PreprintCited by 101Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesQuantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Simple holographic models of black hole evaporation

Open access

Abstract

Several recent papers have shown a close relationship between entanglement wedge reconstruction and the unitarity of black hole evaporation in AdS/CFT. The analysis of these papers however has a rather puzzling feature: all calculations are done using bulk dynamics which are essentially those Hawking used to predict information loss, but applying ideas from entanglement wedge reconstruction seems to suggest a Page curve which is consistent with information conservation. Why should two different calculations in the same model give different answers for the Page curve? In this note we present a new pair of models which clarify this situation. Our first model gives a holographic illustration of unitary black hole evaporation, in which the analogue of the Hawking radiation purifies itself as expected, and this purification is reproduced by the entanglement wedge analysis. Moreover a smooth black hole interior persists until the last stages the evaporation process. Our second model gives an alternative holographic interpretation of the situation where the bulk evolution leads to information loss: unlike in the models proposed so far, this bulk information loss is correctly reproduced by the entanglement wedge analysis. This serves as an illustration that quantum extremal surfaces are in some sense kinematic: the time-dependence of the entropy they compute depends on the choice of bulk dynamics. In both models no bulk quantum corrections need to be considered: classical extremal surfaces are enough to do the job. We argue that our first model is the one which gives the right analogy for what actually happens to evaporating black holes, but we also emphasize that any complete resolution of the information problem will require an understanding of non-perturbative bulk dynamics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1910.00972

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The QRT prescription can be motivated via a replica trick involving Euclidean wormholes.

    “The QRT prescription can be motivated via a replica trick involving Euclidean wormholes, as explored in [16-20].”

    From Page curve for an evaporating black hole (2020) · cites this paper as [18]

    The paper’s discussion of its first model (section labeled JHEP08(2020)032; page not provided) says it uses a replica trick to compute boundary entropy using the HRT formula. Section 2 describes multiboundary wormholes prepared through a Euclidean CFT path integral. It does not say that Euclidean wormholes in the replica trick motivate the QRT prescription; that specific connection is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. S.W. Hawking, Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse, Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 2460 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  2. D. Harlow, Jerusalem lectures on black holes and quantum information, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 (2016) 015002 [arXiv:1409.1231] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  3. D. Marolf, The black hole information problem: past, present, and future, Rept. Prog. Phys. 80 (2017) 092001 [arXiv:1703.02143] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  4. A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole, JHEP 12 (2019) 063 [arXiv:1905.08762] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  5. G. Penington, Entanglement wedge reconstruction and the information paradox, arXiv:1905.08255 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  6. A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena and Y. Zhao, The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry, JHEP 03 (2020) 149 [arXiv:1908.10996] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  7. J.V. Rocha, Evaporation of large black holes in AdS: coupling to the evaporon, JHEP 08 (2008) 075 [arXiv:0804.0055] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  8. N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall, Quantum extremal surfaces: holographic entanglement entropy beyond the classical regime, JHEP 01 (2015) 073 [arXiv:1408.3203] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  9. B. Czech, J.L. Karczmarek, F. Nogueira and M. Van Raamsdonk, The gravity dual of a density matrix, Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 155009 [arXiv:1204.1330] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  10. A.C. Wall, Maximin surfaces, and the strong subadditivity of the covariant holographic entanglement entropy, Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 225007 [arXiv:1211.3494] [INSPIRE]. JHEP08(2020)032 · DOI · Paper page
  11. M. Headrick, V.E. Hubeny, A. Lawrence and M. Rangamani, Causality & holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 12 (2014) 162 [arXiv:1408.6300] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  12. D.L. Jafferis, A. Lewkowycz, J. Maldacena and S.J. Suh, Relative entropy equals bulk relative entropy, JHEP 06 (2016) 004 [arXiv:1512.06431] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  13. X. Dong, D. Harlow and A.C. Wall, Reconstruction of bulk operators within the entanglement wedge in gauge-gravity duality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 021601 [arXiv:1601.05416] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  14. D. Harlow, The Ryu-Takayanagi formula from quantum error correction, Commun. Math. Phys. 354 (2017) 865 [arXiv:1607.03901] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  15. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  16. V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP 07 (2007) 062 [arXiv:0705.0016] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  17. T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 11 (2013) 074 [arXiv:1307.2892] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  18. P. Hayden and G. Penington, Learning the alpha-bits of black holes, JHEP 12 (2019) 007 [arXiv:1807.06041] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  19. C. Akers, S. Leichenauer and A. Levine, Large breakdowns of entanglement wedge reconstruction, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 126006 [arXiv:1908.03975] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  20. K. Krasnov, Holography and Riemann surfaces, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 4 (2000) 929 [hep-th/0005106] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  21. K. Skenderis and B.C. van Rees, Holography and wormholes in 2 + 1 dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys. 301 (2011) 583 [arXiv:0912.2090] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  22. V. Balasubramanian, P. Hayden, A. Maloney, D. Marolf and S.F. Ross, Multiboundary wormholes and holographic entanglement, Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 185015 [arXiv:1406.2663] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  23. D. Harlow and H. Ooguri, Symmetries in quantum field theory and quantum gravity, arXiv:1810.05338 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  24. P. Hayden and J. Preskill, Black holes as mirrors: quantum information in random subsystems, JHEP 09 (2007) 120 [arXiv:0708.4025] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  25. A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Generalized gravitational entropy, JHEP 08 (2013) 090 [arXiv:1304.4926] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  26. M. Van Raamsdonk, Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement, Gen. Rel. Grav. 42 (2010) 2323 [arXiv:1005.3035] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  27. M. Van Raamsdonk, Evaporating firewalls, JHEP 11 (2014) 038 [arXiv:1307.1796] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  28. J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, Cool horizons for entangled black holes, Fortsch. Phys. 61 (2013) 781 [arXiv:1306.0533] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  29. S.D. Mathur, The information paradox: a pedagogical introduction, Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 224001 [arXiv:0909.1038] [INSPIRE]. JHEP08(2020)032 · DOI · Paper page
  30. A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, Black holes: complementarity or firewalls?, JHEP 02 (2013) 062 [arXiv:1207.3123] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  31. A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, D. Stanford and J. Sully, An apologia for firewalls, JHEP 09 (2013) 018 [arXiv:1304.6483] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  32. D. Marolf and J. Polchinski, Gauge/gravity duality and the black hole interior, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 171301 [arXiv:1307.4706] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  33. A. Almheiri, X. Dong and D. Harlow, Bulk locality and quantum error correction in AdS/CFT, JHEP 04 (2015) 163 [arXiv:1411.7041] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  34. W.G. Unruh and R.M. Wald, Information loss, Rept. Prog. Phys. 80 (2017) 092002 [arXiv:1703.02140] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Akers, C., Engelhardt, N., & Harlow, D.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Harlow, Daniel
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
Volume
2020
Issue
8
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3048056130
Cited by
101
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 1
FWCI
9.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0019127, DESC0018944)
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • Simons Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
Keywords
black hole evaporation, black hole information paradox, entanglement wedge reconstruction, Page curve, quantum extremal surfaces, AdS/CFT correspondence, holographic models, unitarity, information loss, Hawking radiation, black hole interior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review