CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 255Anomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningFault Detection and Control Systems

Generative Probabilistic Novelty Detection with Adversarial Autoencoders

Open access
Pidhorskyi, Stanislav, Almohsen, Ranya, Adjeroh, Donald A, Doretto, Gianfranco·2018·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1807.02588arXiv 1807.02588
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Novelty detection is the problem of identifying whether a new data point is considered to be an inlier or an outlier. We assume that training data is available to describe only the inlier distribution. Recent approaches primarily leverage deep encoder-decoder network architectures to compute a reconstruction error that is used to either compute a novelty score or to train a one-class classifier. While we too leverage a novel network of that kind, we take a probabilistic approach and effectively compute how likely is that a sample was generated by the inlier distribution. We achieve this with two main contributions. First, we make the computation of the novelty probability feasible because we linearize the parameterized manifold capturing the underlying structure of the inlier distribution, and show how the probability factorizes and can be computed with respect to local coordinates of the manifold tangent space. Second, we improved the training of the autoencoder network. An extensive set of results show that the approach achieves state-of-the-art results on several benchmark datasets.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1807.02588

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PatchCore introduces greedy coreset subsampling for nominal feature banks to reduce redundancy and bring down storage memory and inference time.

    “Finally, for practical applicability, PatchCore additionally introduces greedy coreset subsampling [1] for nominal feature banks as a key element to both reduce redundancy in the extracted, patch-level memory bank as well as significantly bringing down storage memory and inference time, making PatchCore very attractive for realistic industrial use cases.”

    From Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detection (2022) · cites this paper as [1]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Pidhorskyi, S., Almohsen, R., Adjeroh, D. A., & Doretto, G.
Affiliations
West Virginia University (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
Volume
31
Pages
6823-6834
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1807.02588
arXiv
1807.02588
OpenAlex
W2860343088
Cited by
255
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 15
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • neural information processing systems
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
Keywords
novelty detection, outlier detection, probabilistic generative models, adversarial autoencoder, tangent space, reconstruction error, one-class classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review