PreprintCited by 533Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsArtificial Intelligence in GamesAdvanced Bandit Algorithms Research

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 41 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Exploration by Random Network Distillation

Open access

Abstract

We introduce an exploration bonus for deep reinforcement learning methods that is easy to implement and adds minimal overhead to the computation performed. The bonus is the error of a neural network predicting features of the observations given by a fixed randomly initialized neural network. We also introduce a method to flexibly combine intrinsic and extrinsic rewards. We find that the random network distillation (RND) bonus combined with this increased flexibility enables significant progress on several hard exploration Atari games. In particular we establish state of the art performance on Montezuma's Revenge, a game famously difficult for deep reinforcement learning methods. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first method that achieves better than average human performance on this game without using demonstrations or having access to the underlying state of the game, and occasionally completes the first level.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1810.12894

Cites

41 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Yusuf Aytar, Tobias Pfaff, David Budden, Tom Le Paine, Ziyu Wang, and Nando de Freitas. Playing hard exploration games by watching YouTube. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.11592 , 2018. · arXiv
  2. Benjamin Eysenbach, Abhishek Gupta, Julian Ibarz, and Sergey Levine. Diversity is all you need: Learning skills without a reward function. arXiv preprint , 2018.
  3. Justin Fu, John D Co-Reyes, and Sergey Levine. EX2: Exploration with exemplar models for deep reinforcement learning. NIPS , 2017.
  4. Karol Gregor, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Daan Wierstra. Variational intrinsic control. ICLR Workshop , 2017.
  5. Nick Haber, Damian Mrowca, Li Fei-Fei, and Daniel LK Yamins. Learning to play with intrinsicallymotivated self-aware agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.07442 , 2018. · arXiv
  6. Rein Houthooft, Xi Chen, Yan Duan, John Schulman, Filip De Turck, and Pieter Abbeel. VIME: Variational information maximizing exploration. In NIPS , 2016.
  7. Manuel Lopes, Tobias Lang, Marc Toussaint, and Pierre-Yves Oudeyer. Exploration in model-based reinforcement learning by empirically estimating learning progress. In NIPS , 2012.
  8. Volodymyr Mnih, Koray Kavukcuoglu, David Silver, Andrei A. Rusu, Joel Veness, Marc G. Bellemare, Alex Graves, Martin Riedmiller, Andreas K. Fidjeland, Georg Ostrovski, Stig Petersen, Charles Beattie, Amir Sadik, Ioannis Antonoglou, Helen King, Dharshan Kumaran, Daan Wierstra, Shane Legg, and Demis Hassabis. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature , 518(7540):529-533, February 2015.
  9. Volodymyr Mnih, Adria Puigdomenech Badia, Mehdi Mirza, Alex Graves, Timothy Lillicrap, Tim Harley, David Silver, and Koray Kavukcuoglu. Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning. In ICML , 2016.
  10. Junhyuk Oh, Yijie Guo, Satinder Singh, and Honglak Lee. Self-imitation learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.05635 , 2018. · arXiv
  11. OpenAI, :, M. Andrychowicz, B. Baker, M. Chociej, R. Jozefowicz, B. McGrew, J. Pachocki, A. Petron, M. Plappert, G. Powell, A. Ray, J. Schneider, S. Sidor, J. Tobin, P. Welinder, L. Weng, and W. Zaremba. Learning Dexterous In-Hand Manipulation. ArXiv e-prints , August 2018.
  12. Georg Ostrovski, Marc G Bellemare, Aaron van den Oord, and R´ emi Munos. Count-based exploration with neural density models. International Conference for Machine Learning , 2018.
  13. Zichao Yang, Marcin Moczulski, Misha Denil, Nando de Freitas, Alex Smola, Le Song, and Ziyu Wang. Deep fried convnets. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pp. 1476-1483, 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 533

Metadata

Authors
Burda, Y., Edwards, H., Storkey, A., & Klimov, O.
Affiliations
OpenAI (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2899205164
Cited by
527
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 115 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
Keywords
random network distillation, exploration bonus, deep reinforcement learning, intrinsic rewards, Atari games, Montezuma's Revenge, feature prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review