The DOI matches its DataCite record; 43 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Explanation in Human-AI Systems: A Literature Meta-Review, Synopsis of Key Ideas and Publications, and Bibliography for Explainable AI
Open accessAbstract
This is an integrative review that address the question, "What makes for a good explanation?" with reference to AI systems. Pertinent literatures are vast. Thus, this review is necessarily selective. That said, most of the key concepts and issues are expressed in this Report. The Report encapsulates the history of computer science efforts to create systems that explain and instruct (intelligent tutoring systems and expert systems). The Report expresses the explainability issues and challenges in modern AI, and presents capsule views of the leading psychological theories of explanation. Certain articles stand out by virtue of their particular relevance to XAI, and their methods, results, and key points are highlighted. It is recommended that AI/XAI researchers be encouraged to include in their research reports fuller details on their empirical or experimental methods, in the fashion of experimental psychology research reports: details on Participants, Instructions, Procedures, Tasks, Dependent Variables (operational definitions of the measures and metrics), Independent Variables (conditions), and Control Conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Explainability is a prerequisite of AI customization, but an explanation is not only the result of algorithmic support (Adadi and Berrada 2018;Mueller et al. 2019).”
From Keeping the organization in the loop: a socio-technical extension of human-centered artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as Mueller et al. 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“researchers have discussed the importance of an AI explanation to communicate an AI output to a user [5, 20, 29] and realize human-AI collaboration [48] for a decision-making task [15, 42].”
From Understanding the Effect of Counterfactual Explanations on Trust and Reliance on AI for Human-AI Collaborative Clinical Decision Making (2023) · cites this paper as [48]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Explainability is a prerequisite of AI customization, but an explanation is not only the result of algorithmic support (Adadi and Berrada 2018;Mueller et al. 2019).”
From Keeping the organization in the loop: a socio-technical extension of human-centered artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as Mueller et al. 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization
Selvaraju, R. R., Cogswell, M., Das, A., Vedantam, R., Parikh, D., & Batra, D. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.74 · Cited by 24,513
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learning
Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Graves, A., Antonoglou, I., Wierstra, D., & Riedmiller, M. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.5602 · Cited by 9,471
Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps
Simonyan, K., Vedaldi, A., & Zisserman, A. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6034 · Cited by 5,370
Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences
Miller, T. (2019) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007 · Cited by 5,302
Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Net
Springenberg, J. T., Dosovitskiy, A., Brox, T., & Riedmiller, M. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6806 · Cited by 3,447
Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning
Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1702.08608 · Cited by 3,121
Building machines that learn and think like people
Lake, B. M., Ullman, T. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gershman, S. J. (2017) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x16001837 · Cited by 2,550
Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learning
Gilpin, L. H., Bau, D., Yuan, B. Z., Bajwa, A., Specter, M., & Kagal, L. (2018) · 2018 IEEE 5th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) · doi:10.1109/dsaa.2018.00018 · Cited by 2,507
Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering
Goyal, Y., Khot, T., Summers-Stay, D., Batra, D., & Parikh, D. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.670 · Cited by 2,287
Understanding Neural Networks Through Deep VisualizationPreprint
Yosinski, J., Clune, J., Nguyen, A. M., Fuchs, T. J., & Lipson, H. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.06579 · Cited by 1,918
Opening the Black Box of Deep Neural Networks via InformationPreprint
Shwartz-Ziv, R., & Tishby, N. (2017) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.00810 · Cited by 1,674
Multimodal Compact Bilinear Pooling for Visual Question Answering and Visual Grounding
Fukui, A., Park, D. H., Yang, D., Rohrbach, A., Darrell, T., & Rohrbach, M. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1044 · Cited by 1,582
Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functions
Koh, P. W., & Liang, P. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.04730 · Cited by 1,514
Concrete Problems in AI Safety
Amodei, D., Olah, C., Steinhardt, J., Christiano, P., Schulman, J., & Mané, D. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.06565 · Cited by 1,314
A note on the evaluation of generative models
Theis, L., Oord, A. V. D., & Bethge, M. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.01844 · Cited by 1,026
Deep Learning: A Critical Appraisal
Marcus, G. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1801.00631 · Cited by 853
Visualizing and Understanding Recurrent Networks
Karpathy, A., Johnson, J., & Fei-Fei, L. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.02078 · Cited by 845
Label-Embedding for Image Classification
Akata, Z., Perronnin, F., Harchaoui, Z., & Schmid, C. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2015.2487986 · Cited by 787
Rationalizing Neural Predictions
Lei, T., Barzilay, R., & Jaakkola, T. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1011 · Cited by 777
Visualizing and Understanding Neural Models in NLP
Li, J., Chen, X., Hovy, E. H., & Jurafsky, D. (2016) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n16-1082 · Cited by 774
Model-Agnostic Interpretability of Machine Learning
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.05386 · Cited by 699
Towards AI-Complete Question Answering: A Set of Prerequisite Toy Tasks
Weston, J., Bordes, A., Chopra, S., Rush, A. M., van Merriënboer, B., Joulin, A., & Mikolov, T. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.05698 · Cited by 670
Learning to Reason: End-to-End Module Networks for Visual Question Answering
Hu, R., Andreas, J., Rohrbach, M., Darrell, T., & Saenko, K. (2017) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.93 · Cited by 538
Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanations
Ross, A. S., Hughes, M. C., & Doshi-Velez, F. (2017) · Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2017/371 · Cited by 515
Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering
Goyal, Y., Khot, T., Agrawal, A., Summers-Stay, D., Batra, D., & Parikh, D. (2019) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-018-1116-0 · Cited by 487
Accountability of AI Under the Law: The Role of Explanation
Doshi-Velez, F., Kortz, M., Budish, R., Bavitz, C., Gershman, S. J., O'Brien, D., Scott, K., Shieber, S., Waldo, J., Weinberger, D., et al. (2017) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3064761 · Cited by 457
What Does Explainable AI Really Mean? A New Conceptualization of Perspectives
Doran, D., Schulz, S., & Besold, T. R. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.00794 · Cited by 333
A Survey on Bayesian Deep Learning
Wang, H., & Yeung, D.-Y. (2021) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3409383 · Cited by 247
On the safety of machine learning: Cyber-physical systems, decision sciences, and data products
Varshney, K. R., & Alemzadeh, H. (2017) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2016.0051 · Cited by 211
Narayanan, M., Chen, E., He, J., Kim, B., Gershman, S., & Doshi-Velez, F. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.00682 · Cited by 153
Usunier, N., Synnaeve, G., Lin, Z.-M., & Chintala, S. (2016) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.02993 · Cited by 144
Hind, M., Wei, D., Campbell, M. S., Codella, N., Dhurandhar, A., Mojsilović, A., Ramamurthy, K. N., & Varshney, K. R. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3306618.3314273 · Cited by 129
Kumar, D., Wong, A. K. C., & Taylor, G. W. (2017) · IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2017.215 · Cited by 77
Natural Language Generation enhances human decision-making with uncertain information
Gkatzia, D., Lemon, O., & Rieser, V. (2016) · Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-2043 · Cited by 59
Rawlsian Fairness for Machine Learning.Preprint
Joseph, M., Kearns, M. J., Morgenstern, J., Neel, S., & Roth, A. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 54
On the Robustness of Most Probable ExplanationsPreprint
Chan, H., & Darwiche, A. Y. (2012) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1206.6819 · Cited by 43
Interpretable & Explorable Approximations of Black Box Models
Lakkaraju, H., Kamar, E., Caruana, R., & Leskovec, J. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.01154 · Cited by 23
Interpreting Visual Question Answering Models.Preprint
Goyal, Y., Mohapatra, A., Parikh, D., & Batra, D. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 22
Explaining Classification Models Built on High-Dimensional Sparse DataPreprint
Moeyersoms, J., d'Alessandro, B., Provost, F. J., & Martens, D. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.06280 · Cited by 15
Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), the goodness criteria and the grasp-ability testPreprint
Kim, T. W. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.09598 · Cited by 12
Toward a general, scaleable framework for Bayesian teaching with applications to topic modelsPreprint
Eaves, B., & Shafto, P. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.07999 · Cited by 4
Explaining Violation Traces with Finite State Natural Language Generation Models
Pace, G. J., & Rosner, M. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10223-8_17 · Cited by 2
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [9]9. Bibliography 109 APPENDIX: Evaluations of XAI System Performance Using Human Participants 170 5 DARPA XAI Literature Review p.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barredo Arrieta, A., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., Garcia, S., Gil-Lopez, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., et al. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012 · Cited by 10,423
Ali, S., Abuhmed, T., El-Sappagh, S., Muhammad, K., Alonso-Moral, J. M., Confalonieri, R., Guidotti, R., Del Ser, J., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., & Herrera, F. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805 · Cited by 1,762
Wang, B., Rau, P.-L. P., & Yuan, T. (2023) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2022.2072768 · Cited by 1,036
Markus, A. F., Kors, J. A., & Rijnbeek, P. R. (2021) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103655 · Cited by 811
Explainable AI (XAI): A systematic meta-survey of current challenges and future opportunities
Saeed, W., & Omlin, C. (2023) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110273 · Cited by 783
Metadata
- Authors
- Mueller, S. T., Hoffman, R. R., Clancey, W., Emrey, A., & Klein, G.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1902.01876
- OpenAlex
- W2913693384
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 6
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Keywords
- explainable AI, human-AI interaction, explanation quality, intelligent tutoring systems, expert systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
