Generalization and Regularization in DQN
Open accessAbstract
Deep reinforcement learning algorithms have shown an impressive ability to learn complex control policies in high-dimensional tasks. However, despite the ever-increasing performance on popular benchmarks, policies learned by deep reinforcement learning algorithms can struggle to generalize when evaluated in remarkably similar environments. In this paper we propose a protocol to evaluate generalization in reinforcement learning through different modes of Atari 2600 games. With that protocol we assess the generalization capabilities of DQN, one of the most traditional deep reinforcement learning algorithms, and we provide evidence suggesting that DQN overspecializes to the training environment. We then comprehensively evaluate the impact of dropout and $\ell_2$ regularization, as well as the impact of reusing learned representations to improve the generalization capabilities of DQN. Despite regularization being largely underutilized in deep reinforcement learning, we show that it can, in fact, help DQN learn more general features. These features can be reused and fine-tuned on similar tasks, considerably improving DQN's sample efficiency.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Even minor changes to the environment can cause substantial degradation in agent performance.
“even minor changes to the environment can cause substantial degradation in agent performance”
From A Study of Global and Episodic Bonuses for Exploration in Contextual MDPs (2023) · cites this paper as Farebrother et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks
Kirkpatrick, J., Pascanu, R., Rabinowitz, N., Veness, J., Desjardins, G., Rusu, A. A., Milan, K., Quan, J., Ramalho, T., Grabska-Barwinska, A., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1611835114 · Cited by 7,899 · see citing works
How transferable are features in deep neural networks?
Yosinski, J., Clune, J., Bengio, Y., & Lipson, H. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1411.1792 · Cited by 6,061 · see citing works
Deep Reinforcement Learning That Matters
Henderson, P., Islam, R., Bachman, P., Pineau, J., Precup, D., & Meger, D. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11694 · Cited by 1,685 · see citing works
Machado, M. C., Bellemare, M. G., Talvitie, E., Veness, J., Hausknecht, M., & Bowling, M. (2018) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.5699 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Self-citationProtecting against evaluation overfitting in empirical reinforcement learning
Whiteson, S., Tanner, B., Taylor, M. E., & Stone, P. (2011) · 2011 IEEE Symposium on Adaptive Dynamic Programming and Reinforcement Learning (ADPRL) · doi:10.1109/adprl.2011.5967363 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Marcin Andrychowicz, Dwight Crow, Alex Ray, Jonas Schneider, Rachel Fong, Peter Welinder, Bob McGrew, Josh Tobin, Pieter Abbeel, and Wojciech Zaremba. 2017. Hindsight Experience Replay. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) . 5048-5058.
- Marc G. Bellemare, Yavar Naddaf, Joel Veness, and Michael Bowling. 2013. The Arcade Learning Environment: An Evaluation Platform for General Agents. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 47 (2013), 253-279.
- Karl Cobbe, Oleg Klimov, Christopher Hesse, Taehoon Kim, and John Schulman. 2019. Quantifying Generalization in Reinforcement Learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) . 1282-1289.
- Laurent Dinh, Razvan Pascanu, Samy Bengio, and Yoshua Bengio. 2017. Sharp Minima Can Generalize For Deep Nets. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) . 1019-1028.
- Lasse Espeholt, Hubert Soyer, R´ emi Munos, Karen Simonyan, Volodymyr Mnih, Tom Ward, Yotam Doron, Vlad Firoiu, Tim Harley, Iain Dunning, Shane Legg, and Koray Kavukcuoglu. 2018. IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architectures. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) . 1406-1415.
- Amir Massoud Farahmand, Mohammad Ghavamzadeh, Csaba Szepesv´ ari, and Shie Mannor. 2008. Regularized Policy Iteration. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) . 441-448.
- Chelsea Finn, Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. 2017. Model-Agnostic MetaLearning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) . 1126-1135.
- Xavier Glorot and Yoshua Bengio. 2010. Understanding the Difficulty of Training Deep Feedforward Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS) . 249-256.
- Jeremy Howard and Sebastian Ruder. 2018. Fine-tuned Language Models for Text Classification. CoRR abs/1801.06146 (2018). · arXiv
- Arthur Juliani, Ahmed Khalifa, Vincent-Pierre Berges, Jonathan Harper, Ervin Teng, Hunter Henry, Adam Crespi, Julian Togelius, and Danny Lange. 2019. Obstacle Tower: A Generalization Challenge in Vision, Control, and Planning. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) . 2684-2691.
- Niels Justesen, Ruben Rodriguez Torrado, Philip Bontrager, Ahmed Khalifa, Julian Togelius, and Sebastian Risi. 2018. Procedural Level Generation Improves Generality of Deep Reinforcement Learning. CoRR abs/1806.10729 (2018). · arXiv
- J. Zico Kolter and Andrew Y. Ng. 2009. Regularization and Feature Selection in Least-Squares Temporal Difference Learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) . 521-528.
- Yann Lecun, L´ eon Bottou, Yoshua Bengio, and Patrick Haffner. 1998. Gradientbased Learning Applied to Document Recognition. IEEE 86, 11 (1998), 2278-2324.
- Jonathan Long, Evan Shelhamer, and Trevor Darrell. 2015. Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) . 3431-3440.
- Volodymyr Mnih, Koray Kavukcuoglu, David Silver, Andrei A. Rusu, Joel Veness, Marc G. Bellemare, Alex Graves, Martin A. Riedmiller, Andreas Fidjeland, Georg Ostrovski, Stig Petersen, Charles Beattie, Amir Sadik, Ioannis Antonoglou, Helen King, Dharshan Kumaran, Daan Wierstra, Shane Legg, and Demis Hassabis. 2015. Human-Level Control through Deep Reinforcement Learning. Nature 518, 7540 (2015), 529-533.
- Lili Mou, Zhao Meng, Rui Yan, Ge Li, Yan Xu, Lu Zhang, and Zhi Jin. 2016. How Transferable are Neural Networks in NLP Applications?. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) . 479-489.
- Alex Nichol, Joshua Achiam, and John Schulman. 2018a. On First-Order MetaLearning Algorithms. CoRR abs/1803.02999 (2018). · arXiv
- Alex Nichol, Vicki Pfau, Christopher Hesse, Oleg Klimov, and John Schulman. 2018b. Gotta Learn Fast: A New Benchmark for Generalization in RL. CoRR abs/1804.03720 (2018). · arXiv
- Emilio Parisotto, Lei Jimmy Ba, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2016. Actor-Mimic: Deep Multitask and Transfer Reinforcement Learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) .
- Aravind Rajeswaran, Kendall Lowrey, Emanuel Todorov, and Sham M. Kakade. 2017. Towards Generalization and Simplicity in Continuous Control. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) . 6550-6561.
- Ali Sharif Razavian, Hossein Azizpour, Josephine Sullivan, and Stefan Carlsson. 2014. CNN Features Off-the-Shelf: An Astounding Baseline for Recognition. In Workshops of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) . 512-519.
- Andrei A. Rusu, Neil C. Rabinowitz, Guillaume Desjardins, Hubert Soyer, James Kirkpatrick, Koray Kavukcuoglu, Razvan Pascanu, and Raia Hadsell. 2016. Progressive Neural Networks. CoRR abs/1606.04671 (2016). · arXiv
- Jonathan Schwarz, Wojciech Czarnecki, Jelena Luketina, Agnieszka GrabskaBarwinska, Yee Whye Teh, Razvan Pascanu, and Raia Hadsell. 2018. Progress & Compress: A Scalable Framework for Continual Learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) . 4535-4544.
- David Silver, Aja Huang, Chris J. Maddison, Arthur Guez, Laurent Sifre, George van den Driessche, Julian Schrittwieser, Ioannis Antonoglou, Vedavyas Panneershelvam, Marc Lanctot, Sander Dieleman, Dominik Grewe, John Nham, Nal Kalchbrenner, Ilya Sutskever, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Madeleine Leach, Koray Kavukcuoglu, Thore Graepel, and Demis Hassabis. 2016. Mastering the Game of Go with Deep Neural Networks and Tree Search. Nature 529, 7587 (2016), 484-489.
- Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey E. Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2014. Dropout: a Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research 15, 1 (2014), 1929-1958.
- Richard S. Sutton. 1995. Generalization in Reinforcement Learning: Successful Examples Using Sparse Coarse Coding. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) . 1038-1044.
- Yee Whye Teh, Victor Bapst, Wojciech M. Czarnecki, John Quan, James Kirkpatrick, Raia Hadsell, Nicolas Heess, and Razvan Pascanu. 2017. Distral: Robust Multitask Reinforcement Learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) . 4496-4506.
- Sam Witty, Jun Ki Lee, Emma Tosch, Akanksha Atrey, Michael L. Littman, and David D. Jensen. 2018. Measuring and Characterizing Generalization in Deep Reinforcement Learning. CoRR abs/1812.02868 (2018). · arXiv
- Amy Zhang, Nicolas Ballas, and Joelle Pineau. 2018a. A Dissection of Overfitting and Generalization in Continuous Reinforcement Learning. CoRR abs/1806.07937 (2018). · arXiv
- Chiyuan Zhang, Oriol Vinyals, R´ emi Munos, and Samy Bengio. 2018b. A Study on Overfitting in Deep Reinforcement Learning. CoRR abs/1804.06893 (2018). · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Domain Generalization with MixStylePreprint
Zhou, K., Yang, Y., Qiao, Y., & Xiang, T. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.02008 · Cited by 606 · see citing works
“A natural way to improve generalization, which has been shown effective in (Cobbe et al., 2019; Farebrother et al., 2018), is to use regularization, e.g., weight decay.”
BackgroundThe rise and potential of large language model based agents: a survey
Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jin, S., Zhou, E., et al. (2025) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-024-4222-0 · Cited by 970 · see citing works
Quantifying Generalization in Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Cobbe, K., Klimov, O., Hesse, C., Kim, T., & Schulman, J. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.02341 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
“(Farebrother et al., 2018) also address this problem, accurately recognizing that conflating train and test environments has contributed to the lack of regularization in deep RL.”
BackgroundActive Domain RandomizationPreprint
Mehta, B., Diaz, M., Golemo, F., Pal, C., & Paull, L. (2019) · Conference on Robot Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.04762 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
“Generalization in RL has long been one of the holy grails of the field, and recent work like Packer et al. (2018), Cobbe et al. (2018), and Farebrother et al. (2018) highlight the tendency of deep RL policies to overfit to details of the training environment.”
BackgroundImage Augmentation Is All You Need: Regularizing Deep Reinforcement Learning from Pixels
Kostrikov, I., Yarats, D., & Fergus, R. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.13649 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
“using dropout (Farebrother et al., 2018) and cutout (Cobbe et al.”
MethodThe Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey
Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jin, S., Zhou, E., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.07864 · Cited by 972 · see citing works
Towards Continual Reinforcement Learning: A Review and Perspectives
Khetarpal, K., Riemer, M., Rish, I., & Precup, D. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.13490 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
“Generalization in RL has been investigated by creating different game modes (Farebrother, Machado, and Bowling, 2018) and game levels (Nichol, Pfau, Hesse, Klimov, and Schulman, 2018) for training and testing, by exposing internal parameters of various classic environments (Packer, Gao, Kos,…”
BackgroundMixStyle Neural Networks for Domain Generalization and Adaptation
Zhou, K., Yang, Y., Qiao, Y., & Xiang, T. (2023) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-023-01913-8 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
“A nat-ural way to improve generalization, which has been shown effective in several studies [5,15], is to impose regularization, such as weight decay.”
Towards Continual Reinforcement Learning: A Review and Perspectives
Khetarpal, K., Riemer, M., Rish, I., & Precup, D. (2022) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.13673 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Contrastive Behavioral Similarity Embeddings for Generalization in Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Agarwal, R., Machado, M. C., Castro, P. S., & Bellemare, M. G. (2021) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.05265 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
“…; with the community highlighting that deep RL agents tend to overfit to the environments they are trained on (Cobbe et al., 2019; Witty et al., 2018; Farebrother et al., 2018; Juliani et al., 2019; Kostrikov et al., 2020; Song et al., 2019; Justesen et al., 2018; Packer et al., 2018).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationA Survey of Generalisation in Deep Reinforcement Learning
Kirk, R., Zhang, A., Grefenstette, E., & Rocktäschel, T. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.09794 · Cited by 198
“This has resulted in policies that perform badly on even slightly adjusted environment instances (specific levels or tasks within an environment) and often fail on unseen random seeds used for initialisation (Zhang et al., 2018, 2018b; Farebrother et al., 2020; Gamrian & Goldberg, 2019).”
BackgroundLeveraging Procedural Generation to Benchmark Reinforcement Learning
Cobbe, K., Hesse, C., Hilton, J., & Schulman, J. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.01588 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
“There have been several investigations of generalization in RL (Farebrother et al., 2018; Packer et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018a; Lee et al., 2019), but progress has largely proved elusive.”
BackgroundA Survey of Zero-shot Generalisation in Deep Reinforcement Learning
Kirk, R., Zhang, A., Grefenstette, E., & Rocktäschel, T. (2023) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.14174 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
“This has resulted in policies that perform badly on even slightly adjusted environment instances (specific levels or tasks within an environment) and often fail on unseen random seeds used for initialisation (Zhang et al., 2018, 2018b; Farebrother et al., 2020; Gamrian & Goldberg, 2019).”
BackgroundStabilizing Deep Q-Learning with ConvNets and Vision Transformers under Data AugmentationPreprint
Hansen, N., Su, H., & Wang, X.-L. (2021) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.00644 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
“However, it is still very challenging for current methods to generalize the learned skills to novel environments, and policies trained by RL can easily overfit to the training environment [81, 13], especially for high-dimensional observation spaces such as images [8, 58].”
BackgroundStop Regressing: Training Value Functions via Classification for Scalable Deep RL
Farebrother, J., Orbay, J., Vuong, Q., Taiga, A. A., Chebotar, Y., Xiao, T., Irpan, A., Levine, S., Castro, P. S., Faust, A., et al. (2024) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.03950 · Cited by 179
“Following Ali Taïga et al. (2023), we train a multi-task policy capable of playing Atari game variants with different environment dynamics and rewards (Farebrother et al., 2018).”
MethodSelf-citationScaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization in Direct Alignment Algorithms
Rafailov, R., Chittepu, Y., Park, R., Sikchi, H. S., Hejna, J., Knox, W. B., Finn, C., & Niekum, S. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.02900 · Cited by 177
“Over-fitting can be characterized as over-optimization in the supervised learning setting [39, 32], which can harm generalization [19, 12, 24] or lead to susceptibility to adversarial attacks [56, 37, 15].”
Improving Generalization in Reinforcement Learning with Mixture RegularizationPreprint
Wang, K.-X., Kang, B.-Y., Shao, J., & Feng, J. (2020) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.10814 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
“We compare mixreg with three best-performing data augmentation techniques (i.e. cutout-color, random crop, random convolution) in [12], and two regularization techniques (i.e. batch normalization [10] and (cid:96) 2 regularization) adopted in previous works [3, 6].”
MethodInfluentialDeep Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Li, Y. (2018) · Reinforcement Learning for Cyber-Physical Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.06339 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Automatic Data Augmentation for Generalization in Deep Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Răileanu, R., Goldstein, M., Yarats, D., Kostrikov, I., & Fergus, R. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.12862 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
“Farebrother et al. [17] and Cobbe et al. [11] show that such regularization methods can improve the generalization ability of RL agents in Atari [39] and CoinRun [11], respectively.”
BackgroundMethodDecoupling Value and Policy for Generalization in Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Răileanu, R., & Fergus, R. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.10330 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Deep Reinforcement and InfoMax LearningPreprint
Mazoure, B., Combes, R. T. D., Doan, T., Bachman, P., & Hjelm, R. D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.07217 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“Despite success on many benchmarks, model-free agents typically generalize poorly when the environment or reward function changes [Farebrother et al., 2018, Tachet des Combes et al., 2018] and can have high sample complexity.”
BackgroundOne Solution is Not All You Need: Few-Shot Extrapolation via Structured MaxEnt RLPreprint
Kumar, S., Kumar, A., Levine, S., & Finn, C. (2020) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.14484 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
“A natural approach to resolving this issue is to simply train the agent on a distribution of environments that correspond to variations of the training environment [3, 8, 17, 32].”
BackgroundTowards Generalization in Target-Driven Visual Navigation by Using Deep Reinforcement Learning
Devo, A., Mezzetti, G., Costante, G., Fravolini, M., & Valigi, P. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2020.2994002 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
“RL algorithms, however, show a great tendency to overfit in the domain in which they are trained [23], [24].”
BackgroundOn the Generalization Gap in Reparameterizable Reinforcement Learning
Wang, H., Zheng, S., Xiong, C., & Socher, R. (2019) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.12654 · Cited by 98
“On the other hand, Farebrother et al. (2018); Justesen et al. (2018); Cobbe et al. (2018) allowed the test environment to vary from training, and observed huge differences in testing performance.”
BackgroundDiscount Factor as a Regularizer in Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Amit, R., Meir, R., & Ciosek, K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.02040 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“Farebrother et al. (2018) showed regularization can improve generalization in Atari benchmarks when using the DQN algorithm (Mnih et al., 2015).”
MethodSECANT: Self-Expert Cloning for Zero-Shot Generalization of Visual PoliciesPreprint
Fan, L. (., Wang, G., Huang, D.-A., Yu, Z.-D., Fei-Fei, L., Zhu, Y., & Anandkumar, A. (2021) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.09678 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Adversarially Guided Actor-CriticPreprint
Flet-Berliac, Y., Ferret, J., Pietquin, O., Preux, P., & Geist, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.04376 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“First, a battery of recent studies (Farebrother et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018a; Song et al., 2020; Cobbe et al., 2020) indicates that current RL methods fail to generalize correctly even when agents have been trained in a diverse set of environments.”
BackgroundLook where you look! Saliency-guided Q-networks for generalization in visual Reinforcement Learning
Bertoin, D., Zouitine, A., Zouitine, M., & Rachelson, E. (2022) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.52202/068431-2225 · Cited by 69
“Farebrother et al. [2018], Cobbe et al. [2019, 2020] demonstrated the beneficial effects of popular regularization methods from the supervised learning literature.”
BackgroundInfluentialA Comprehensive Survey of Data Augmentation in Visual Reinforcement Learning
Ma, G., Wang, Z., Yuan, Z.-C., Wang, X., Yuan, B., & Tao, D.-C. (2022) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-025-02472-w · Cited by 66 · see citing works
“A naive approach to enhancing generalization is to apply regularization techniques originally developed for supervised learning [18, 19], including `2 regularization [76], entropy regularization [16, 17], dropout [20] and batch normalization [77].”
Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization
Gao, L., Schulman, J., & Hilton, J. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.10760 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
“Overfitting has been observed and studied in RL settings [Zhang et al., 2018a,b, Farebrother et al., 2018, Cobbe et al., 2019].”
BackgroundWhat Makes Pre-Trained Visual Representations Successful for Robust Manipulation?
Burns, K., Witzel, Z., Hamid, J. I., Yu, T.-H., Finn, C., & Hausman, K. (2023) · Conference on Robot Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.12444 · Cited by 58
“Unlike work that focuses on changes in dynamics or initial state distribution (Huang et al., 2021; Raileanu et al., 2020; Laskin et al., 2020a; Cobbe et al., 2019b; Packer et al., 2018; Farebrother et al., 2018), we focus exclusively on the setting of visual distribution shifts.”
BackgroundDRIBO: Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning via Multi-View Information BottleneckPreprint
Fan, J., & Li, W. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.13268 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“even when these environments contain semantically equivalent information relevant to the control task (Farebrother et al., 2018; Cobbe et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2018b;a; Yu et al., 2019).”
Chain of Thought Imitation with Procedure Cloning
Abbeel, P., Nachum, O., Schuurmans, D., & Yang, M. (2022) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.10816 · Cited by 54
“A variety of image-based regularization techniques have also been applied to deep RL including dropout and l -2 regularization [32], data augmentation and batch normalization [33], domain randomization [34], and network randomization [35].”
MethodCORA: Benchmarks, Baselines, and Metrics as a Platform for Continual Reinforcement Learning AgentsPreprint
Powers, S., Xing, E., Kolve, E., Mottaghi, R., & Gupta, A. (2021) · CoLLAs · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.10067 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
“We note that different Atari game modes may also be used to produce variation and assess generalization capability, as proposed by Farebrother et al. (2018).”
MethodCybORG: An Autonomous Cyber Operations Research GymPreprint
Baillie, C., Standen, M., Schwartz, J., Docking, M., Bowman, D., & Kim, J. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.10667 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“A model may produce solutions that work well for one specific problem and environment, but perform poorly when applied to similar problems or environments [9, 1, 24, 6].”
On the Importance of Exploration for Generalization in Reinforcement Learning
Jiang, Y., Kolter, J., & Raileanu, R. (2023) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.05483 · Cited by 49
“A natural way to alleviate overfitting is to apply widely-used regularization techniques such as implicit regularization [100], dropout [45], batch normalization [29], or data augmentation [116, 61, 60, 92, 112, 115, 40, 41, 54].”
BackgroundMethodInvestigating the Properties of Neural Network Representations in Reinforcement Learning
Wang, H., Miahi, E., White, M., Machado, M. C., Abbas, Z., Kumaraswamy, R., Liu, V., & White, A. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.15955 · Cited by 43
“Other work has highlighted that it can be difficult to obtain any transfer in reinforcement learning [16], [61].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationHyperspherical Normalization for Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning
Lee, H., Lee, Y., Seno, T., Kim, D., Stone, P., & Choo, J. (2025) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.15280 · Cited by 42
“To address these challenges, the RL community has explored regularization techniques from SL. Methods such as weight decay (Farebrother et al., 2018) and dropout (Hi-raoka et al., 2021) have been applied to reduce overfitting and improve generalization.”
Why Generalization in RL is Difficult: Epistemic POMDPs and Implicit Partial Observability
Ghosh, D., Rahme, J., Kumar, A., Zhang, A., Adams, R. P., & Levine, S. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.06277 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“References [1] Jesse Farebrother, Marlos C.”
OCAtari: Object-Centric Atari 2600 Reinforcement Learning Environments
Delfosse, Q., Blüml, J., Gregori, B., Sztwiertnia, S., & Kersting, K. (2023) · RLJ · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.08649 · Cited by 39
“…to check if a suboptimal learned behavior is due to misdetections, wrong object identifications, or a reasoning failure, as well as permit more effortless knowledge transfer between human and learning agents, or among different tasks, reducing the number of needed samples (Dubey et al., 2018).”
Regularization Matters in Policy OptimizationPreprint
Liu, Z., Li, X., Kang, B., & Darrell, T. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.09191 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“The generalization gap can come from different modes/levels/difficulties of a game (Farebrother et al., 2018), simulation vs. real world (Tobin et al., 2017), parameter variations (Pattanaik et al., 2018), or different random seeds in environment generation (Zhang et al., 2018b).”
InfluentialGroup Equivariant Deep Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Mondal, A. K., Nair, P., & Siddiqi, K. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.03437 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“One way to tackle this problem is to apply standard regularization techniques such as L2 regularization, dropout (Srivastava et al., 2014), data augmentation and batch normalization (Ioffe & Szegedy, 2015), as proposed in (Farebrother et al., 2018; Cobbe et al., 2018).”
MethodOng, K. S.-H., Wang, W., Hieu, N. Q., Niyato, D., & Friedrichs, T. (2022) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2022.3151862 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“We avoid overfitting on the small demonstration data set by incorporating the L2 regularization loss J L 2 ( Q ) = || θ || 22 , expressed as the sum of the squares of the NN weights [35].”
MethodScalable Evaluation of Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Melting Pot
Leibo, J. Z., Duéñez-Guzmán, E., Vezhnevets, A. S., Agapiou, J. P., Sunehag, P., Koster, R., Matyas, J., Beattie, C., Mordatch, I., & Graepel, T. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.06857 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“Within the SARL research community there have been sev-* eral recent calls to import the methodological stance concerning the primacy of generalization from supervised learning (Cobbe et al., 2019; Farebrother et al., 2018; Juliani et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2018a;b).”
BackgroundThe Generalization Gap in Offline Reinforcement Learning
Mediratta, I., You, Q., Jiang, M., & Raileanu, R. (2023) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.05742 · Cited by 31
“…work has emphasized the challenges of training online RL agents that can generalize to new transition and reward functions (Rajeswaran et al., 2017; Machado et al., 2018; Justesen et al., 2018; Packer et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2018a,b; Nichol et al., 2018; Cobbe et al., 2018, 2020; Juliani et…”
BackgroundMethodReturn-based Scaling: Yet Another Normalisation Trick for Deep RLPreprint
Schaul, T., Ostrovski, G., Kemaev, I., & Borsa, D. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.05347 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“Another potentially 11 important aspect is whether a scaled TD-error interacts differently with regularisation terms (such as L 2 (Farebrother et al., 2018) or entropy regularisation) than an unscaled one.”
BackgroundWhen Is Generalizable Reinforcement Learning Tractable?Preprint
Malik, D., Li, Y., & Ravikumar, P. (2021) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.00300 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“This has raised concerns about RL agents overfitting to a single environment, instead of learning meaningful skills (Farebrother et al., 2018).”
BackgroundRecurrent Model-Free RL is a Strong Baseline for Many POMDPs
Ni, T., Eysenbach, B., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.05038 · Cited by 30
“Algorithms for improving generalization in RL can be roughly divided into regularization-based methods (Farebrother et al., 2018; Cobbe et al., 2020; Igl et al., 2019), methods that use special model architectures (Srouji et al.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAdversarial robustness of deep reinforcement learning-based intrusion detection
Merzouk, M. A., Neal, C., Delas, J., Yaich, R., Cuppens-Boulahia, N., & Cuppens, F. (2024) · International Journal of Information Security · doi:10.1007/s10207-024-00903-2 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“The performance decrease with larger neural networks is caused by the overfitting tendency of value-based algorithms like DQN and QRDQN [13].”
Liu, Z.-S., & Xu, P. (2024) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.15399 · Cited by 30
“However, in practical scenarios where this assumption is violated, standard RL methods are prone to severe failures (Farebrother et al., 2018; Packer et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2020), a phenomenon known as the sim-to-real gap .”
BackgroundAvalon: A Benchmark for RL Generalization Using Procedurally Generated Worlds
Albrecht, J., Fetterman, A., Fogelman, B., Kitanidis, E., Wr'oblewski, B., Seo, N., Rosenthal, M., Knutins, M., Polizzi, Z., Simon, J. B., et al. (2022) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.13417 · Cited by 30
“…have matched or exceeded human performance on a number of narrowly-defined tasks such as Go and Atari [4, 7, 28, 34, 40], existing models typically fail to generalize to unseen tasks and environments, even when testing on environments drawn from the same distribution as training [11, 45, 46].”
BackgroundAdaptive Rational Activations to Boost Deep Reinforcement Learning
Delfosse, Q., Schramowski, P., Mundt, M., Molina, A., & Kersting, K. (2021) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.09407 · Cited by 30
“By making use of weight-sharing across rational activations in different layers, we thus include regularisation, necessary for RL (Farebrother et al., 2018; Roy et al., 2020; Yarats et al., 2021).”
BackgroundMethodLi, W., Jin, B., Wang, X., Yan, J., & Hongyuan Zha, B. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.11145 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“Some works [14, 38] have shown that model regularization techniques have a great impact on the performance of single-agent reinforcement learning models.”
BackgroundOn Catastrophic Interference in Atari 2600 GamesPreprint
Fedus, W., Ghosh, D., Martin, J. D., Bellemare, M. G., Bengio, Y., & Larochelle, H. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.12499 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“Multi-task research in the ALE often builds upon the assumption that one task is one game and multi-task learning corresponds to learning multiple games (Kirkpatrick et al., 2017; Fernando et al., 2017) or to different game modes (Farebrother et al., 2018).”
Explore to Generalize in Zero-Shot RL
Zisselman, E., Lavie, I., Soudry, D., & Tamar, A. (2023) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.03072 · Cited by 27
“…al., 2019, 2020], or augmentations [Kostrikov et al., 2020, Ye et al., 2020, Lee et al., 2019a, Raileanu et al., 2021], task interpolation [Yao et al., 2021] or various regularization technique, such as dropout [Igl et al., 2020] and batch normalization [Farebrother et al., 2018, Igl et al., 2020].”
Yang, R., Wang, J., Geng, Z., Ye, M., Ji, S., Li, B., & Wu, F. (2022) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3534678.3539391 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“Several works propose to apply regularization techniques originally developed for supervised learning, including dropout [12] and batch normalization [7, 12].”
BackgroundSafety Enhancement for Deep Reinforcement Learning in Autonomous Separation Assurance
Guo, W., Brittain, M., & Wei, P. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) · doi:10.1109/itsc48978.2021.9564466 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“However, errors and accidents may happen in safety-critical systems when there exist out-of-sample scenarios in execution time, and state and model uncertainties across training and execution [6]– [8].”
BackgroundSequoia: A Software Framework to Unify Continual Learning ResearchPreprint
Normandin, F., Golemo, F., Ostapenko, O., Rodríguez, P., Riemer, M., Hurtado, J., Khetarpal, K., Lindeborg, R., Cecchi, L., Lesort, T., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.01005 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Towards Deeper Deep Reinforcement Learning with Spectral NormalizationPreprint
Bjorck, N., Gomes, C. P., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.01151 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“There is also ample systematic work on generalization in RL [11, 18, 74] and many other relevant large-scale studies include [15, 30, 76].”
BackgroundQuantized Reinforcement Learning (QUARL)
Krishnan, S., Chitlangia, S., Lam, M., Wan, Z., Faust, A., & Reddi, V. (2019) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.01055 · Cited by 25
“It has been show in previous literature (Farebrother et al., 2018; Cobbe et al., 2018) that regularization actively helps reinforcement learning training generalize better; here we further reinforce this notion and additionally establish a relationship between quantization, generalization and exploration.”
BackgroundHuang, S.-H., Miao, Y.-H., & Hsiao, Y.-T. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3082186 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“Reference [27] proposed a comprehensive framework to solve the overfitting problem in RL. Reference [28] designed a regularization method to prevent deep Q-network overfitting.”
MethodReinforcement Learning Generalization with Surprise MinimizationPreprint
Chen, J. Z. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.12399 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“However, deep RL agents are often hampered by their struggle to generalize in new environments, even when the semantic nature of the task remain similar (Farebrother et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018; Gamrian & Goldberg, 2018).”
BackgroundEmergent Social Learning via Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning
Ndousse, K., Eck, D., Levine, S., & Jaques, N. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.00581 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“Since deep RL often generalizes poorly (Cobbe et al., 2019; Farebrother et al., 2018; Packer et al., 2018), we believe these results are a promising first step on a new path for enhancing generalization.”
MaDi: Learning to Mask Distractions for Generalization in Visual Deep Reinforcement Learning
Grooten, B., Tomilin, T., Vasan, G., Taylor, M. E., Mahmood, A., Fang, M., Pechenizkiy, M., & Mocanu, D. (2023) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.15339 · Cited by 23
Normalization Enhances Generalization in Visual Reinforcement Learning
Li, L., Lyu, J., Ma, G., Wang, Z.-L., Yang, Z.-J., Li, X., & Li, Z.-H. (2023) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.00656 · Cited by 22
“These techniques include ℓ 2 regularization [15], entropy regularization [60], and dropout [19].”
MethodOnline Policy Optimization for Robust MDP
Dong, J., Li, J., Wang, B.-X., & Zhang, J. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.13841 · Cited by 22
“The standard reinforcement learning methods, however, may fail catastrophically in another environment, even if the two environments only differ slightly in dynamics [11, 22, 7, 31, 25].”
BackgroundLim, H.-D., Kim, D. W., & Lee, D. (2022) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.05404 · Cited by 22
Liu, Z.-S., & Xu, P. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.09621 · Cited by 21
“In such cases, standard offline RL could face catastrophic failures [10, 31, 64].”
Robust Visual Domain Randomization for Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Slaoui, R. B., Clements, W. R., Foerster, J., & Toth, S. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.10537 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Agents trained on one domain often fail to generalize to other domains that differ only in small ways from the original domain (Sutton, 1996; Cobbe et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2018b; Packer et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018a; Witty et al., 2018; Farebrother et al., 2018).”
BackgroundGradient-based Planning with World Models
JyothirS, V., Jalagam, S., LeCun, Y., & Sobal, V. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.17227 · Cited by 20
“…deviation from the training trajectories would result in states which the system has not encountered, thereby rendering policy networks inefficient [10, 32] This situation becomes especially evident in sparse environments where accumulating errors may cause the system to miss a specific target,…”
BackgroundReinforcement Learning for Navigation of Mobile Robot with LiDAR
Kim, I., Nengroo, S., & Har, D. (2021) · 2021 5th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA) · doi:10.1109/iceca52323.2021.9675949 · Cited by 20
“The DQN is an RL algorithm that approximates the state-action value Q through DL [18].”
MethodBlendRL: A Framework for Merging Symbolic and Neural Policy Learning
Shindo, H., Delfosse, Q., Dhami, D. S., & Kersting, K. (2024) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.11689 · Cited by 19
Learn the Time to Learn: Replay Scheduling in Continual Learning
Klasson, M., Kjellström, H., & Zhang, C. (2022) · Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.08660 · Cited by 19
“Some approaches aim to improve generalization capabilities by generating more diverse training data [21, 83, 99], using network regularization or inductive biases [30, 41, 97], or learning dynamics models [7, 67].”
BackgroundStrategies for Using Proximal Policy Optimization in Mobile Puzzle Games
Kristensen, J. T., & Burelli, P. (2020) · International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (FDG) · doi:10.1145/3402942.3402944 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“[7] find that dropout and `2 regularisation with a DQN method improve generalisation.”
MethodNetwork Randomization: A Simple Technique for Generalization in Deep Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Lee, K., Lee, K., Shin, J., & Lee, H. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.05396 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
“Fare-brother et al. (2018) and Cobbe et al. (2019) showed that regularization methods can improve the generalization performance of RL agents using various game modes of Atari (Machado et al., 2018) and procedurally generated arcade environments called CoinRun, respectively.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHorizon Generalization in Reinforcement Learning
Myers, V., Ji, C., & Eysenbach, B. (2025) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.02709 · Cited by 18
“We start by providing intuition for our key formal definitions (planning invariance and horizon generalization), provide important preliminaries on quasimetric methods, and then prove that these properties can be realized by quasimetric methods.”
Local Feature Swapping for Generalization in Reinforcement Learning
Bertoin, D., & Rachelson, E. (2022) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.06355 · Cited by 18
“The inability to generalize might be caused by overfitting to the partially explored environment dynamics (Rajeswaran et al., 2017), or to some misleading signal that is correlated with progress but does not generalize to new levels (Machado et al., 2018; Song et al., 2019).”
BackgroundPolicy Entropy for Out-of-Distribution Classification
Sedlmeier, A., Müller, R., Illium, S., & Linnhoff-Popien, C. (2020) · International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.12069 · Cited by 18
“In the last two years, an increased research focus on generalization performance has lead to the development of new benchmark environments that allow for a separation of training- and test-environments [9,21,6].”
BackgroundSimplifying Latent Dynamics with Softly State-Invariant World Models
Saanum, T., Dayan, P., & Schulz, E. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.52202/079017-1212 · Cited by 17
“Mutual information minimization also has links to generalization ability [31, 32, 33, 34, 35], robustness in RL [36, 37], and exploration [38, 39].”
BackgroundRethinking Value Function Learning for Generalization in Reinforcement Learning
Moon, S., Lee, J., & Song, H. O. (2022) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.09960 · Cited by 17
“However, current state-of-the-art RL algorithms often fail to generalize to unseen test environments with visual variations, even if they achieve high performance in their training environments [14, 41, 9].”
BackgroundMethodLearning Dynamics and Generalization in Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Lyle, C., Rowland, M., Dabney, W., Kwiatkowska, M., & Gal, Y. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.02126 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“An array of prior empirical works demonstrate that RL algorithms which succeed at the tasks they are trained on frequently overfit on their training environment’s observations and dynamics (Lewandowski, 2020; Farebrother et al., 2018; Cobbe et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2018).”
BackgroundAutonomous network cyber offence strategy through deep reinforcement learning
Sultana, M., Taylor, A., & Li, L. (2021) · Defense + Commercial Sensing · doi:10.1117/12.2585173 · Cited by 17
Becker, N., Reti, D., Ntagiou, E., Wallum, M., & Schotten, H. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.15656 · Cited by 16
“An already provided Q-learning algorithm of NASim is used [4].”
MethodGeneralizing from a few environments in safety-critical reinforcement learningPreprint
Kenton, Z., Filos, A., Evans, O., & Gal, Y. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.01475 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Rogue-Gym: A New Challenge for Generalization in Reinforcement Learning
Kanagawa, Y., & Kaneko, T. (2019) · IEEE Conference on Games (CoG) · doi:10.1109/cig.2019.8848075 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“[8] proposed the use of ALE [9], an environment based on an Atari2600 emulator, to evaluate generalization in RL.”
Eysenbach, B., Salakhutdinov, R., & Levine, S. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.03214 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“Finally, the problem of learning RL policies that generalize has been studied by many prior papers [9, 10].”
MCA-Bench: A Multimodal Benchmark for Evaluating CAPTCHA Robustness Against VLM-based Attacks
Wu, Z.-L., Xue, Y.-L., Feng, Y.-Y., Wang, X.-L., & Song, Y.-R. (2025) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.05982 · Cited by 15
“Transfer and meta-learning improved adaptation via knowledge reuse (Brys et al. 2015; Nian et al. 2022; Deng et al. 2024; Fakoor et al. 2020), despite high pre-training costs (Elson et al. 2007”
Upper and Lower Bounds for Distributionally Robust Off-Dynamics Reinforcement Learning
Liu, Z.-S., Wang, W.-X., & Xu, P. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.20521 · Cited by 15
“This sim-to-real gap, representing the difference between training and testing environments, can lead to failures in fields like infectious disease control and robotics (Farebrother et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2020; Laber et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2023; Peng et al., 2018).”
BackgroundThe Overcooked Generalisation Challenge
Ruhdorfer, C., Bortoletto, M., Penzkofer, A., & Bulling, A. (2024) · Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.17949 · Cited by 15
“Our agents especially seem to struggle with layouts requiring more complex forms of interaction, i.e. Coordination Ring, Counter Circuit and Forced Coordination.”
Interference and Generalization in Temporal Difference Learning
Bengio, E., Pineau, J., & Precup, D. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.06350 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“This led to many works showing the brittleness of new TD methods (Machado et al., 2018; Farebrother et al., 2018; Packer et al., 2018; Witty et al., 2018), and works proposing to train on a distribution of environments (Zhang et al.”
BackgroundHackAtari: Atari Learning Environments for Robust and Continual Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Delfosse, Q., Blüml, J., Gregori, B., & Kersting, K. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.03997 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“While the first steps have been done in this direction [Farebrother et al., 2018, Tomilin et al., 2024], with HackAtari, we start adding more of the needed variety to the ALE by generating new versions of already known games.”
BackgroundConsistent Dropout for Policy Gradient Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Hausknecht, M. J., & Wagener, N. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.11818 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Local Path Planning among Pushable Objects based on Reinforcement Learning
Yao, L., Modugno, V., Delfaki, A. M., Liu, Y.-C., Stoyanov, D., & Kanoulas, D. (2023) · IEEE/RJS International Conference on Intelligent RObots and Systems · doi:10.1109/iros58592.2024.10802257 · Cited by 13
“The optimization process leverages the ADAM algorithm [28], enhanced with l2 regularization to improve stability [29], and incorporates gradient clipping to mitigate the risk of exploding gradients, a common issue in scenarios involving off-policy learning, approximate function representation, and…”
Enabling A Network AI Gym for Autonomous Cyber Agents
Li, L., Rami, J.-P. S. E., Taylor, A., Rao, J. H., & Kunz, T. (2022) · International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI) · doi:10.1109/csci58124.2022.00034 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Improve Agents without Retraining: Parallel Tree Search with Off-Policy CorrectionPreprint
Hallak, A., Dalal, G., Dalton, S., Frosio, I., Mannor, S., & Chechik, G. (2021) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.01715 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Similar poor generalization has been observed in previous studies [16] and is interpreted as an off-policy distribution shift [35].”
Correcting Momentum in Temporal Difference LearningPreprint
Bengio, E., Pineau, J., & Precup, D. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.03955 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Unfortunately, the naive application of TD to DNNs has been shown to be brittle (Machado et al., 2018; Farebrother et al., 2018; Packer et al., 2018; Witty et al., 2018), with extensions such as the n -step TD update (Fedus et al., 2020) or the TD( λ ) update (Molchanov et al., 2016) only…”
Deep Reinforcement Learning with Weighted Q-LearningPreprint
Cini, A., D'Eramo, C., Peters, J., & Alippi, C. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.09280 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Xu, J.-Y., Hu, P., & Alrifaee, B. (2024) · 2024 IEEE 27th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) · doi:10.1109/itsc58415.2024.10919918 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Generalization : The authors in [2] explore the potential of regularization techniques such as dropout to enhance both the sample efficiency and generalization of Deep Q-Learning and show that it can foster the learning of more general features.”
Measuring and Mitigating Interference in Reinforcement Learning
Liu, V., Wang, H., Tao, R.-Y., Javed, K., White, A., & White, M. (2023) · CoLLAs · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.04887 · Cited by 11
“Learning on new environments often results in drops in performance on previously learned environments (Farebrother et al., 2018; Packer et al., 2018; Rajeswaran et al., 2017; Cobbe et al., 2019).”
BackgroundOn the Power of Pre-training for Generalization in RL: Provable Benefits and Hardness
Ye, H., Chen, X.-Y., Wang, L., & Du, S. (2022) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.10464 · Cited by 11
“This learning paradigm can lead to the issue of overfitting in RL (Sutton, 1995; Farebrother et al., 2018), and may have degenerate performance when the agent is deployed to an unseen (but similar) environment.”
Background
- Authors
- Farebrother, J., Machado, M. C., & Bowling, M.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1810.00123
- OpenAlex
- W2893662673
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
- Keywords
- deep Q-network, generalization, regularization, over-specialization, Atari 2600, dropout, Tikhonov regularization, fine-tuning, sample efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review