PreprintCited by 38Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsRobot Manipulation and LearningAdvanced Vision and Imaging

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reinforcement Learning of Active Vision for Manipulating Objects under Occlusions

Open access
Cheng, Ricson, Agarwal, Arpit, Fragkiadaki, Katerina·2018·arXiv

Abstract

We consider artificial agents that learn to jointly control their gripperand camera in order to reinforcement learn manipulation policies in the presenceof occlusions from distractor objects. Distractors often occlude the object of in-terest and cause it to disappear from the field of view. We propose hand/eye con-trollers that learn to move the camera to keep the object within the field of viewand visible, in coordination to manipulating it to achieve the desired goal, e.g.,pushing it to a target location. We incorporate structural biases of object-centricattention within our actor-critic architectures, which our experiments suggest tobe a key for good performance. Our results further highlight the importance ofcurriculum with regards to environment difficulty. The resulting active vision /manipulation policies outperform static camera setups for a variety of clutteredenvironments.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1811.08067

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interactive perception has been shown effective in exploring and exploiting object and environment properties, with the main focus on rigid and articulated objects.

    “IP has been shown effective in exploring and exploiting object and environment properties, with the main focus on rigid and articulated objects [2], [3], [4], [5], [6].”

    From Interactive Perception for Deformable Object Manipulation (2024) · cites this paper as [2]

  • Recent work on learning policies in the context of interactive perception focuses mostly on rigid objects and reinforcement learning.

    “Recent work on learning policies in the context of IP focuses mostly on rigid objects and RL [2], [3].”

    From Interactive Perception for Deformable Object Manipulation (2024) · cites this paper as [2]

  • The proposed structure is critical to addressing challenges faced by [2] in deformable object scenarios.

    “The proposed structure is shown to be critical to addressing challenges faced by [2] in deformable object scenarios.”

    From Interactive Perception for Deformable Object Manipulation (2024) · cites this paper as [2]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cheng, R., Agarwal, A., & Fragkiadaki, K.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
Pages
422-431
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898784685
Cited by
38
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Conference on Robot Learning
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
active vision, robotic manipulation, occlusion, actor-critic, curriculum learning, cluttered environments, pushing, reinforcement learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review