PreprintCited by 383Visual Attention and Saliency DetectionAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

Learn To Pay Attention

Open access
Jetley, Saumya, Lord, Nicholas A., Lee, Namhoon, Torr, Philip H. S.·2018·arXiv

Abstract

We propose an end-to-end-trainable attention module for convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures built for image classification. The module takes as input the 2D feature vector maps which form the intermediate representations of the input image at different stages in the CNN pipeline, and outputs a 2D matrix of scores for each map. Standard CNN architectures are modified through the incorporation of this module, and trained under the constraint that a convex combination of the intermediate 2D feature vectors, as parameterised by the score matrices, must \textit{alone} be used for classification. Incentivised to amplify the relevant and suppress the irrelevant or misleading, the scores thus assume the role of attention values. Our experimental observations provide clear evidence to this effect: the learned attention maps neatly highlight the regions of interest while suppressing background clutter. Consequently, the proposed function is able to bootstrap standard CNN architectures for the task of image classification, demonstrating superior generalisation over 6 unseen benchmark datasets. When binarised, our attention maps outperform other CNN-based attention maps, traditional saliency maps, and top object proposals for weakly supervised segmentation as demonstrated on the Object Discovery dataset. We also demonstrate improved robustness against the fast gradient sign method of adversarial attack.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1804.02391

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trainable attention method highlighted where and in what proportion the network paid attention to input images for classification, and used this attention to further amplify relevant areas and suppress irrelevant areas.

    “Jetley et al. (2018) proposed a trainable attention mechanism. This trainable attention method highlighted where and in what proportion the network payed attention to input images for classification, and used this attention to further amplify relevant areas and suppress irrelevant areas.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jetley, S., Lord, N. A., Lee, N., & Torr, P. H. S.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2787420051
Cited by
383
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 9 · 2016: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Scholarworks@UNIST (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • International Conference on Learning Representations
Funders
  • Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (EP/N019474/1)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/M013774/1, ERC-2012-AdG 321162-HELIOS, Seebibyte EP/M013774/1, EP/N019474/1)
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (321162)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
attention maps, image classification, feature maps, region of interest, background suppression, saliency maps, weakly supervised segmentation, object discovery, adversarial robustness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review