PreprintCited by 64Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsAdvanced Bandit Algorithms ResearchMachine Learning and Algorithms

Teacher algorithms for curriculum learning of Deep RL in continuously parameterized environments

Open access
Portelas, Rémy, Colas, Cédric, Hofmann, Katja, Oudeyer, Pierre-Yves·2019·arXiv

Abstract

We consider the problem of how a teacher algorithm can enable an unknown Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) student to become good at a skill over a wide range of diverse environments. To do so, we study how a teacher algorithm can learn to generate a learning curriculum, whereby it sequentially samples parameters controlling a stochastic procedural generation of environments. Because it does not initially know the capacities of its student, a key challenge for the teacher is to discover which environments are easy, difficult or unlearnable, and in what order to propose them to maximize the efficiency of learning over the learnable ones. To achieve this, this problem is transformed into a surrogate continuous bandit problem where the teacher samples environments in order to maximize absolute learning progress of its student. We present a new algorithm modeling absolute learning progress with Gaussian mixture models (ALP-GMM). We also adapt existing algorithms and provide a complete study in the context of DRL. Using parameterized variants of the BipedalWalker environment, we study their efficiency to personalize a learning curriculum for different learners (embodiments), their robustness to the ratio of learnable/unlearnable environments, and their scalability to non-linear and high-dimensional parameter spaces. Videos and code are available at https://github.com/flowersteam/teachDeepRL.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1910.07224

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [16][16] A. Graves, M. G. Bellemare, J. Menick, R. Munos, and K. Kavukcuoglu. Automated curriculum learning for neural networks. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 70 , pages 1311-1320. JMLR. org, 2017. -
  2. [24][24] P. Auer, N. Cesa-Bianchi, Y. Freund, and R. E. Schapire. The nonstochastic multiarmed bandit problem. SIAM journal on computing , 32(1):48-77, 2002. -
  3. [30][30] A. Laversanne-Finot, A. Pere, and P.-Y. Oudeyer. Curiosity driven exploration of learned disentangled goal spaces. In Proceedings of The 2nd Conference on Robot Learning , volume 87 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 487-504. PMLR, 29-31 Oct 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Portelas, R., Colas, C., Hofmann, K., & Oudeyer, P.-Y.
Affiliations
Microsoft Research (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981234930
Cited by
59
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 9
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
Keywords
teacher-student learning, curriculum learning, deep reinforcement learning, procedural environment generation, Gaussian mixture model, personalized learning, high-dimensional parameter spaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review