CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,943

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optical communications using orbital angular momentum beams

Willner, A. E., Huang, H., Yan, Y., Ren, Y., Ahmed, N., Xie, G., Bao, C., Li, L., Cao, Y., Zhao, Z., Wang, J., Lavery, M. P. J., Tur, M., Ramachandran, S., Molisch, A. F., Ashrafi, N., Ashrafi, S.·2015·Advances in Optics and Photonics
DOI 10.1364/aop.7.000066
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Orbital angular momentum (OAM), which describes the “phase twist” (helical phase pattern) of light beams, has recently gained interest due to its potential applications in many diverse areas. Particularly promising is the use of OAM for optical communications since: (i) coaxially propagating OAM beams with different azimuthal OAM states are mutually orthogonal, (ii) inter-beam crosstalk can be minimized, and (iii) the beams can be efficiently multiplexed and demultiplexed. As a result, multiple OAM states could be used as different carriers for multiplexing and transmitting multiple data streams, thereby potentially increasing the system capacity. In this paper, we review recent progress in OAM beam generation/detection, multiplexing/demultiplexing, and its potential applications in different scenarios including free-space optical communications, fiber-optic communications, and RF communications. Technical challenges and perspectives of OAM beams are also discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/aop.7.000066

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ease and versatility of spatial light modulators can be exploited in applications ranging from optical communication to holography-based optical tweezers.

    “The ease and versatility of SLMs can be exploited in many applications ranging from optical communication [55,56] to holography-based optical tweezers [57,58].”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [56]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 103

  1. Richardson, 2013, Nat. Photonics, 7, 354, 10.1038/nphoton.2013.94 · DOI
  2. Winzer, 2014, Nat. Photonics, 8, 345, 10.1038/nphoton.2014.58 · DOI
  3. Gibson, 2004, Opt. Express, 12, 5448, 10.1364/OPEX.12.005448 · DOI
  4. Yao, 2011, Adv. Opt. Photon., 3, 161, 10.1364/AOP.3.000161 · DOI
  5. Wang, 2012, Nat. Photonics, 6, 488, 10.1038/nphoton.2012.138 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bozinovic, 2013, Science, 340, 1545, 10.1126/science.1237861 · DOI
  7. Barnett, 1994, Opt. Commun., 110, 670, 10.1016/0030-4018(94)90269-0 · DOI
  8. Allen, 1999, Prog. Opt., 39, 291, 10.1016/S0079-6638(08)70391-3 · DOI
  9. Zhao, 2007, Phys. Rev. Lett., 99, 073901, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.073901 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Malik, 2012, Opt. Express, 20, 13195, 10.1364/OE.20.013195 · DOI
  11. Zhang, 2012, Opt. Express, 20, 26986, 10.1364/OE.20.026986 · DOI
  12. Shapiro, 2005, J. Opt. Netw., 4, 501, 10.1364/JON.4.000501 · DOI
  13. Zhu, 2011, Opt. Express, 19, 16665, 10.1364/OE.19.016665 · DOI
  14. Randel, 2011, Opt. Express, 19, 16697, 10.1364/OE.19.016697 · DOI
  15. Matsuo, 2012, Opt. Express, 20, 28398, 10.1364/OE.20.028398 · DOI
  16. Willner, 2012, Science, 337, 655, 10.1126/science.1225460 · DOI
  17. Vaughan, 1983, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 73, 1018, 10.1364/JOSA.73.001018 · DOI
  18. Lee, 2014, Opt. Express, 22, 5400, 10.1364/OE.22.005400 · DOI
  19. Bazhenov, 1990, JETP Lett., 52, 429
  20. Heckenberg, 1992, Opt. Lett., 17, 221, 10.1364/OL.17.000221 · DOI
  21. Mirhosseini, 2013, Opt. Express, 21, 30196, 10.1364/OE.21.030196 · DOI
  22. Yu, 2011, Science, 334, 333, 10.1126/science.1210713 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Karimi, 2014, Light Sci. Appl., 3, e167, 10.1038/lsa.2014.48 · DOI
  24. Zhao, 2013, Opt. Lett., 38, 932, 10.1364/OL.38.000932 · DOI
  25. Zeng, 2013, Sci. Rep., 3, 2826, 10.1038/srep02826 · DOI
  26. Beijersbergen, 1993, Opt. Commun., 96, 123, 10.1016/0030-4018(93)90535-D · DOI
  27. Oemrawsingh, 2004, Appl. Opt., 43, 688, 10.1364/AO.43.000688 · DOI
  28. Marrucci, 2011, J. Opt., 13, 064001, 10.1088/2040-8978/13/6/064001 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Bozinovic, 2012, Opt. Lett., 37, 2451, 10.1364/OL.37.002451 · DOI
  30. Yan, 2011, Opt. Lett., 36, 4269, 10.1364/OL.36.004269 · DOI
  31. Genevet, 2012, Nat. Commun., 3, 1278, 10.1038/ncomms2293 · DOI
  32. Beijersbergen, 1994, Opt. Commun., 112, 321, 10.1016/0030-4018(94)90638-6 · DOI
  33. Walter, 2015, Opt. Express, 23, 413, 10.1364/OE.23.000413 · DOI
  34. Shen, 2013, J. Opt., 15, 044005, 10.1088/2040-8978/15/4/044005 · DOI
  35. Maurer, 2007, New J. Phys., 9, 78, 10.1088/1367-2630/9/3/078 · DOI
  36. Kano, 2012, Int. J. Opt., 2012, 359141, 10.1155/2012/359141 · DOI
  37. Bisson, 2005, Laser Phys. Lett., 2, 327, 10.1002/lapl.200510008 · DOI
  38. Okida, 2007, Opt. Express, 15, 7616, 10.1364/OE.15.007616 · DOI
  39. Senatsky, 2012, Opt. Rev., 19, 201, 10.1007/s10043-012-0032-8 · DOI
  40. Cai, 2012, Science, 338, 363, 10.1126/science.1226528 · DOI
  41. Strain, 2014, Nat. Commun., 5, 4856, 10.1038/ncomms5856 · DOI
  42. Berkhout, 2010, Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, 153601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.153601 · DOI
  43. Leach, 2004, Phys. Rev. Lett., 92, 013601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.013601 · DOI
  44. Doerr, 2011, Opt. Lett., 36, 1209, 10.1364/OL.36.001209 · DOI
  45. Su, 2012, Opt. Express, 20, 9396, 10.1364/OE.20.009396 · DOI
  46. Karimi, 2009, Appl. Phys. Lett., 94, 231124, 10.1063/1.3154549 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Leach, 2002, Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 257901, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.257901 · DOI
  48. Lavery, 2012, Opt. Express, 20, 2110, 10.1364/OE.20.002110 · DOI
  49. Huang, 2014, Opt. Lett., 39, 1689, 10.1364/OL.39.001689 · DOI
  50. Guan, 2014, Opt. Express, 22, 145, 10.1364/OE.22.000145 · DOI
  51. Martelli, 2011, Electron. Lett., 47, 972, 10.1049/el.2011.1766 · DOI
  52. Huang, 2014, Opt. Lett., 39, 197, 10.1364/OL.39.000197 · DOI
  53. Krenn, 2014, New J. Phys., 16, 113028, 10.1088/1367-2630/16/11/113028 · DOI
  54. Paterson, 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 94, 153901, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.153901 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Tyler, 2009, Opt. Lett., 34, 142, 10.1364/OL.34.000142 · DOI
  56. Noll, 1976, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 66, 207, 10.1364/JOSA.66.000207 · DOI
  57. Anguita, 2008, Appl. Opt., 47, 2414, 10.1364/AO.47.002414 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Chandrasekaran, 2014, J. Lightwave Technol., 32, 1075, 10.1109/JLT.2013.2296851 · DOI
  59. Djordjevic, 2011, Opt. Express, 19, 14277, 10.1364/OE.19.014277 · DOI
  60. Rodenburg, 2012, Opt. Lett., 37, 3735, 10.1364/OL.37.003735 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Ren, 2013, Opt. Lett., 38, 4062, 10.1364/OL.38.004062 · DOI
  62. Polynkin, 2007, Opt. Lett., 32, 885, 10.1364/OL.32.000885 · DOI
  63. Andrews, 1997, Waves Random Media, 7, 229, 10.1088/0959-7174/7/2/005 · DOI
  64. Ren, 2014, Opt. Lett., 39, 2845, 10.1364/OL.39.002845 · DOI
  65. Millar, 2011, Opt. Express, 19, 8533, 10.1364/OE.19.008533 · DOI
  66. Huang, 2014, Opt. Lett., 39, 4360, 10.1364/OL.39.004360 · DOI
  67. Winzer, 2011, Opt. Express, 19, 16680, 10.1364/OE.19.016680 · DOI
  68. Edgar, 1969, J. Mod. Opt., 16, 281
  69. Torres, 2004, Opt. Lett., 29, 1939, 10.1364/OL.29.001939 · DOI
  70. Phillips, 1983, Appl. Opt, 22, 643, 10.1364/AO.22.000643 · DOI
  71. Farid, 2007, J. Lightwave Technol., 25, 1702, 10.1109/JLT.2007.899174 · DOI
  72. Berdagué, 1982, Appl. Opt., 21, 1950, 10.1364/AO.21.001950 · DOI
  73. Alexeyev, 1998, Semicond. Phys. Quantum Electron. Optoelectron., 1, 82, 10.15407/spqeo1.01.082 · DOI
  74. Ramachandran, 2009, Opt. Lett., 34, 2525, 10.1364/OL.34.002525 · DOI
  75. Gregg, 2015, Optica, 2, 267, 10.1364/OPTICA.2.000267 · DOI
  76. Ung, 2014, Opt. Express, 22, 18044, 10.1364/OE.22.018044 · DOI
  77. Yue, 2012, IEEE Photon. J., 4, 535, 10.1109/JPHOT.2012.2192474 · DOI
  78. Li, 2014, Sci. Rep., 4, 3853, 10.1038/srep03853 · DOI
  79. Ramachandran, 2015, Opt. Express, 23, 3721, 10.1364/OE.23.003721 · DOI
  80. Yue, 2013, Opt. Lett., 38, 5118, 10.1364/OL.38.005118 · DOI
  81. Ertel, 2006, J. Lightwave Technol., 24, 1674, 10.1109/JLT.2006.871025 · DOI
  82. Huang, 2013, Opt. Lett., 38, 5142, 10.1364/OL.38.005142 · DOI
  83. Yan, 2013, Opt. Lett., 38, 3930, 10.1364/OL.38.003930 · DOI
  84. Ahmed, 2014, Opt. Express, 22, 756, 10.1364/OE.22.000756 · DOI
  85. Willner, 2013, Opt. Lett., 38, 5240, 10.1364/OL.38.005240 · DOI
  86. Mair, 2001, Nature, 412, 313, 10.1038/35085529 · DOI · Paper page
  87. Molina-Terriza, 2007, Nat. Phys., 3, 305, 10.1038/nphys607 · DOI
  88. Walborn, 2006, Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, 090501, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.090501 · DOI
  89. Leach, 2012, Phys. Rev. A, 85, 060304, 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.060304 · DOI
  90. Lo, 2014, Nat. Photonics, 8, 595, 10.1038/nphoton.2014.149 · DOI
  91. Bourennane, 2002, J. Phys. A, 35, 10065, 10.1088/0305-4470/35/47/307 · DOI
  92. Vaziri, 2002, Phys. Rev. Lett., 89, 240401, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.240401 · DOI · Paper page
  93. Leach, 2010, Science, 329, 662, 10.1126/science.1190523 · DOI
  94. Vallone, 2014, Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, 060503, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.060503 · DOI
  95. Mirhosseini, 2013, Nat. Commun., 4, 2781, 10.1038/ncomms3781 · DOI
  96. Hamadou Ibrahim, 2013, Phys. Rev. A, 88, 012312, 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.012312 · DOI · Paper page
  97. Sasaki, 2008, Phys. Rev. Lett., 100, 124801, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.124801 · DOI
  98. Turnbull, 1996, Opt. Commun., 127, 183, 10.1016/0030-4018(96)00070-3 · DOI
  99. Thidé, 2007, Phys. Rev. Lett., 99, 087701, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.087701 · DOI
  100. Tamburini, 2012, New J. Phys., 14, 033001, 10.1088/1367-2630/14/3/033001 · DOI
  101. Yan, 2014, Nat. Commun., 5, 4876, 10.1038/ncomms5876 · DOI
  102. Paterson, 2001, Science, 292, 912, 10.1126/science.1058591 · DOI
  103. Bernet, 2006, Opt. Express, 14, 3792, 10.1364/OE.14.003792 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Willner, A. E., Huang, H., Yan, Y., Ren, Y., Ahmed, N., Xie, G., Bao, C., Li, L., Cao, Y., Zhao, Z., Wang, J., Lavery, M. P. J., Tur, M., Ramachandran, S., Molisch, A. F., Ashrafi, N., & Ashrafi, S.
Venue
Advances in Optics and Photonics
Publisher
Optica Publishing Group
Published
2015-03-31
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
66
ISSN
1943-8206
DOI
10.1364/aop.7.000066
Cited by
1,943
References
2
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review