CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 1,065Artificial Intelligence in GamesReinforcement Learning in RoboticsArtificial Intelligence Applications

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 35 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 2 are not checked yet.

Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learning

Open access
OpenAI, :, Berner, Christopher, Brockman, Greg, Chan, Brooke, Cheung, Vicki, Dębiak, Przemysław, Dennison, Christy, Farhi, David, Fischer, Quirin, Hashme, Shariq, Hesse, Chris, Józefowicz, Rafal, Gray, Scott, Olsson, Catherine, Pachocki, Jakub, Petrov, Michael, Pinto, Henrique P. d. O., Raiman, Jonathan, Salimans, Tim, Schlatter, Jeremy, Schneider, Jonas, Sidor, Szymon, Sutskever, Ilya, Tang, Jie, Wolski, Filip, Zhang, Susan·2019·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1912.06680arXiv 1912.06680
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

On April 13th, 2019, OpenAI Five became the first AI system to defeat the world champions at an esports game. The game of Dota 2 presents novel challenges for AI systems such as long time horizons, imperfect information, and complex, continuous state-action spaces, all challenges which will become increasingly central to more capable AI systems. OpenAI Five leveraged existing reinforcement learning techniques, scaled to learn from batches of approximately 2 million frames every 2 seconds. We developed a distributed training system and tools for continual training which allowed us to train OpenAI Five for 10 months. By defeating the Dota 2 world champion (Team OG), OpenAI Five demonstrates that self-play reinforcement learning can achieve superhuman performance on a difficult task.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1912.06680

Cites

35 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [15]15. Konda, V. R. & Tsitsiklis, J. N. Actor-critic algorithms in Advances in neural information processing systems (2000), 1008-1014.
  2. [16]16. Mnih, V., Badia, A. P., Mirza, M., Graves, A., Lillicrap, T., Harley, T., Silver, D. & Kavukcuoglu, K. Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning in International conference on machine learning (2016), 1928-1937.
  3. [17]17. Schulman, J., Moritz, P., Levine, S., Jordan, M. I. & Abbeel, P. High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimation. CoRR abs/1506.02438 (2016). · arXiv
  4. [23]23. Chen, T., Goodfellow, I. J. & Shlens, J. Net2Net: Accelerating Learning via Knowledge Transfer in 4th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2016, San Juan, Puerto Rico, May 2-4, 2016, Conference Track Proceedings (2016). < http://arxiv.org/abs/ 1511.05641 >.
  5. [27]27. Herbrich, R., Minka, T. & Graepel, T. TrueSkill: a Bayesian skill rating system in Advances in neural information processing systems (2007), 569-576.
  6. [38]38. Anthony, T., Tian, Z. & Barber, D. Thinking fast and slow with deep learning and tree search in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2017), 5360-5370.
  7. [41]41. Kulkarni, T. D., Narasimhan, K., Saeedi, A. & Tenenbaum, J. Hierarchical deep reinforcement learning: Integrating temporal abstraction and intrinsic motivation in Advances in neural information processing systems (2016), 3675-3683.
  8. [47]47. Mnih, V., Badia, A. P., Mirza, M., Graves, A., Lillicrap, T., Harley, T., Silver, D. & Kavukcuoglu, K. Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learning in Proceedings of The 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning (eds Balcan, M. F. & Weinberger, K. Q.) 48 (PMLR, New York, New York, USA, June 2016), 1928-1937. < http://proceedings.mlr.press/ v48/mniha16.html >.
  9. [49]49. Fahlman, S. E. & Lebiere, C. in (ed Touretzky, D. S.) 524-532 (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 1990). isbn : 1-55860-100-7. < http://dl.acm.org/ citation.cfm?id=109230.107380 >.
  10. [53]53. Rusu, A. A., Rabinowitz, N. C., Desjardins, G., Soyer, H., Kirkpatrick, J., Kavukcuoglu, K., Pascanu, R. & Hadsell, R. Progressive Neural Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.04671 (2016). · arXiv
  11. [54]54. Hinton, G., Vinyals, O. & Dean, J. Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network in NIPS Deep Learning and Representation Learning Workshop (2015). < http://arxiv.org/abs/ 1503.02531 >.
  12. [59]59. Brockman, G., Cheung, V., Pettersson, L., Schneider, J., Schulman, J., Tang, J. & Zaremba, W. OpenAI Gym. CoRR abs/1606.01540. arXiv: 1606.01540 . < http://arxiv.org/ abs/1606.01540 > (2016). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 801–900 of 1,023

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
OpenAI, :, Berner, C., Brockman, G., Chan, B., Cheung, V., Dębiak, P., Dennison, C., Farhi, D., Fischer, Q., Hashme, S., Hesse, C., Józefowicz, R., Gray, S., Olsson, C., Pachocki, J., Petrov, M., Pinto, H. P. D. O., Raiman, J., Salimans, T., Schlatter, J., Schneider, J., Sidor, S., Sutskever, I., Tang, J., Wolski, F., & Zhang, S.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1912.06680
arXiv
1912.06680
OpenAlex
W2996037775
Cited by
1,065
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 178 · 2023: 186 · 2022: 197 · 2021: 273 · 2020: 152 · 2019: 7
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
Dota 2, self-play, distributed training, continuous training, imperfect information games, long time horizons, continuous state and action spaces, esports

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review