CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 1

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Optically controlling the emission chirality of microlasers

Zambon, Nicola Carlon, St-Jean, Philippe, Milićević, Marijana, Lemaître, Aristide, Harouri, Abdelmounaim, LeGratiet, Luc, Bleu, Olivier, Solnyshkov, Dmitry, Malpuech, Guillaume, Sagnes, Isabelle, Ravets, Sylvain, Amo, Alberto, Bloch, Jacqueline·2018·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1806.04590arXiv 1806.04590
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Orbital angular momentum (OAM) carried by helical light beams is an unbounded degree of freedom of photons that offers a promising playground in modern photonics. So far, integrated sources of coherent light carrying OAM are based on resonators whose design imposes a single, non-tailorable chirality of the wavefront (i.e. clockwise or counter clockwise vortices). Here, we propose and demonstrate the realization of an integrated microlaser where the chirality of the wavefront can be optically controlled. Importantly, the scheme that we use, based on an effective spin-orbit coupling of photons in a semiconductor microcavity, can be extended to different laser architectures, thus paving the way to the realization of a new generation of OAM microlasers with tunable chirality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1806.04590

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ramping pump power above lasing threshold has been instrumental in resolving small spin-orbit coupling effects in hexagonal chains of micropillar resonators.

    “In the topological photonics context, in spite of these complications, ramping the pump power above lasing threshold has been instrumental in resolving small spinorbit coupling effects in hexagonal chains of micropillar resonators (Sala et al., 2015;Carlon Zambon et al., 2018).”

    From Topological photonics (2019) · cites this paper as Carlon Zambon et al., 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. L. Allen, M. W. Beijersbergen, R. J. C. Spreeuw, and J. P. Woerdman, Physical Review A 45, 8185 (1992). · DOI · Paper page
  2. R. Fickler, G. Campbell, B. Buchler, P. K. Lam, and A. Zeilinger, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences of the United States of America 113, 13642 (2016). · DOI
  3. G. Gibson, J. Courtial, M. J. Padgett, M. Vasnetsov, V. Pas'ko, S. M. Barnett, and S. Franke-Arnold, Optics Express 12, 5448 (2004). · DOI
  4. J. Wang, J.-Y. Yang, I. M. Fazal, N. Ahmed, Y. Yan, H. Huang, Y. Ren, Y. Yue, S. Dolinar, M. Tur, and A. E. Willner, Nature Photonics 6, 488 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  5. N. Bozinovic, Y. Yue, Y. Ren, M. Tur, P. Kristensen, H. Huang, A. E. Willner, and S. Ramachandran, Science (New York, N.Y.) 340, 1545 (2013). · DOI
  6. A. E. Willner, H. Huang, Y. Yan, Y. Ren, N. Ahmed, G. Xie, C. Bao, L. Li, Y. Cao, Z. Zhao, J. Wang, M. P. J. Lavery, M. Tur, S. Ramachandran, A. F. Molisch, N. Ashrafi, and S. Ashrafi, Advances in Optics and Pho- tonics 7, 66 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  7. S. Gröblacher, T. Jennewein, A. Vaziri, G. Weihs, and A. Zeilinger, New Journal of Physics 8, 75 (2006). · DOI
  8. G. Vallone, V. D'Ambrosio, A. Sponselli, S. Slussarenko, L. Marrucci, F. Sciarrino, and P. Villoresi, Physical Re- view Letters 113, 060503 (2014). · DOI
  9. A. Sit, F. Bouchard, R. Fickler, J. Gagnon-Bischoff, H. Larocque, K. Heshami, D. Elser, C. Peuntinger, K. Günthner, B. Heim, C. Marquardt, G. Leuchs, R. W. Boyd, and E. Karimi, Optica 4, 1006 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  10. J. Wang, S. Paesani, Y. Ding, R. Santagati, P. Skrzypczyk, A. Salavrakos, J. Tura, R. Augusiak, L. Mančinska, D. Bacco, D. Bonneau, J. W. Silverstone, Q. Gong, A. Acín, K. Rottwitt, L. K. Oxenløwe, J. L. O'Brien, A. Laing, and M. G. Thompson, Science (New York, N.Y.) 360, 285 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  11. M. Erhard, R. Fickler, M. Krenn, and A. Zeilinger, Light: Science & Applications 7, 17146 (2018). · DOI
  12. D. Kaszlikowski, P. Gnaciński, M. Żukowski, W. Mik- laszewski, and A. Zeilinger, Physical Review Letters 85, 4418 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  13. N. J. Cerf, M. Bourennane, A. Karlsson, and N. Gisin, Physical Review Letters 88, 127902 (2002). · DOI
  14. D. G. Grier, Nature 424, 810 (2003). · DOI
  15. M. Padgett and R. Bowman, Nature Photonics 5, 343 (2011). · DOI
  16. D. Gao, W. Ding, M. Nieto-Vesperinas, X. Ding, M. Rah- man, T. Zhang, C. Lim, and C.-W. Qiu, Light: Science & Applications 6, e17039 (2017). · DOI
  17. M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Reviews of Modern Physics 86, 1391 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  18. D. Collins, N. Gisin, N. Linden, S. Massar, and S. Popescu, Physical Review Letters 88, 040404 (2002). · DOI
  19. R. Fickler, R. Lapkiewicz, W. N. Plick, M. Krenn, C. Scha- eff, S. Ramelow, and A. Zeilinger, Science (New York, N.Y.) 338, 640 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  20. N. B. Simpson, K. Dholakia, L. Allen, and M. J. Padgett, Optics Letters 22, 52 (1997). · DOI
  21. P. Schemmel, G. Pisano, and B. Maffei, Optics Express 22, 14712 (2014). · DOI
  22. M. Mirhosseini, O. S. Magaña-Loaiza, C. Chen, B. Ro- denburg, M. Malik, and R. W. Boyd, Optics Express 21, 30196 (2013). · DOI
  23. D. Lin, P. Fan, E. Hasman, and M. L. Brongersma, Science (New York, N.Y.) 345, 298 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  24. A. Arbabi, Y. Horie, M. Bagheri, and A. Faraon, Nature Nanotechnology 10, 937 (2015). · DOI
  25. R. C. Devlin, A. Ambrosio, N. A. Rubin, J. P. B. Mueller, and F. Capasso, Science (New York, N.Y.) 358, 896 (2017). · DOI
  26. Y. Xu, J. Sun, J. Frantz, M. I. Shalaev, W. Walasik, A. Pandey, J. D. Myers, R. Y. Bekele, A. Tsuk- ernik, J. S. Sanghera, and N. M. Litchinitser, (2018), arXiv:1805.07327. · arXiv
  27. L. Marrucci, C. Manzo, and D. Paparo, Physical Review Letters 96, 163905 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  28. E. Karimi, B. Piccirillo, E. Nagali, L. Marrucci, and E. Santamato, Applied Physics Letters 94, 231124 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  29. R. Dall, M. D. Fraser, A. S. Desyatnikov, G. Li, S. Brod- beck, M. Kamp, C. Schneider, S. Höfling, and E. A. Os- trovskaya, Physical Review Letters 113, 200404 (2014). · DOI
  30. T. Gao, G. Li, E. Estrecho, T. Liew, D. Comber-Todd, A. Nalitov, M. Steger, K. West, L. Pfeiffer, D. Snoke, A. Kavokin, A. Truscott, and E. Ostrovskaya, Physical Review Letters 120, 065301 (2018). · DOI
  31. P. Miao, Z. Zhang, J. Sun, W. Walasik, S. Longhi, N. M. Litchinitser, and L. Feng, Science (New York, N.Y.) 353, 464 (2016). · DOI
  32. B. Peng, a. K. Özdemir, M. Liertzer, W. Chen, J. Kramer, H. Yılmaz, J. Wiersig, S. Rotter, and L. Yang, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113, 6845 (2016). · DOI
  33. V. Sala, D. Solnyshkov, I. Carusotto, T. Jacqmin, A. Lemaître, H. Terças, A. Nalitov, M. Abbarchi, E. Ga- lopin, I. Sagnes, J. Bloch, G. Malpuech, and A. Amo, Physical Review X 5, 011034 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  34. F. Cardano and L. Marrucci, Nature Photonics 9, 776 (2015). · DOI
  35. S. Michaelis de Vasconcellos, A. Calvar, A. Dousse, J. Suf- fczyński, N. Dupuis, A. Lemaître, I. Sagnes, J. Bloch, P. Voisin, and P. Senellart, Applied Physics Letters 99, 101103 (2011). · DOI
  36. G. Wang, A. Chernikov, M. M. Glazov, T. F. Heinz, X. Marie, T. Amand, and B. Urbaszek, Reviews of Modern Physics 90, 021001 (2018). · DOI
  37. A. Allain, J. Kang, K. Banerjee, and A. Kis, Nature Ma- terials 14, 1195 (2015). · DOI
  38. S. A. Wolf, D. D. Awschalom, R. A. Buhrman, J. M. Daughton, S. von Molnár, M. L. Roukes, A. Y. Chtchelka- nova, and D. M. Treger, Science (New York, N.Y.) 294, 1488 (2001). · DOI
  39. E. F. Fenton, A. Khan, P. Solano, L. A. Orozco, and F. K. Fatemi, Optics Letters 43, 1534 (2018). · DOI
  40. C. F. Fong, Y. Ota, S. Iwamoto, and Y. Arakawa, (2018), arXiv:1806.00223. · arXiv
  41. M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and A. A. Jorio, Group theory : application to the physics of condensed matter (Springer-Verlag, 2008) p. 582.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zambon, N. C., St-Jean, P., Milićević, M., Lemaître, A., Harouri, A., LeGratiet, L., Bleu, O., Solnyshkov, D., Malpuech, G., Sagnes, I., Ravets, S., Amo, A., & Bloch, J.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1806.04590
arXiv
1806.04590
References
0
Type
Preprint
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review