PreprintCited by 59Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum many-body systemsQuantum Mechanics and Applications

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Domain-agnostic, Noise-resistant, Hardware-efficient Evolutionary Variational Quantum Eigensolver

Open access

Abstract

Variational quantum algorithms have shown promise in numerous fields due to their versatility in solving problems of scientific and commercial interest. However, leading algorithms for Hamiltonian simulation, such as the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE), use fixed preconstructed ansatzes, limiting their general applicability and accuracy. Thus, variational forms---the quantum circuits that implement ansatzes ---are either crafted heuristically or by encoding domain-specific knowledge. In this paper, we present an Evolutionary Variational Quantum Eigensolver (EVQE), a novel variational algorithm that uses evolutionary programming techniques to minimize the expectation value of a given Hamiltonian by dynamically generating and optimizing an ansatz. The algorithm is equally applicable to optimization problems in all domains, obtaining accurate energy evaluations with hardware-efficient ansatzes. In molecular simulations, the variational forms generated by EVQE are up to $18.6\times$ shallower and use up to $12\times$ fewer CX gates than those obtained by VQE with a unitary coupled cluster ansatz. EVQE demonstrates significant noise-resistance properties, obtaining results in noisy simulation with at least $3.6\times$ less error than VQE using any tested ansatz configuration. We successfully evaluated EVQE on a real 5-qubit IBMQ quantum computer. The experimental results, which we obtained both via simulation and on real quantum hardware, demonstrate the effectiveness of EVQE for general-purpose optimization on the quantum computers of the present and near future.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1910.09694

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The coherent-error calibration effect was first conjectured theoretically and later seen experimentally in superconducting qubits, where errors after the variational procedure were reduced in some cases by over an order of magnitude.

    “This effect was first conjectured theoretically [220] and later seen experimentally in superconducting qubits [48], where errors after the variational procedure were reduced in some cases by over an order of magnitude.”

    From Variational quantum algorithms (2021) · cites this paper as [48]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rattew, A. G., Hu, S., Pistoia, M., Chen, R., & Wood, S.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2987880828
Cited by
59
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
variational quantum eigensolver, evolutionary programming, hardware-efficient ansatz, noise robustness, quantum circuit optimization, Hamiltonian simulation, quantum optimization, molecular simulation, unitary coupled cluster ansatz

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review