PreprintCited by 191Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesQuantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect

Islands outside the horizon

Open access
Almheiri, Ahmed, Mahajan, Raghu, Maldacena, Juan·2019·arXiv

Abstract

We consider an AdS$_2$ black hole in equilibrium with a bath, which we take to have a dual description as (0+1)-dimensional quantum mechanical system coupled to a (1+1)-dimensional field theory serving as the bath. We compute the entropies of both the quantum mechanical degrees of freedom and of the bath separately, while allowing contributions from entanglement wedge "islands". We find situations where the island extends {\it outside} the black hole horizon. This suggests possible causality paradoxes which we show are avoided because of the quantum focusing conjecture. Finally, we formulate a version of the information paradox for a black hole in contact with a bath in the Hartle-Hawking state, and demonstrate the role of islands in resolving this paradox.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1910.11077

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a very simple version of the information paradox at zero temperature.

    “There is a very simple version of the information paradox at zero temperature [14].”

    From Replica wormholes and the entropy of Hawking radiation (2020) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Introduction (p. 3) places the paper’s version of the information paradox in a black hole–bath system at finite temperature. It separately describes the zero-temperature case as an entanglement-wedge calculation, not as that paradox. The Discussion (p. 21) calls the paradox simple, but identifies its setting as a two-sided black hole in the Hartle–Hawking state. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • If the left end of the island A' is placed behind the original horizon of the right black hole, the quantum focusing conjecture implies Sgen would monotonically decrease toward the left boundary along a light ray, contradicting the divergence of the dilaton and Sgen at the left boundary.

    “It also follows from the quantum focusing conjecture [12]: if the left end of the island A is placed behind the original horizon of the right black hole, one can send a light ray from A to the left physical boundary where φ ∼ φr/ .”

    From Replica wormholes for an evaporating 2D black hole (2021) · cites this paper as [12]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Since the radius was calculated only to O(G_N), higher order corrections can potentially move the quantum extremal surface outside the horizon; for the entanglement wedge of the CFT plus all future ingoing thermal modes, the RT surface cannot end up outside the event horizon without creating a paradox, but for the CFT alone corrections from a finite interval of infalling thermal modes push the RT面

    “In that case, corrections from only having a finite interval of infalling thermal modes pushes the RT surface an O(G 2 N ) radial distance outside the horizon, as was shown in [87] after this paper first appeared on arXiv.”

    From Entanglement wedge reconstruction and the information paradox (2020) · cites this paper as [87]

    Split into 3 atoms — 0 confirmed, 3 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The AdS2 region is supposed to be a quantum system with e^{S0} states.

    “However, the AdS 2 region is supposed to be a quantum system with e S 0 states.”

    From Replica wormholes and the entropy of Hawking radiation (2020) · cites this paper as [14]

    Section 2 (pp. 4–5) describes a quantum system that gives rise to the AdS₂ region, and the information-paradox discussion (p. 18) refers to a finite number of states in the boundary quantum systems. Our copy does not specify that the number is e^{S₀}, so the quantitative part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the late-time limit of interest, the entropy of the two-interval cut region can be well-approximated using the formula for the entropy of a single interval in 2d CFT.

    “But in the late-time limit of interest, it can be wellapproximated [18] using the formula for the entropy of a single interval, which is simple in 2d CFT.”

    From Replica wormholes and the black hole interior (2022) · cites this paper as [18]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. [1][1] Geoffrey Penington, 'Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,' (2019), arXiv:1905.08255 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  2. [2][2] Ahmed Almheiri, Netta Engelhardt, Donald Marolf, and Henry Maxfield, 'The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,' (2019), arXiv:1905.08762 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  3. [3][3] Ahmed Almheiri, Raghu Mahajan, Juan Maldacena, and Ying Zhao, 'The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry,' (2019), arXiv:1908.10996 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  4. [4][4] Raphael Bousso, Zachary Fisher, Stefan Leichenauer, and Aron C. Wall, 'Quantum focusing conjecture,' Phys. Rev. D93 , 064044 (2016), arXiv:1506.02669 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  5. [7][7] Ahmed Almheiri, Donald Marolf, Joseph Polchinski, and James Sully, 'Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?.' JHEP 02 , 062 (2013), arXiv:1207.3123 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  6. [8][8] Samir D. Mathur, 'What is the dual of two entangled CFTs?.' (2014), arXiv:1402.6378 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  7. [9][9] Julius Engels¨ oy, Thomas G. Mertens, and Herman Verlinde, 'An investigation of AdS 2 backreaction and holography,' JHEP 07 , 139 (2016), arXiv:1606.03438 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  8. [10][10] Ahmed Almheiri and Joseph Polchinski, 'Models of AdS 2 backreaction and holography,' JHEP 11 , 014 (2015), arXiv:1402.6334 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  9. [11][11] Juan Maldacena, Douglas Stanford, and Zhenbin Yang, 'Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space,' PTEP 2016 , 12C104 (2016), arXiv:1606.01857 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  10. [12][12] Kristan Jensen, 'Chaos in AdS 2 Holography,' Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 , 111601 (2016), arXiv:1605.06098 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  11. [14][14] Netta Engelhardt and Aron C. Wall, 'Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime,' JHEP 01 , 073 (2015), arXiv:1408.3203 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  12. [15][15] Aron C. Wall, 'Maximin Surfaces, and the Strong Subadditivity of the Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy,' Class. Quant. Grav. 31 , 225007 (2014), arXiv:1211.3494 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  13. [16][16] Veronika E. Hubeny and Mukund Rangamani, 'Causal Holographic Information,' JHEP 06 , 114 (2012), arXiv:1204.1698 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  14. [17][17] Andrew Strominger and David Mattoon Thompson, 'A Quantum Bousso bound,' Phys. Rev. D70 , 044007 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0303067 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  15. [18][18] Aron C. Wall, 'Lower Bound on the Energy Density in Classical and Quantum Field Theories,' Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 , 151601 (2017), arXiv:1701.03196 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  16. [19][19] Raphael Bousso, Zachary Fisher, Jason Koeller, Stefan Leichenauer, and Aron C. Wall, 'Proof of the Quantum Null Energy Condition,' Phys. Rev. D93 , 024017 (2016), arXiv:1509.02542 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  17. [20][20] Srivatsan Balakrishnan, Thomas Faulkner, Zuhair U. Khandker, and Huajia Wang, 'A General Proof of the Quantum Null Energy Condition,' JHEP 09 , 020 (2019), arXiv:1706.09432 [hepth] - · arXiv
  18. [21][21] Fikret Ceyhan and Thomas Faulkner, 'Recovering the QNEC from the ANEC,' (2018), arXiv:1812.04683 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  19. [23][23] Aron C. Wall, 'Testing the Generalized Second Law in 1+1 dimensional Conformal Vacua: An Argument for the Causal Horizon,' Phys. Rev. D85 , 024015 (2012), arXiv:1105.3520 [gr-qc] - · arXiv
  20. [24][24] Patrick Hayden and John Preskill, 'Black holes as mirrors: Quantum information in random subsystems,' JHEP 09 , 120 (2007), arXiv:0708.4025 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  21. [25][25] Stefan Leichenauer, 'Disrupting Entanglement of Black Holes,' Phys. Rev. D90 , 046009 (2014), arXiv:1405.7365 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  22. [26][26] Ping Gao, Daniel Louis Jafferis, and Aron Wall, 'Traversable Wormholes via a Double Trace Deformation,' JHEP 12 , 151 (2017), arXiv:1608.05687 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  23. [28][28] Juan Maldacena, Douglas Stanford, and Zhenbin Yang, 'Diving into traversable wormholes,' Fortsch. Phys. 65 , 1700034 (2017), arXiv:1704.05333 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  24. [29][29] Juan Martin Maldacena, 'Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,' JHEP 04 , 021 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0106112 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  25. [30][30] Kyriakos Papadodimas and Suvrat Raju, 'Local Operators in the Eternal Black Hole,' Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 , 211601 (2015), arXiv:1502.06692 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  26. [31][31] Thomas Hartman and Juan Maldacena, 'Time Evolution of Entanglement Entropy from Black Hole Interiors,' JHEP 05 , 014 (2013), arXiv:1303.1080 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  27. [32][32] Shinsei Ryu and Tadashi Takayanagi, 'Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,' Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 , 181602 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0603001 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  28. [33][33] Veronika E. Hubeny, Mukund Rangamani, and Tadashi Takayanagi, 'A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal,' JHEP 07 , 062 (2007), arXiv:0705.0016 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  29. [34][34] Juan Maldacena and Leonard Susskind, 'Cool horizons for entangled black holes,' Fortsch. Phys. 61 , 781-811 (2013), arXiv:1306.0533 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  30. [35][35] Leonard Susskind, 'The Transfer of Entanglement: The Case for Firewalls,' (2012), arXiv:1210.2098 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  31. [36][36] Kyriakos Papadodimas and Suvrat Raju, 'An Infalling Observer in AdS/CFT,' JHEP 10 , 212 (2013), arXiv:1211.6767 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  32. [38][38] Subir Sachdev, 'Universal low temperature theory of charged black holes with AdS 2 horizons,' Journal of Mathematical Physics 60, 052303 (2019) , J. Math. Phys. 60 , 052303 (2019), arXiv:1902.04078 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  33. [39][39] Juan Maldacena, Alexey Milekhin, and Fedor Popov, 'Traversable wormholes in four dimensions,' (2018), arXiv:1807.04726 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  34. [40][40] Alek Bedroya and Cumrun Vafa, 'Trans-Planckian Censorship and the Swampland,' (2019), arXiv:1909.11063 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  35. [41][41] Jerome Martin and Robert H. Brandenberger, 'The TransPlanckian problem of inflationary cosmology,' Phys. Rev. D63 , 123501 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0005209 [hep-th] - · arXiv
  36. [42][42] Robert H. Brandenberger and Jerome Martin, 'Trans-Planckian Issues for Inflationary Cosmology,' Class. Quant. Grav. 30 , 113001 (2013), arXiv:1211.6753 [astro-ph.CO] - · arXiv
  37. [44][44] Andrew Strominger, 'Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory,' (2017), arXiv:1703.05448 [hep-th] · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Almheiri, A., Mahajan, R., & Maldacena, J.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Advanced Study (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981489700
Cited by
191
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
Keywords
AdS2 black hole, entanglement islands, entanglement wedge, black hole information paradox, black hole thermodynamics, two-dimensional field theory, Hartle-Hawking state, causality, event horizon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review