The DOI matches its DataCite record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Communication-Efficient On-Device Machine Learning: Federated Distillation and Augmentation under Non-IID Private Data
Open accessAbstract
On-device machine learning (ML) enables the training process to exploit a massive amount of user-generated private data samples. To enjoy this benefit, inter-device communication overhead should be minimized. With this end, we propose federated distillation (FD), a distributed model training algorithm whose communication payload size is much smaller than a benchmark scheme, federated learning (FL), particularly when the model size is large. Moreover, user-generated data samples are likely to become non-IID across devices, which commonly degrades the performance compared to the case with an IID dataset. To cope with this, we propose federated augmentation (FAug), where each device collectively trains a generative model, and thereby augments its local data towards yielding an IID dataset. Empirical studies demonstrate that FD with FAug yields around 26x less communication overhead while achieving 95-98% test accuracy compared to FL.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Using an online version of KD can reduce such kind of communication cost [194].In other words, the model outputs rather the updated model parameters on each device are exchanged, making the training of large-sized local models possible.”
From Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [194]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data
McMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & Arcas, B. A. Y. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.05629 · Cited by 14,215
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Conditional Generative Adversarial Nets
Mirza, M., & Osindero, S. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1411.1784 · Cited by 8,863
Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspective
Geyer, R. C., Klein, T., & Nabi, M. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1712.07557 · Cited by 1,052
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- [2][2] M. Bennis. Smartphones Will Get Even Smarter With On-Device Machine Learning. IEEE Spectrum. Mar. 2018 [Online, Accessed: 2018-11-23]. URL: https://spectrum.ieee.org/techtalk/telecom/wireless/smartphones-will-get-even-smarter-with-ondevice-machine-learning. -
- [3][3] J. Koneˇ cný, H. B. McMagan, and D. Ramage. Federated Optimization: Distributed Machine Learning for On-Device Intelligence [Online]. ArXiv preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.02527. - · arXiv
- [4][4] H. B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, S. Hampson, and B. A. y Arcas. CommunicationEfficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data. Proc. AISTATS, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, Apr. 2017. -
- [5][5] H. Kim, J. Park, M. Bennis, and S.-L. Kim. On-Device Federated Learning via Blockchain and its Latency Analysis [Online]. ArXiv preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.03949. - · arXiv
- [6][6] S. Samarakoon, M. Bennis, W. Saad, and M. Debbah. Distributed Federated Learning for Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Vehicular Communications [Online]. ArXiv preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.08127. - · arXiv
- [7][7] T. Nishio and R. Yonetani. Client Selection for Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Resources in Mobile Edge [Online]. ArXiv preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.08333. - · arXiv
- [9][9] Y. Zhao, M. Li, L. Lai, N. Suda, D. Civin, and V. Chandra. Federated Learning with Non-IID Data [Online]. arXiv preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.00582. - · arXiv
- [11][11] R. Anil, G. Pereyra, A. Passos, R. Ormandi, G. E. Dahl, and G. E. Hinton. Large Scale Distributed Neural Network Training Through Online Distillation [Online]. ArXiv preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.03235. - · arXiv
- [13][13] J. Park, S.-L. Kim, and J. Zander. Tractable Resource Management with Uplink Decoupled Millimeter-Wave Overlay in Ultra-Dense Cellular Networks. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., 15(6):4362-4379, Jun. 2016.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning
Kairouz, P., & McMahan, H. B. (2021) · Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000083 · Cited by 7,772
Self-citationFederated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions
Li, T., Sahu, A. K., Talwalkar, A., & Smith, V. (2020) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2020.2975749 · Cited by 6,210
Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networks
Li, T., Sahu, A. K., Zaheer, M., Sanjabi, M., Talwalkar, A., & Smith, V. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.06127 · Cited by 4,023
Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey
Wang, X., Han, Y., Leung, V. C. M., Niyato, D., Yan, X., & Chen, X. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2970550 · Cited by 1,498
“Using an online version of KD can reduce such kind of communication cost [194].”
MethodA survey on security and privacy of federated learning
Mothukuri, V., Parizi, R. M., Pouriyeh, S., Huang, Y., Dehghantanha, A., & Srivastava, G. (2021) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2020.10.007 · Cited by 1,480
Metadata
- Authors
- Jeong, E., Oh, S., Kim, H., Park, J., Bennis, M., & Kim, S.-L.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1811.11479
- OpenAlex
- W2903471046
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 106 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- on-device learning, federated distillation, non-IID data, communication efficiency, generative models, data augmentation, communication cost reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
