PreprintCited by 67Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningArtificial Intelligence in Games

Kickstarting Deep Reinforcement Learning

Open access
Schmitt, Simon, Hudson, Jonathan J., Zidek, Augustin, Osindero, Simon, Doersch, Carl, Czarnecki, Wojciech M., Leibo, Joel Z., Kuttler, Heinrich +3 more·2018·arXiv

Abstract

We present a method for using previously-trained 'teacher' agents to kickstart the training of a new 'student' agent. To this end, we leverage ideas from policy distillation and population based training. Our method places no constraints on the architecture of the teacher or student agents, and it regulates itself to allow the students to surpass their teachers in performance. We show that, on a challenging and computationally-intensive multi-task benchmark (DMLab-30), kickstarted training improves the data efficiency of new agents, making it significantly easier to iterate on their design. We also show that the same kickstarting pipeline can allow a single student agent to leverage multiple 'expert' teachers which specialize on individual tasks. In this setting kickstarting yields surprisingly large gains, with the kickstarted agent matching the performance of an agent trained from scratch in almost 10x fewer steps, and surpassing its final performance by 42 percent. Kickstarting is conceptually simple and can easily be incorporated into reinforcement learning experiments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1803.03835

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Generational methods that exist explicitly optimise new generations with hand-crafted and explicit imitation learning techniques, as opposed to learning accumulation implicitly.

    “Generational methods that do exist, such as iterated policy distillation [Schmitt et al., 2018, Stooke et al., 2022] and expert iteration [Anthony et al., 2017], explicitly optimise new generations with hand-crafted and explicit imitation learning techniques, as opposed to learning accumulation implicitly, which should ultimately enable greater flexibility.”

    From Artificial Generational Intelligence: Cultural Accumulation in Reinforcement Learning (2024) · cites this paper as Schmitt et al., 2018

    Section 2 (p. 2) describes training a new student with an explicit loss that encourages its policy to match a teacher’s, supporting the imitation-based part of the claim. But the paper calls its method kickstarting, not iterated policy distillation, and does not describe successive generations. Section 2.3 (p. 4) says it uses population-based training to avoid hand-crafted loss-weight schedules. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Ba, Jimmy and Caruana, Rich. Do deep nets really need to be deep? In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27 , pp. 2654-2662, 2014.
  2. Beattie, Charles, Leibo, Joel Z., Teplyashin, Denis, Ward, Tom, Wainwright, Marcus, Kuttler, Heinrich, Lefrancq, Andrew, Green, Simon, Valdes, Victor, Sadik, Amir, Schrittwieser, Julian, Anderson, Keith, York, Sarah, Cant, Max, Cain, Adam, Bolton, Adrian, Gaffney, Stephen, King, Helen, Hassabis, Demis, Legg, Shane, and Petersen, Stig. DeepMind Lab. CoRR , abs/1612.03801, 2016. · arXiv
  3. Berseth, Glen, Xie, Cheng, Cernek, Paul, and Van de Panne, Michiel. Progressive reinforcement learning with distillation for multi-skilled motion control. ICLR , 2018.
  4. Bucilu, Cristian, Caruana, Rich, and Niculescu-Mizil, Alexandru. Model compression. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining . ACM, 2006.
  5. Carlson, Andrew, Betteridge, Justin, Kisiel, Bryan, Settles, Burr, Hruschka Jr, Estevam R, and Mitchell, Tom M. Toward an architecture for never-ending language learning. In AAAI , volume 5, pp. 3. Atlanta, 2010.
  6. Chen, Xinlei, Shrivastava, Abhinav, and Gupta, Abhinav. NEIL: Extracting visual knowledge from web data. In ICCV , pp. 1409-1416. IEEE, 2013.
  7. Espeholt, Lasse, Soyer, Hubert, Munos, Remi, Simonyan, Karen, Mnih, Volodymir, Ward, Tom, Doron, Yotam, Firoiu, Vlad, Harley, Tim, Dunning, Iain, Legg, Shane, and Kavukcuoglu, Koray. IMPALA: Scalable distributed deep-RL with importance weighted actor-learner architectures. arXiv:1802.01561 , 2018. · arXiv
  8. Girshick, Ross, Donahue, Jeff, Darrell, Trevor, and Malik, Jitendra. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pp. 580-587, 2014.
  9. Gulcehre, Caglar, Moczulski, Marcin, Visin, Francesco, and Bengio, Yoshua. Mollifying networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.04980 , 2016. · arXiv
  10. Henrich, Joseph. The secret of our success: how culture is driving human evolution, domesticating our species, and making us smarter . Princeton University Press, 2015.
  11. Hinton, Geoffrey, Vinyals, Oriol, and Dean, Jeff. Distilling the knowledge in a neural network. arXiv:1503.02531 , 2015. · arXiv
  12. Vinyals, Oriol, Green, Tim, Dunning, Iain, Simonyan, Karen, Fernando, Chrisantha, and Kavukcuoglu, Koray. Population based training of neural networks. CoRR , abs/1711.09846, 2017. · arXiv
  13. Leibo, Joel Z, d'Autume, Cyprien de Masson, Zoran, Daniel, Amos, David, Beattie, Charles, Anderson, Keith, Casta˜ neda, Antonio Garc´ ıa, Sanchez, Manuel, Green, Simon, Gruslys, Audrunas, et al. Psychlab: A psychology laboratory for deep reinforcement learning agents. arXiv:1801.08116 , 2018. · arXiv
  14. Mitchell, Tom M, Cohen, William W, Hruschka Jr, Estevam R, Talukdar, Partha Pratim, Betteridge, Justin, Carlson, Andrew, Mishra, Bhavana Dalvi, Gardner, Matthew, Kisiel, Bryan, Krishnamurthy, Jayant, et al. Never ending learning. In AAAI , pp. 2302-2310, 2015.
  15. Mnih, Volodymyr, Badia, Adri` a Puigdom` enech, Mirza, Mehdi, Graves, Alex, Lillicrap, Timothy P., Harley, Tim, Silver, David, and Kavukcuoglu, Koray. Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning. International Conference on Machine Learning , 2016.
  16. Mobahi, Hossein. Training recurrent neural networks by diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.04114 , 2016. · arXiv
  17. Parisotto, Emilio, Ba, Jimmy Lei, and Salakhutdinov, Ruslan. Actor-mimic: Deep multitask and transfer reinforcement learning. arXiv:1511.06342 , 2015. · arXiv
  18. Rusu, Andrei A., Colmenarejo, Sergio Gomez, G¨ ulc ¸ehre, C ¸ aglar, Desjardins, Guillaume, Kirkpatrick, James, Pascanu, Razvan, Mnih, Volodymyr, Kavukcuoglu, Koray, and Hadsell, Raia. Policy distillation. CoRR , abs/1511.06295, 2015. · arXiv
  19. Sutton, R.S. and Barto, A.G. Reinforcement learning: An introduction , volume 116. Cambridge Univ Press, 1998.
  20. Teh, Yee, Bapst, Victor, Czarnecki, Wojciech M, Quan, John, Kirkpatrick, James, Hadsell, Raia, Heess, Nicolas, and Pascanu, Razvan. Distral: Robust multitask reinforcement learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pp. 4499-4509, 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmitt, S., Hudson, J. J., Zidek, A., Osindero, S., Doersch, C., Czarnecki, W. M., Leibo, J. Z., Kuttler, H., Zisserman, A., Simonyan, K., & Eslami, S. M. A.
Affiliations
Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2789517807
Cited by
67
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
Keywords
deep reinforcement learning, teacher-student learning, policy distillation, population-based training, multi-task learning, data efficiency, expert teachers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review