The DOI matches its DataCite record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unified Language Model Pre-training for Natural Language Understanding and Generation
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a new Unified pre-trained Language Model (UniLM) that can be fine-tuned for both natural language understanding and generation tasks. The model is pre-trained using three types of language modeling tasks: unidirectional, bidirectional, and sequence-to-sequence prediction. The unified modeling is achieved by employing a shared Transformer network and utilizing specific self-attention masks to control what context the prediction conditions on. UniLM compares favorably with BERT on the GLUE benchmark, and the SQuAD 2.0 and CoQA question answering tasks. Moreover, UniLM achieves new state-of-the-art results on five natural language generation datasets, including improving the CNN/DailyMail abstractive summarization ROUGE-L to 40.51 (2.04 absolute improvement), the Gigaword abstractive summarization ROUGE-L to 35.75 (0.86 absolute improvement), the CoQA generative question answering F1 score to 82.5 (37.1 absolute improvement), the SQuAD question generation BLEU-4 to 22.12 (3.75 absolute improvement), and the DSTC7 document-grounded dialog response generation NIST-4 to 2.67 (human performance is 2.65). The code and pre-trained models are available at https://github.com/microsoft/unilm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“A difference is that UniLM predictions are conditionally independent, whereas BART's are autoregressive.”
From BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehension (2020) · cites this paper as Dong et al., 2019
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This integration leverages the linguistic capabilities of Llama 3, utilizing both its textual output and intermediate embeddings at the token rate (Devlin et al., 2018; Dong et al., 2019; Raffel et al., 2020; Guo et al., 2023) to enhance the prediction of prosody features, thus reducing the lookahead required by the model.”
From The Llama 3 Herd of Models (2024) · cites this paper as Dong et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This approach has recently been used to obtain state-of-the-art results in many of the most common NLP benchmarks (Devlin et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2019; Dong et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2019c; Lan et al., 2019).”
From Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer (2019) · cites this paper as Dong et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision
Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., & Wojna, Z. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.308 · Cited by 32,138
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
(2004) · Cited by 9,718
Recursive Deep Models for Semantic Compositionality Over a Sentiment Treebank
Socher, R., Perelygin, A., Wu, J., Chuang, J., Manning, C. D., Ng, A., & Potts, C. (2013) · Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d13-1170 · Cited by 6,878
SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translation
Wu, Y., Schuster, M., Chen, Z., Le, Q. V., Norouzi, M., Macherey, W., Krikun, M., Cao, Y., Gao, Q., Macherey, K., et al. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.08144 · Cited by 5,319
Self-citationGLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Universal Language Model Fine-tuning for Text Classification
Howard, J., & Ruder, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1031 · Cited by 4,100
Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networks
See, A., Liu, P. J., & Manning, C. D. (2017) · Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-1099 · Cited by 3,775
Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)
Hendrycks, D., & Gimpel, K. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.08415 · Cited by 3,537
A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inference
Williams, A., Nangia, N., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1101 · Cited by 3,342
A Neural Attention Model for Abstractive Sentence Summarization
Rush, A. M., Chopra, S., & Weston, J. (2015) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1044 · Cited by 2,932
“Cloze Procedure”: A New Tool for Measuring Readability
Taylor, W. L. (1953) · Journalism Quarterly · doi:10.1177/107769905303000401 · Cited by 2,332
Zhu, Y., Kiros, R., Zemel, R., Salakhutdinov, R., Urtasun, R., Torralba, A., & Fidler, S. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.11 · Cited by 2,264
Know What You Don’t Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuAD
Rajpurkar, P., Jia, R., & Liang, P. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-2124 · Cited by 2,240
OpenNMT: Open-Source Toolkit for Neural Machine Translation
Klein, G., Kim, Y., Deng, Y., Sénellart, J., & Rush, A. M. (2017) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations (ACL Demo) · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-4012 · Cited by 1,916
The PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge
Dagan, I., Glickman, O., & Magnini, B. (2006) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11736790_9 · Cited by 1,674
(2018) · International Conference on Learning Representations · Cited by 1,621
SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity Multilingual and Crosslingual Focused Evaluation
Cer, D., Diab, M., Agirre, E., Lopez-Gazpio, I., & Specia, L. (2017) · Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2017) · doi:10.18653/v1/s17-2001 · Cited by 1,562
Multi-Task Deep Neural Networks for Natural Language Understanding
Liu, X., He, P., Chen, W., & Gao, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1441 · Cited by 1,353
Self-citationNeural Network Acceptability Judgments
Warstadt, A., Singh, A., & Bowman, S. R. (2019) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00290 · Cited by 1,215
A Deep Reinforced Model for Abstractive Summarization
Paulus, R., Xiong, C., & Socher, R. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.04304 · Cited by 1,182
Automatically Constructing a Corpus of Sentential Paraphrases.
Dolan, W. B., & Brockett, C. (2005) · Cited by 1,101
Semi-supervised Sequence Learning
Dai, A. M., & Le, Q. V. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.01432 · Cited by 994
CoQA: A Conversational Question Answering Challenge
Reddy, S., Chen, D., & Manning, C. D. (2019) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00266 · Cited by 975
MASS: Masked Sequence to Sequence Pre-training for Language GenerationPreprint
Song, K., Tan, X., Qin, T., Lu, J., & Liu, T. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.02450 · Cited by 902
Levesque, H. J., Davis, E., & Morgenstern, L. (2011) · Cited by 879
The Third PASCAL Recognizing Textual Entailment Challenge
Giampiccolo, D., Magnini, B., Dagan, I., & Dolan, B. (2007) · ACL-PASCAL@ACL · doi:10.3115/1654536.1654538 · Cited by 801
Bridging Nonlinearities and Stochastic Regularizers with Gaussian Error Linear UnitsPreprint
Hendrycks, D., & Gimpel, K. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 753
Learning to Ask: Neural Question Generation for Reading Comprehension
Du, X., Shao, J., & Cardie, C. (2017) · Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-1123 · Cited by 696
Bottom-Up Abstractive Summarization
Gehrmann, S., Deng, Y., & Rush, A. M. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1443 · Cited by 692
The Seventh PASCAL Recognizing Textual Entailment Challenge.
Bentivogli, L., Clark, P. E., Dagan, I., & Giampiccolo, D. (2008) · Cited by 533
Fine-tune BERT for Extractive SummarizationPreprint
Liu, Y. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.4230/oasics.slate.2024.2 · Cited by 519
Neural Approaches to Conversational AI
Gao, J., Galley, M., & Li, L. (2019) · Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1561/1500000074 · Cited by 424
Self-citationNeural Document Summarization by Jointly Learning to Score and Select Sentences
Zhou, Q. S., Yang, N., Wei, F., Huang, S., Zhou, M., & Zhao, T. (2018) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1061 · Cited by 383
Self-citationNeural Question Generation from Text: A Preliminary Study
Zhou, Q. S., Yang, N., Wei, F., Tan, C., Bao, H., & Zhou, M. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73618-1_56 · Cited by 371
Self-citationSemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluation
Cer, D. M., Diab, M., Agirre, E., et al. (2017) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1708.00055 · Cited by 306
Paragraph-level Neural Question Generation with Maxout Pointer and Gated Self-attention Networks
Zhao, Y., Ni, X., Ding, Y., & Ke, Q. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1424 · Cited by 282
BERT has a Mouth, and It Must Speak: BERT as a Markov Random Field Language ModelPreprint
Wang, A., & Cho, K. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.04094 · Cited by 234
Multi-Task Deep Neural Networks for Natural Language UnderstandingPreprint
Liu, X., He, P., Chen, W., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.11504 · Cited by 218
Self-citationCloze-driven Pretraining of Self-attention Networks
Baevski, A., Edunov, S., Liu, Y., Zettlemoyer, L., & Auli, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1539 · Cited by 215
Cloze-driven Pretraining of Self-attention Networks
Baevski, A., Edunov, S., Liu, Y., Zettlemoyer, L., & Auli, M. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.07785 · Cited by 215
Learning and Evaluating General Linguistic IntelligencePreprint
Yogatama, D., d’Autume, C. D. M., Connor, J. T., Kočiský, T., Chrzanowski, M., Kong, L., Lazaridou, A., Wang, L., Yu, L., Dyer, C., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.11373 · Cited by 212
Retrieve, Rerank and Rewrite: Soft Template Based Neural Summarization
Cao, Z., Li, W., Li, S., & Wei, F. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1015 · Cited by 202
Self-citationHarvesting Paragraph-level Question-Answer Pairs from Wikipedia
Du, X., & Cardie, C. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1177 · Cited by 168
Read + Verify: Machine Reading Comprehension with Unanswerable Questions
Hu, M., Wei, F., Peng, Y., Huang, Z., Yang, N., & Li, D. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33016529 · Cited by 147
Self-citationCross-Lingual Natural Language Generation via Pre-Training
Chi, Z., Li, D., Wei, F., Wang, W., Mao, X.-L., & Huang, H. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6256 · Cited by 133
Self-citationNeural Approaches to Conversational AI
Gao, J., Galley, M., & Li, L. (2019) · now publishers, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1561/9781680835533 · Cited by 125
Self-citationConversing by Reading: Contentful Neural Conversation with On-demand Machine Reading
Qin, L., Galley, M., Brockett, C., Liu, X., Gao, X., Dolan, B., Choi, Y., & Gao, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1539 · Cited by 100
Self-citationPre-trained Language Model Representations for Language GenerationPreprint
Edunov, S., Baevski, A., & Auli, M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.09722 · Cited by 41
Cluster-based beam search for pointer-generator chatbot grounded by knowledge
Tam, Y.-C. (2020) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2020.101094 · Cited by 38
Read + Verify: Machine Reading Comprehension with Unanswerable QuestionsPreprint
Hu, M., Wei, F., Peng, Y., et al. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.05759 · Cited by 20
Self-citationAddressing Semantic Drift in Question Generation for Semi-Supervised Question AnsweringPreprint
Zhang, S., & Bansal, M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.06356 · Cited by 19
Cross-Lingual Natural Language Generation via Pre-TrainingPreprint
Chi, Z., Li, D., Wei, F., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.10481 · Cited by 11
Self-citationNeural Network Acceptability Judgments
Warstadt, A., Singh, A., & Bowman, S. R. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.12471
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [2][2] Roy Bar-Haim, Ido Dagan, Bill Dolan, Lisa Ferro, and Danilo Giampiccolo. The second PASCAL recognising textual entailment challenge. In Proceedings of the Second PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment , 01 2006. -
- [14][14] Michel Galley, Chris Brockett, Xiang Gao, Jianfeng Gao, and Bill Dolan. Grounded response generation task at dstc7. In AAAI Dialog System Technology Challenges Workshop , 2019. -
- [22][22] Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations , San Diego, CA, 2015. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer
Raffel, C., Shazeer, N., Roberts, A., Lee, K., Narang, S., Matena, M., Zhou, Y., Li, W., & Liu, P. J. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.10683 · Cited by 10,929
Lewis, M., Liu, Y., Goyal, N., Ghazvininejad, M., Mohamed, A., Levy, O., Stoyanov, V., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.703 · Cited by 8,821
Han (2023) · doi:10.1109/tpami.2022.3152247 · Cited by 4,682
Self-citationLiu, P., Yuan, W., Fu, J., Jiang, Z., Hayashi, H., & Neubig, G. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3560815 · Cited by 4,361
Metadata
- Authors
- Dong, L., Yang, N., Wang, W., Wei, F., Liu, X., Wang, Y., Gao, J., Zhou, M., & Hon, H.-W.
- Affiliations
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1905.03197
- OpenAlex
- W2945260553
- Cited by
- 1,225
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 146 · 2023: 253 · 2022: 206 · 2021: 289 · 2020: 240 · 2019: 28
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- TIB Data Manager
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- pre-training, natural language understanding, natural language generation, sequence-to-sequence prediction, abstractive summarization, question answering, question generation, GLUE benchmark, SQuAD
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
