Islands outside the horizon
Open accessAbstract
We consider an AdS$_2$ black hole in equilibrium with a bath, which we take to have a dual description as (0+1)-dimensional quantum mechanical system coupled to a (1+1)-dimensional field theory serving as the bath. We compute the entropies of both the quantum mechanical degrees of freedom and of the bath separately, while allowing contributions from entanglement wedge "islands". We find situations where the island extends {\it outside} the black hole horizon. This suggests possible causality paradoxes which we show are avoided because of the quantum focusing conjecture. Finally, we formulate a version of the information paradox for a black hole in contact with a bath in the Hartle-Hawking state, and demonstrate the role of islands in resolving this paradox.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a very simple version of the information paradox at zero temperature.
“There is a very simple version of the information paradox at zero temperature [14].”
From Replica wormholes and the entropy of Hawking radiation (2020) · cites this paper as [14]
The Introduction (p. 3) places the paper’s version of the information paradox in a black hole–bath system at finite temperature. It separately describes the zero-temperature case as an entanglement-wedge calculation, not as that paradox. The Discussion (p. 21) calls the paradox simple, but identifies its setting as a two-sided black hole in the Hartle–Hawking state. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIf the left end of the island A' is placed behind the original horizon of the right black hole, the quantum focusing conjecture implies Sgen would monotonically decrease toward the left boundary along a light ray, contradicting the divergence of the dilaton and Sgen at the left boundary.
“It also follows from the quantum focusing conjecture [12]: if the left end of the island A is placed behind the original horizon of the right black hole, one can send a light ray from A to the left physical boundary where φ ∼ φr/ .”
From Replica wormholes for an evaporating 2D black hole (2021) · cites this paper as [12]
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSince the radius was calculated only to O(G_N), higher order corrections can potentially move the quantum extremal surface outside the horizon; for the entanglement wedge of the CFT plus all future ingoing thermal modes, the RT surface cannot end up outside the event horizon without creating a paradox, but for the CFT alone corrections from a finite interval of infalling thermal modes push the RT面
“In that case, corrections from only having a finite interval of infalling thermal modes pushes the RT surface an O(G 2 N ) radial distance outside the horizon, as was shown in [87] after this paper first appeared on arXiv.”
From Entanglement wedge reconstruction and the information paradox (2020) · cites this paper as [87]
Split into 3 atoms — 0 confirmed, 3 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe AdS2 region is supposed to be a quantum system with e^{S0} states.
“However, the AdS 2 region is supposed to be a quantum system with e S 0 states.”
From Replica wormholes and the entropy of Hawking radiation (2020) · cites this paper as [14]
Section 2 (pp. 4–5) describes a quantum system that gives rise to the AdS₂ region, and the information-paradox discussion (p. 18) refers to a finite number of states in the boundary quantum systems. Our copy does not specify that the number is e^{S₀}, so the quantitative part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the late-time limit of interest, the entropy of the two-interval cut region can be well-approximated using the formula for the entropy of a single interval in 2d CFT.
“But in the late-time limit of interest, it can be wellapproximated [18] using the formula for the entropy of a single interval, which is simple in 2d CFT.”
From Replica wormholes and the black hole interior (2022) · cites this paper as [18]
To see the information paradox for eternal black holes, one must consider the entropy of two disjoint intervals, with one on each side of the black hole [12].
“to see the information paradox, one must consider the entropy of two disjoint intervals, with one on each side of the black hole [12].”
From Replica wormholes for an evaporating 2D black hole (2021) · cites this paper as [12]
There is also an information paradox for eternal black holes [12], and replica wormholes can be applied in this context [13].
“There is also an information paradox for eternal black holes [12], and replica wormholes can be applied in this context [13].”
From Replica wormholes for an evaporating 2D black hole (2021) · cites this paper as [12]
In a unitary theory, S_R(t) should saturate at around twice the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of each black hole.
“In a unitary theory, S R ( t ) should saturate at around the twice the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of each black hole, see figure 5. This was confirmed using the island rule in [14].”
From Replica wormholes and the entropy of Hawking radiation (2020) · cites this paper as [14]
The contradiction is resolved by including an island, as in figure 13.
“This is resolved by including an island, as in figure 13 [14].”
From Replica wormholes and the entropy of Hawking radiation (2020) · cites this paper as [14]
The argument of the previous paragraph can be explicitly checked and one indeed obtains the sum over the two single interval problems.
“So in this case, the argument of the previous paragraph can be explicitly checked and one indeed obtains that we get the sum over the two single interval problems [14].”
From Replica wormholes and the entropy of Hawking radiation (2020) · cites this paper as [14]
For a two-sided black hole in AdS2 gravity, the island and its mirror were found to be outside the event horizon [12]; this remains true for the eternal RST black hole.
“For a two-sided black hole in AdS 2 gravity, the island and its mirror were found to be outside the event horizon [12]. This remains true here as well.”
From Page curve for an evaporating black hole (2020) · cites this paper as [12]
The signal-emission time result is in line with a similar result in [12]; because the black hole is in asymptotically flat spacetime and not AdS2, the time difference t_A - t_obs_A explicitly depends on the location of the anchor curve.
“This is in line with a similar result in [12]. However, because our black hole is in asymptotically flat spacetime and not AdS 2 the time difference t A -t obs A explicitly depends on the location of the anchor curve.”
From Page curve for an evaporating black hole (2020) · cites this paper as [12]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Ryu, S., & Takayanagi, T. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.181602 · Cited by 4,302 · see citing works
Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse
Hawking, S. W. (1976) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.14.2460 · Cited by 2,554 · see citing works
Bulk locality and quantum error correction in AdS/CFT
Almheiri, A., Dong, X., & Harlow, D. (2015) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2015)163 · Cited by 802 · see citing works
Self-citationJensen, K. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.111601 · Cited by 695 · see citing works
On the dynamics of near-extremal black holes
Nayak, P., Shukla, A., Soni, R. M., Trivedi, S. P., & Vishal, V. (2018) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2018)048 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Holographic proof of the quantum null energy condition
Koeller, J., & Leichenauer, S. (2016) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.024026 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- [1][1] Geoffrey Penington, 'Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,' (2019), arXiv:1905.08255 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [2][2] Ahmed Almheiri, Netta Engelhardt, Donald Marolf, and Henry Maxfield, 'The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,' (2019), arXiv:1905.08762 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [3][3] Ahmed Almheiri, Raghu Mahajan, Juan Maldacena, and Ying Zhao, 'The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry,' (2019), arXiv:1908.10996 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [4][4] Raphael Bousso, Zachary Fisher, Stefan Leichenauer, and Aron C. Wall, 'Quantum focusing conjecture,' Phys. Rev. D93 , 064044 (2016), arXiv:1506.02669 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [7][7] Ahmed Almheiri, Donald Marolf, Joseph Polchinski, and James Sully, 'Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?.' JHEP 02 , 062 (2013), arXiv:1207.3123 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [8][8] Samir D. Mathur, 'What is the dual of two entangled CFTs?.' (2014), arXiv:1402.6378 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [9][9] Julius Engels¨ oy, Thomas G. Mertens, and Herman Verlinde, 'An investigation of AdS 2 backreaction and holography,' JHEP 07 , 139 (2016), arXiv:1606.03438 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [10][10] Ahmed Almheiri and Joseph Polchinski, 'Models of AdS 2 backreaction and holography,' JHEP 11 , 014 (2015), arXiv:1402.6334 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [11][11] Juan Maldacena, Douglas Stanford, and Zhenbin Yang, 'Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space,' PTEP 2016 , 12C104 (2016), arXiv:1606.01857 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [12][12] Kristan Jensen, 'Chaos in AdS 2 Holography,' Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 , 111601 (2016), arXiv:1605.06098 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [14][14] Netta Engelhardt and Aron C. Wall, 'Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime,' JHEP 01 , 073 (2015), arXiv:1408.3203 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [15][15] Aron C. Wall, 'Maximin Surfaces, and the Strong Subadditivity of the Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy,' Class. Quant. Grav. 31 , 225007 (2014), arXiv:1211.3494 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [16][16] Veronika E. Hubeny and Mukund Rangamani, 'Causal Holographic Information,' JHEP 06 , 114 (2012), arXiv:1204.1698 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [17][17] Andrew Strominger and David Mattoon Thompson, 'A Quantum Bousso bound,' Phys. Rev. D70 , 044007 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0303067 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [18][18] Aron C. Wall, 'Lower Bound on the Energy Density in Classical and Quantum Field Theories,' Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 , 151601 (2017), arXiv:1701.03196 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [19][19] Raphael Bousso, Zachary Fisher, Jason Koeller, Stefan Leichenauer, and Aron C. Wall, 'Proof of the Quantum Null Energy Condition,' Phys. Rev. D93 , 024017 (2016), arXiv:1509.02542 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [20][20] Srivatsan Balakrishnan, Thomas Faulkner, Zuhair U. Khandker, and Huajia Wang, 'A General Proof of the Quantum Null Energy Condition,' JHEP 09 , 020 (2019), arXiv:1706.09432 [hepth] - · arXiv
- [21][21] Fikret Ceyhan and Thomas Faulkner, 'Recovering the QNEC from the ANEC,' (2018), arXiv:1812.04683 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [23][23] Aron C. Wall, 'Testing the Generalized Second Law in 1+1 dimensional Conformal Vacua: An Argument for the Causal Horizon,' Phys. Rev. D85 , 024015 (2012), arXiv:1105.3520 [gr-qc] - · arXiv
- [24][24] Patrick Hayden and John Preskill, 'Black holes as mirrors: Quantum information in random subsystems,' JHEP 09 , 120 (2007), arXiv:0708.4025 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [25][25] Stefan Leichenauer, 'Disrupting Entanglement of Black Holes,' Phys. Rev. D90 , 046009 (2014), arXiv:1405.7365 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [26][26] Ping Gao, Daniel Louis Jafferis, and Aron Wall, 'Traversable Wormholes via a Double Trace Deformation,' JHEP 12 , 151 (2017), arXiv:1608.05687 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [28][28] Juan Maldacena, Douglas Stanford, and Zhenbin Yang, 'Diving into traversable wormholes,' Fortsch. Phys. 65 , 1700034 (2017), arXiv:1704.05333 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [29][29] Juan Martin Maldacena, 'Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,' JHEP 04 , 021 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0106112 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [30][30] Kyriakos Papadodimas and Suvrat Raju, 'Local Operators in the Eternal Black Hole,' Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 , 211601 (2015), arXiv:1502.06692 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [31][31] Thomas Hartman and Juan Maldacena, 'Time Evolution of Entanglement Entropy from Black Hole Interiors,' JHEP 05 , 014 (2013), arXiv:1303.1080 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [32][32] Shinsei Ryu and Tadashi Takayanagi, 'Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,' Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 , 181602 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0603001 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [33][33] Veronika E. Hubeny, Mukund Rangamani, and Tadashi Takayanagi, 'A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal,' JHEP 07 , 062 (2007), arXiv:0705.0016 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [34][34] Juan Maldacena and Leonard Susskind, 'Cool horizons for entangled black holes,' Fortsch. Phys. 61 , 781-811 (2013), arXiv:1306.0533 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [35][35] Leonard Susskind, 'The Transfer of Entanglement: The Case for Firewalls,' (2012), arXiv:1210.2098 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [36][36] Kyriakos Papadodimas and Suvrat Raju, 'An Infalling Observer in AdS/CFT,' JHEP 10 , 212 (2013), arXiv:1211.6767 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [38][38] Subir Sachdev, 'Universal low temperature theory of charged black holes with AdS 2 horizons,' Journal of Mathematical Physics 60, 052303 (2019) , J. Math. Phys. 60 , 052303 (2019), arXiv:1902.04078 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [39][39] Juan Maldacena, Alexey Milekhin, and Fedor Popov, 'Traversable wormholes in four dimensions,' (2018), arXiv:1807.04726 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [40][40] Alek Bedroya and Cumrun Vafa, 'Trans-Planckian Censorship and the Swampland,' (2019), arXiv:1909.11063 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [41][41] Jerome Martin and Robert H. Brandenberger, 'The TransPlanckian problem of inflationary cosmology,' Phys. Rev. D63 , 123501 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0005209 [hep-th] - · arXiv
- [42][42] Robert H. Brandenberger and Jerome Martin, 'Trans-Planckian Issues for Inflationary Cosmology,' Class. Quant. Grav. 30 , 113001 (2013), arXiv:1211.6753 [astro-ph.CO] - · arXiv
- [44][44] Andrew Strominger, 'Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory,' (2017), arXiv:1703.05448 [hep-th] · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Entanglement wedge reconstruction and the information paradox
Penington, G. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2020)002 · Cited by 968 · see citing works
Replica wormholes and the entropy of Hawking radiation
Almheiri, A., Hartman, T., Maldacena, J., Shaghoulian, E., & Tajdini, A. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2020)013 · Cited by 910 · see citing works
“gion is coupled to JT gravity. In a unitary theory, S R(t) should saturate at around the twice the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of each black hole, see gure5. This was conrmed using the island rule in [14]. 1.3 Replica wormholes to the rescue To reproduce the unitary answer directly from a gravity calculation, we will u…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationReplica wormholes and the black hole interior
Penington, G., Shenker, S. H., Stanford, D., & Yang, Z. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.11977 · Cited by 809
Replica wormholes and the black hole interior
Penington, G., Shenker, S. H., Stanford, D., & Yang, Z. (2022) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2022)205 · Cited by 807 · see citing works
The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry
Almheiri, A., Mahajan, R., Maldacena, J., & Zhao, Y. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2020)149 · Cited by 749 · see citing works
Self-citationMarolf, D., & Maxfield, H. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2020)044 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Lessons from the Information Paradox
Raju, S. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.05770 · Cited by 234
Information radiation in BCFT models of black holes
Rozali, M., Sully, J., Van Raamsdonk, M., Waddell, C., & Wakeham, D. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2020)004 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity
Mertens, T. G., & Turiaci, G. J. (2023) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-023-00046-1 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Page curve for an evaporating black hole
Gautason, F. F., Schneiderbauer, L., Sybesma, W., & Thorlacius, L. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2020)091 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Eigenstate Thermalization and Disorder Averaging in Gravity
Pollack, J., Rozali, M., Sully, J., & Wakeham, D. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.021601 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Islands and Page curves for evaporating black holes in JT gravity
Hollowood, T. J., & Kumar, S. P. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2020)094 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Replica wormholes for an evaporating 2D black hole
Goto, K., Hartman, T., & Tajdini, A. (2021) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2021)289 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Unitarity from a smooth horizon?
Bousso, R., & Tomašević, M. (2020) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.106019 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Holographic spacetime, black holes and quantum error correcting codes: a review
Kibe, T., Mandayam, P., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2022) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10382-1 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“It has also been shown that islands can extend outside of event horizons [148].”
BackgroundIsland finder and entropy bound
Bousso, R., & Shahbazi-Moghaddam, A. (2021) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.106005 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Free energy for deformed Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity
Alishahiha, M., Faraji Astaneh, A., Jafari, G., Naseh, A., & Taghavi, B. (2021) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.046005 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Almheiri, A., Mahajan, R., & Maldacena, J.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Advanced Study (US)
- Princeton University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.11077
- OpenAlex
- W2981489700
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
- Keywords
- AdS2 black hole, entanglement islands, entanglement wedge, black hole information paradox, black hole thermodynamics, two-dimensional field theory, Hartle-Hawking state, causality, event horizon
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review