The DOI matches its DataCite record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A joint model of unpaired data from scRNA-seq and spatial transcriptomics for imputing missing gene expression measurements
Open accessAbstract
Spatial studies of transcriptome provide biologists with gene expression maps of heterogeneous and complex tissues. However, most experimental protocols for spatial transcriptomics suffer from the need to select beforehand a small fraction of genes to be quantified over the entire transcriptome. Standard single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is more prevalent, easier to implement and can in principle capture any gene but cannot recover the spatial location of the cells. In this manuscript, we focus on the problem of imputation of missing genes in spatial transcriptomic data based on (unpaired) standard scRNA-seq data from the same biological tissue. Building upon domain adaptation work, we propose gimVI, a deep generative model for the integration of spatial transcriptomic data and scRNA-seq data that can be used to impute missing genes. After describing our generative model and an inference procedure for it, we compare gimVI to alternative methods from computational biology or domain adaptation on real datasets and outperform Seurat Anchors, Liger and CORAL to impute held-out genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It was shown to outperform other imputation methods such as gimVI225 and SpaGE226 with respect to various accuracy metrics and scalability215.”
From Best practices for single-cell analysis across modalities (2023) · cites this paper as [225]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks
Zhu, J.-Y., Park, T., Isola, P., & Efros, A. A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.244 · Cited by 23,602
Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes
Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6114 · Cited by 20,067
Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data
Satija, R., Farrell, J. A., Gennert, D., Schier, A. F., & Regev, A. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3192 · Cited by 7,055
Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells
Klein, A. M., Mazutis, L., Akartuna, I., Tallapragada, N., Veres, A., Li, V., Peshkin, L., Weitz, D. A., & Kirschner, M. W. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.044 · Cited by 3,356
Cell types in the mouse cortex and hippocampus revealed by single-cell RNA-seq
Zeisel, A., Muñoz-Manchado, A. B., Codeluppi, S., Lönnerberg, P., La Manno, G., Juréus, A., Marques, S., Munguba, H., He, L., Betsholtz, C., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa1934 · Cited by 3,124
Molecular Architecture of the Mouse Nervous System
Zeisel, A., Hochgerner, H., Lönnerberg, P., Johnsson, A., Memic, F., van der Zwan, J., Häring, M., Braun, E., Borm, L. E., La Manno, G., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.021 · Cited by 2,552
Deep generative modeling for single-cell transcriptomics
Lopez, R., Regier, J., Cole, M. B., Jordan, M. I., & Yosef, N. (2018) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0229-2 · Cited by 2,530
Self-citationSlide-seq: A scalable technology for measuring genome-wide expression at high spatial resolution
Rodriques, S. G., Stickels, R. R., Goeva, A., Martin, C. A., Murray, E., Vanderburg, C. R., Welch, J., Chen, L. M., Chen, F., & Macosko, E. Z. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw1219 · Cited by 2,424
Batch effects in single-cell RNA-sequencing data are corrected by matching mutual nearest neighbors
Haghverdi, L., Lun, A. T. L., Morgan, M. D., & Marioni, J. C. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4091 · Cited by 2,416
Unpaired Image-to-Image Translation using Cycle-Consistent Adversarial NetworksPreprint
Zhu, J.-Y., Park, T., Isola, P., et al. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.10593 · Cited by 2,278
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Amodio, M. and Krishnaswamy, S. MAGAN: Aligning Biological Manifolds. In International Conference on Machine Learning , 2018.
- Saunders, A., Macosko, E., Wysoker, A., Goldman, M., Krienen, F., de Rivera, H., Bien, E., Baum, M., Wang, S., Goeva, A., Nemesh, J., Kamitaki, N., Brumbaugh, S., Kulp, D., and McCarroll, S. A. A single-cell atlas of cell types, states, and other transcriptional patterns from nine regions of the adult mouse brain. bioRxiv , 2018.
- Stuart, T., Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Hafemeister, C., Papalexi, E., Mauck, W. M., Stoeckius, M., Smibert, P., and Satija, R. Comprehensive integration of single cell data. bioRxiv , 2018.
- Svensson, V. Droplet scrna-seq is not zero-inflated. bioRxiv , 2019.
- Welch, J., Kozareva, V., Ferreira, A., Vanderburg, C., Martin, C., and Macosko, E. Integrative inference of brain cell similarities and differences from single-cell genomics. bioRxiv , 2018.
- Xu, C., Lopez, R., Mehlman, E., Regier, J., Jordan, M. I., and Yosef, N. Harmonization and Annotation of Singlecell Transcriptomics data with Deep Generative Models. bioRxiv , 2019.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Museum of spatial transcriptomics
Moses, L., & Pachter, L. (2022) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01409-2 · Cited by 1,255
Best practices for single-cell analysis across modalities
Heumos, L., Schaar, A. C., Lance, C., Litinetskaya, A., Drost, F., Zappia, L., Lücken, M. D., Strobl, D. C., Henao, J., Curion, F., et al. (2023) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-023-00586-w · Cited by 1,051
A Python library for probabilistic analysis of single-cell omics data
Gayoso, A., Lopez, R., Xing, G., Boyeau, P., Valiollah Pour Amiri, V., Hong, J., Wu, K., Jayasuriya, M., Mehlman, E., Langevin, M., et al. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-01206-w · Cited by 789
Self-citationXu, C., Lopez, R., Mehlman, E., Regier, J., Jordan, M. I., & Yosef, N. (2021) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20209620 · Cited by 691
“…Stuart et al , 2019), further work can utilize probabilistic graphical models that quantify measurement uncertainties in each assay, as well as the uncertainties of transferring information between modalities (e.g., predicting unmeasured gene expression in smFISH data as in (Lopez et al , 2019)).”
Self-citationSpatially resolved transcriptomes—next generation tools for tissue exploration
Asp, M., Bergenstråhle, J., & Lundeberg, J. (2020) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201900221 · Cited by 666
Metadata
- Authors
- Lopez, R., Nazaret, A., Langevin, M., Samaran, J., Regier, J., Jordan, M. I., & Yosef, N.
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1905.02269
- OpenAlex
- W2944323400
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- spatial transcriptomics, single-cell RNA sequencing, domain adaptation, deep generative models, multi-omics integration, gene expression mapping
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
