The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Low rank representations for quantum simulation of electronic structure
Open accessAbstract
The quantum simulation of quantum chemistry is a promising application of quantum computers. However, for N molecular orbitals, the $\mathcal{O}(N^4)$ gate complexity of performing Hamiltonian and unitary Coupled Cluster Trotter steps makes simulation based on such primitives challenging. We substantially reduce the gate complexity of such primitives through a two-step low-rank factorization of the Hamiltonian and cluster operator, accompanied by truncation of small terms. Using truncations that incur errors below chemical accuracy, we are able to perform Trotter steps of the arbitrary basis electronic structure Hamiltonian with $\mathcal{O}(N^3)$ gate complexity in small simulations, which reduces to $\mathcal{O}(N^2 \log N)$ gate complexity in the asymptotic regime, while our unitary Coupled Cluster Trotter step has $\mathcal{O}(N^3)$ gate complexity as a function of increasing basis size for a given molecule. In the case of the Hamiltonian Trotter step, these circuits have $\mathcal{O}(N^2)$ depth on a linearly connected array, an improvement over the $\mathcal{O}(N^3)$ scaling assuming no truncation. As a practical example, we show that a chemically accurate Hamiltonian Trotter step for a 50 qubit molecular simulation can be carried out in the molecular orbital basis with as few as 4,000 layers of parallel nearest-neighbor two-qubit gates, consisting of fewer than 100,000 non-Clifford rotations. We also apply our algorithm to iron-sulfur clusters relevant for elucidating the mode of action of metalloenzymes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Heuristic or greedy approximations that seek to add one term at a time have been shown to be helpful for the sparse model problem of optimizing circuit structure.
“One can then view this problem as a sparse model problem, and whereas such an optimization is known to be hard, heuristic or greedy approximations that seek to add one term at a time have been shown to be helpful [31, 32].”
From Variational quantum algorithms (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
The Double-decomposition structure and Accuracy of low-rank approximations sections describe truncating terms to obtain approximate operators with reduced gate counts. The paper does not show a heuristic or greedy method that adds one term at a time to optimize circuit structure (searched: greedy, sequential term selection, and Cholesky decomposition). (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredNear-term VQAs for analyzing strong correlation problems are aimed at reducing circuit depth by using smart initializations or optimizing circuit structure.
“In contrast, near-term VQAs for analyzing strong correlation problem are aimed at reducing the circuit depth by using smart initializations [267], or by optimizing the circuit structure itself [31, 32].”
From Variational quantum algorithms (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- Kitaev, A. Y. Quantum measurements and the Abelian stabilizer problem. Elec- tron. Colloquium Comput. Complex. 3, Preprint at: http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/ 9511026 (1996).
- Abrams, D. S. & Lloyd, S. Quantum algorithm providing exponential speed increase for finding eigenvalues and eigenvectors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5162 (1999).
- Aspuru-Guzik, A., Dutoi, A. D., Love, P. J. & Head-Gordon, M. Simulated quantum computation of molecular energies. Science 309, 1704 (2005).
- Farhi, E. et al. A quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm applied to random instances of an NP-complete problem. Science 292, 472 (2001).
- Wu, L.-A., Byrd, M. & Lidar, D. Polynomial-time simulation of pairing models on a quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 057904 (2002).
- Babbush, R., Love, P. J. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Adiabatic quantum simulation of quantum chemistry. Sci. Rep. 4, 6603 (2014).
- Peruzzo, A. et al. A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum pro- cessor. Nat. Commun. 5, 4213 (2014).
- O'Malley, P. J. et al. Scalable quantum simulation of molecular energies. Phys. Rev. X 6, 031007 (2016).
- Kutzelnigg, W. Quantum chemistry in Fock space. I. The universal wave and energy operators. J. Chem. Phys. 77, 3081 (1982).
- Yanai, T. & Chan, G. K.-L. Canonical transformation theory for multireference problems. J. Chem. Phys. 124, 194106 (2006).
- Romero, J. et al. Strategies for quantum computing molecular energies using the unitary coupled cluster ansatz. Quantum Sci. Technol. 4, 014008 (2018).
- Farhi, E., Goldstone, J. & Gutmann, S. A quantum approximate optimization algorithm. Preprint at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.4028 (2014). · arXiv
- Berry, D. W., Childs, A. M., Cleve, R., Kothari, R. & Somma, R. D. Simulating Hamiltonian dynamics with a truncated Taylor series. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 090502 (2015).
- Low, G. H. & Chuang, I. L. Hamiltonian simulation by qubitization. Quantum 3, 163 (2019).
- Low, G. H. & Wiebe, N. Hamiltonian simulation in the interaction picture. Preprint at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.00675 (2018). · arXiv
- Seeley, J. T., Richard, M. J. & Love, P. J. The Bravyi-Kitaev transformation for quantum computation of electronic structure. J. Chem. Phys. 137, 224109 (2012).
- Kivlichan, I. D. et al. Quantum simulation of electronic structure with linear depth and connectivity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 110501 (2018).
- Jiang, Z., Sung, K. J., Kechedzhi, K., Smelyanskiy, V. N. & Boixo, S. Quantum algorithms to simulate many-body physics of correlated fermions. Phys. Rev. Appl. 9, 044036 (2018).
- Peng, B. & Kowalski, K. Highly efficient and scalable compound decomposition of two-electron integral tensor and its application in coupled cluster calculations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 4179 (2017).
- Reiher, M., Wiebe, N., Svore, K. M., Wecker, D. & Troyer, M. Elucidating reaction mechanisms on quantum computers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 114, 7555 (2017).
- Whitten, J. L. Coulombic potential energy integrals and approximations. J. Chem. Phys. 58, 4496 (1973).
- Hohenstein, E. G. & Sherrill, C. D. Density fitting and Cholesky decomposition approximations in symmetry-adapted perturbation theory: Implementation and application to probe the nature of π-π interactions in linear acenes. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 184111 (2010).
- Beebe, N. H. & Linderberg, J. Simplifications in the generation and transformation of two-electron integrals in molecular calculations. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 12, 683 (1977).
- Koch, H., Sánchez de Merás, A. & Pedersen, T. B. Reduced scaling in electronic structure calculations using Cholesky decompositions. J. Chem. Phys. 118, 9481 (2003).
- Aquilante, F. et al. MOLCAS 7: the next generation. J. Comput. Chem. 31, 224 (2010).
- Purwanto, W., Krakauer, H., Virgus, Y. & Zhang, S. Assessing weak hydrogen binding on Ca + centers: An accurate many-body study with large basis sets. J. Chem. Phys. 135, 164105 (2011).
- Motta, M. & Zhang, S. Ab initio computations of molecular systems by the auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo method. Wires Comput. Mol. Sci. 8, e1364 (2018).
- Folkestad, S. D., Kjønstad, E. F. & Koch, H. An efficient algorithm for Cholesky decomposition of electron repulsion integrals. J. Chem. Phys. 150, 194112 (2019).
- Petersson, G. A., Malick, D. K., Frisch, M. J. & Braunstein, M. The convergence of complete active space self-consistent-field energies to the complete basis set limit. J. Chem. Phys. 123, 074111 (2005).
- Niu, M. Y., Boixo, S., Smelyanskiy, V. N. & Neven, H. Universal quantum control through deep reinforcement learning. npj Quantum Inf. 5, 33 (2019).
- Fowler, A. G., Mariantoni, M., Martinis, J. M. & Cleland, A. N. Surface codes: towards practical large-scale quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 86, 032324 (2012).
- Bocharov, A., Roetteler, M. & Svore, K. M. Efficient synthesis of universal repeat- until-success quantum circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 080502 (2015).
- Kivlichan, I. D. et al. Improved fault-tolerant quantum simulation of condensed- phase correlated electrons via Trotterization. Quantum 4, 296 (2020).
- Arute, F. et al. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574, 505 (2019).
- Childs, A. M., Maslov, D., Nam, Y., Ross, N. J. & Su, Y. Toward the first quantum simulation with quantum speedup. P. Natl Acad. Sci. 115, 9456 (2018).
- Shenvi, N. et al. The tensor hypercontracted parametric reduced density matrix algorithm: Coupled-cluster accuracy with o(r 4 ) scaling. J. Chem. Phys. 139, 054110 (2013).
- Matsuzawa, Y. & Kurashige, Y. Jastrow-type decomposition in quantum chemistry for low-depth quantum circuits. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 16, 944 (2020).
- Berry, D. W., Gidney, C., Motta, M., McClean, J. R. & Babbush, R. Qubitization of arbitrary basis quantum chemistry leveraging sparsity and low rank factorization. Quantum 3, 208 (2019).
- von Burg, V. et al. Quantum computing enhanced computational catalysis. Pre- print at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.14460.pdf (2020). · arXiv
- Huggins, W. J. et al. Efficient and noise resilient measurements for quantum chemistry on near-term quantum computers. npj Quantum Inf. 7, 23 (2021).
- Yen, T.-C. & Izmaylov, A. F. Cartan sub-algebra approach to efficient measurements of quantum observables. Preprint at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.01234 (2020). · arXiv
- Sun, Q. et al. PySCF: the Python-based simulations of chemistry framework. Wires Comput. Mol. Sci. 8, e1340 (2018).
- White, S. R. Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992).
- Chan, G. K.-L. & Head-Gordon, M. Highly correlated calculations with a polynomial cost algorithm: A study of the density matrix renormalization group. J. Chem. Phys. 116, 4462 (2002).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Variational quantum algorithms
Cerezo, M., Arrasmith, A., Babbush, R., Benjamin, S. C., Endo, S., Fujii, K., McClean, J. R., Mitarai, K., Yuan, X., Cincio, L., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00348-9 · Cited by 3,385
Self-citationQuantum computational chemistry
McArdle, S., Endo, S., Aspuru-Guzik, A., Benjamin, S. C., & Yuan, X. (2020) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.015003 · Cited by 1,621
Metadata
- Authors
- Motta, M., Ye, E., McClean, J. R., Li, Z., Minnich, A. J., Babbush, R., & Chan, G. K.-L.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Google (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ye, Erika
- Babbush, Ryan
- Chan, Garnet Kin-Lic
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2056-6387 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1808.02625
- OpenAlex
- W2887293896
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 9.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- lv
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- npj Quantum Information (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1254213, 1839204, CAREER)
- Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems (1254213)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Keywords
- low-rank factorization, Hamiltonian truncation, unitary coupled cluster, gate complexity, quantum circuit depth, iron-sulfur clusters, metalloenzymes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review