Cited by 32Speech Recognition and SynthesisDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningMusic and Audio Processing

What to remember: Self-adaptive continual learning for audio deepfake detection

Open access
Zhang, XiaoHui, Yi, Jiangyan, Wang, Chenglong, Zhang, Chu Yuan, Zeng, Siding, Tao, Jianhua·2024·Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

The rapid evolution of speech synthesis and voice conversion has raised substantial concerns due to the potential misuse of such technology, prompting a pressing need for effective audio deepfake detection mechanisms. Existing detection models have shown remarkable success in discriminating known deepfake audio, but struggle when encountering new attack types. To address this challenge, one of the emergent effective approaches is continual learning. In this paper, we propose a continual learning approach called Radian Weight Modification (RWM) for audio deepfake detection. The fundamental concept underlying RWM involves categorizing all classes into two groups: those with compact feature distributions across tasks, such as genuine audio, and those with more spread-out distributions, like various types of fake audio. These distinctions are quantified by means of the in-class cosine distance, which subsequently serves as the basis for RWM to introduce a trainable gradient modification direction for distinct data types. Experimental evaluations against mainstream continual learning methods reveal the superiority of RWM in terms of knowledge acquisition and mitigating forgetting in audio deepfake detection. Furthermore, RWM's applicability extends beyond audio deepfake detection, demonstrating its potential significance in diverse machine learning domains such as image recognition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/aaai.v38i17.29929

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Radian Weight Modification (RWM) is a novel architectural approach for continual learning that categorizes classes based on feature distribution similarity.

    “The authors of [71] developed the Radian Weight Modification (RWM) method, a novel architectural approach for continual learning that categorizes classes based on feature distribution similarity.”

    From Deepfake Media Forensics: Status and Future Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [71]

    The Abstract and Conclusion identify RWM as a proposed continual-learning method that groups classes by feature-distribution similarity. However, the Proposed Method describes it as an algorithm for modifying gradient directions, not as an architectural approach; that characterization is not supported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The feature distribution of real speech across different tasks is relatively compact, whereas the distribution of fake speech features is more dispersed.

    “Zhang et al. [161] observed that the feature distribution of real speech across different tasks is relatively compact, whereas the distribution of fake speech features is more dispersed.”
  • RWM significantly outperforms mainstream continual learning methods in terms of knowledge memorisation.

    “Experimental results demonstrated that RWM significantly outperforms mainstream continual learning methods in terms of knowledge memorisation.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [18]18. Bischof, H.; Brox, T.; and Frahm, J., eds., Computer Vision -ECCV 2020 -16th Eu- ropean Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23-28, 2020, Pro- ceedings, Part II, volume 12347 of Lecture Notes in Com- puter Science, 524-540. Springer.
  2. [32]32. Zeng, G.; Chen, Y.; Cui, B.; and Yu, S. 2019. Contin- ual learning of context-dependent processing in neural net- works. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(8): 364-372.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, X., Yi, J., Wang, C., Zhang, C. Y., Zeng, S., & Tao, J.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2024-03-24
Volume
38
Issue
17
Pages
19569-19577
ISSN
  • 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-3468
OpenAlex
W4393160839
Cited by
32
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 9
FWCI
9.24
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (U21B2010, 61971419, 62306316, 61831022, 62322120, 62206278, 62101553, 62006223)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
Keywords
audio deepfake detection, continual learning, self-adaptive learning, knowledge forgetting, speech synthesis, voice conversion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review