Hekler, A., Utikal, J.S., Grabe, N., Schadendorf, D., Klode, - J., Berking, C., Steeb, T., Enk, A.H., Von Kalle, C.: Skin cancer classification using convolutional neural networks: systematic review. Journal of medical Internet research 20 (10), 11936 (2018) -
- [52][52] Shimodaira, H.: Improving predictive inference under covariate shift by weighting the log-likelihood function. Journal of statistical planning and inference 90 (2), 227-244 (2000)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Revolutionizing dermatopathology using AI in skin diagnostics: scoping review
Rammal, R., Mohy U Din, A., & Alam, T. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1614681 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“To tackle the OOD images and provide hierarchical classification in dermato-pathology, Mehta et al. (35) introduced the Hierarchical-Out Distribution-Clinical Triage (HOT) model.”
InfluentialSağlık Hizmetlerinde Yapay Zeka: Temel Kavramlar ve Sınıflandırmalar
Yönden, H. (2025) · Akademisyen Kitabevi eBooks · doi:10.37609/akya.3461
- Authors
- Mehta, D., Betz-Stablein, B., Nguyen, T. D., Gal, Y., Bowling, A., Haskett, M., Sashindranath, M., Bonnington, P., Mar, V., Soyer, H. P., & Ge, Z.
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2311.01009
- OpenAlex
- W4388329046
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- skin lesion diagnosis, out-of-distribution detection, dermoscopy, hierarchical prediction, multimodal image fusion, clinical decision support, rare skin lesion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review