PreprintCited by 688Speech Recognition and SynthesisBiometric Identification and SecuritySpeech and Audio Processing

ASVspoof 2019: Future Horizons in Spoofed and Fake Audio Detection

Open access
Todisco, Massimiliano, Wang, Xin, Vestman, Ville, Sahidullah, Md, Delgado, Hector, Nautsch, Andreas, Yamagishi, Junichi, Evans, Nicholas +2 more·2019·arXiv

Abstract

ASVspoof, now in its third edition, is a series of community-led challenges which promote the development of countermeasures to protect automatic speaker verification (ASV) from the threat of spoofing. Advances in the 2019 edition include: (i) a consideration of both logical access (LA) and physical access (PA) scenarios and the three major forms of spoofing attack, namely synthetic, converted and replayed speech; (ii) spoofing attacks generated with state-of-the-art neural acoustic and waveform models; (iii) an improved, controlled simulation of replay attacks; (iv) use of the tandem detection cost function (t-DCF) that reflects the impact of both spoofing and countermeasures upon ASV reliability. Even if ASV remains the core focus, in retaining the equal error rate (EER) as a secondary metric, ASYspoof also embraces the growing importance of fake audio detection. ASVspoof 2019 attracted the participation of 63 research teams, with more than half of these reporting systems that improve upon the performance of two baseline spoofing countermeasures. This paper describes the 2019 database, protocols and challenge results. It also outlines major findings which demonstrate the real progress made in protecting against the threat of spoofing and fake audio.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1904.05441

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Attack Agnostic Dataset is a combination of two DeepFake datasets (FakeAVCeleb and WaveFake) and one spoofing dataset (ASVspoof 2019 LA subset).

    “It is a combination of two DeepFake datasets - FakeAVCeleb [14] and WaveFake [18], and one dataset originally prepared for spoofing detection ASVspoof 2019 LA subset [19].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Todisco, M., Wang, X., Vestman, V., Sahidullah, M., Delgado, H., Nautsch, A., Yamagishi, J., Evans, N., Kinnunen, T., & Lee, K. A.
Affiliations
  • EURECOM (FR)
  • National Institute of Informatics (JP)
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • Institute for Infocomm Research (SG)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
Pages
1008-1012
ISSN
2308-457X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2936802426
Cited by
688
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 91 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 101 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 17
FWCI
27.07
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Interspeech (USB) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Graduate School and Research Center in Digital Science (EURECOM) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Nvidia
  • Itä-Suomen Yliopisto
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (18H04112, 17H04687, 16H06302, 18H04120, 18KT0051, CREST, 16K16096)
  • China Scholarship Council
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16K16096, JPMJCR18A6, 18H04120, 18H04112, CREST, 16H06302, 17H04687, 18KT0051)
  • Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (JPMJCR18A6)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
ASVspoof 2019, anti-spoofing, speaker verification, replay attacks, synthetic speech, spoofing countermeasures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review