Cited by 78Digital Media Forensic DetectionEmotion and Mood RecognitionSpeech Recognition and Synthesis

Do Deepfakes Feel Emotions? A Semantic Approach to Detecting Deepfakes Via Emotional Inconsistencies

Open access
Hosler, Brian, Salvi, Davide, Murray, Anthony, Antonacci, Fabio, Bestagini, Paolo, Tubaro, Stefano, Stamm, Matthew C.·2021·2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)

Abstract

Recent advances in deep learning and computer vision have spawned a new class of media forgeries known as deepfakes, which typically consist of artificially generated human faces or voices. The creation and distribution of deepfakes raise many legal and ethical concerns. As a result, the ability to distinguish between deepfakes and authentic media is vital. While deepfakes can create plausible video and audio, it may be challenging for them to to generate content that is consistent in terms of high-level semantic features, such as emotions. Unnatural displays of emotion, measured by features such as valence and arousal, can provide significant evidence that a video has been synthesized. In this paper, we propose a novel method for detecting deepfakes of a human speaker using the emotion predicted from the speaker’s face and voice. The proposed technique leverages Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks that predict emotion from audio and video Low-Level Descriptors (LLDs). Predicted emotion in time is used to classify videos as authentic or deepfakes through an additional supervised classifier.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvprw53098.2021.00112

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [34]34. A. Lieto, D. Moro, F. Devoti, C. Parera, V. Lipari, P. Bestagini, and S. Tubaro. "Hello? Who Am I Talking to?" A Shallow CNN Approach for Human vs. Bot Speech Clas- sification. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2019. 1, 3
  2. [45]45. F. Ringeval, B. Schuller, M. Valstar, N. Cummins, R. Cowie, and M. Pantic. AVEC'19: Audio/visual emotion challenge and workshop. In ACM International Conference on Multi- media, 2019. 2, 3, 4
  3. [55]55. J. Thies, M. Zollhöfer, and M. Nießner. Deferred neural ren- dering: Image synthesis using neural textures. ACM Trans- actions on Graphics (TOG), 38:1-12, 2019. 2

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hosler, B., Salvi, D., Murray, A., Antonacci, F., Bestagini, P., Tubaro, S., & Stamm, M. C.
Affiliations
  • Drexel University (US)
  • Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Venue
2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-06
Pages
1013-1022
OpenAlex
W3176193246
Cited by
78
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3
FWCI
4.42
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) (publishedVersion)
  • Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Arm
  • Air Force Research Laboratory
  • National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Keywords
deepfake detection, emotion prediction, valence and arousal, low-level descriptors, LSTM networks, video authenticity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review