PreprintCited by 374Anomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection

Sub-Image Anomaly Detection with Deep Pyramid Correspondences

Open access
Cohen, Niv, Hoshen, Yedid·2020·arXiv

Abstract

Nearest neighbor (kNN) methods utilizing deep pre-trained features exhibit very strong anomaly detection performance when applied to entire images. A limitation of kNN methods is the lack of segmentation map describing where the anomaly lies inside the image. In this work we present a novel anomaly segmentation approach based on alignment between an anomalous image and a constant number of the similar normal images. Our method, Semantic Pyramid Anomaly Detection (SPADE) uses correspondences based on a multi-resolution feature pyramid. SPADE is shown to achieve state-of-the-art performance on unsupervised anomaly detection and localization while requiring virtually no training time.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2005.02357

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared to image-level memory approaches in [10], PatchCore matches localization and detection performance with only 5/1 nominal shots.

    “Compared to image-level memory approaches in [10], we find matching localization and detection performance with only 5 / 1 nominal shots.”

    From Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detection (2022) · cites this paper as [10]

  • SPADE requires a preselection stage of feature maps for pixel-level anomaly detection due to computational limitations.

    “Due to computational limitations, SPADE requires a preselection stage of feature maps for pixel-level anomaly detection based on a weaker image-level anomaly detection mechanism reliant on full-image, deep feature representations, i.e., global averaging of the last feature map.”

    From Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detection (2022) · cites this paper as [10]

  • PatchCore-100% without subsampling has lower inference time for joint image- and pixel-level anomaly detection than SPADE.

    “As can be seen, inference time for joint image- and pixel-level anomaly detection of PatchCore -100% (without subsampling) are lower than SPADE [10] but with higher performance.”

    From Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detection (2022) · cites this paper as [10]

  • PatchCore-100% without subsampling has higher performance than SPADE for joint image- and pixel-level anomaly detection.

    “As can be seen, inference time for joint image- and pixel-level anomaly detection of PatchCore -100% (without subsampling) are lower than SPADE [10] but with higher performance.”

    From Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detection (2022) · cites this paper as [10]

  • Aggregation of multiple feature hierarchies offers some benefit.

    “Empirically and similar to [10] and [14], we found aggregation of multiple feature hierarchies to offer some benefit.”

    From Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detection (2022) · cites this paper as [10]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohen, N., & Hoshen, Y.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3023868590
Cited by
372
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 128 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 34
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Keywords
anomaly localization, anomaly segmentation, feature matching, unsupervised anomaly detection, semantic segmentation, Spades

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review