Cited by 4,202Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

Learning without Forgetting

Li, Zhizhong, Hoiem, Derek·2018·IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Abstract

When building a unified vision system or gradually adding new apabilities to a system, the usual assumption is that training data for all tasks is always available. However, as the number of tasks grows, storing and retraining on such data becomes infeasible. A new problem arises where we add new capabilities to a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), but the training data for its existing capabilities are unavailable. We propose our Learning without Forgetting method, which uses only new task data to train the network while preserving the original capabilities. Our method performs favorably compared to commonly used feature extraction and fine-tuning adaption techniques and performs similarly to multitask learning that uses original task data we assume unavailable. A more surprising observation is that Learning without Forgetting may be able to replace fine-tuning with similar old and new task datasets for improved new task performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpami.2017.2773081

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LwF has even lower AP than direct fine-tuning in the detection task.

    “Table 1 shows that although LwF works well in incremental classification, it has even lower AP than direct fine-tuning in detection task”
  • DBLL excels in efficiently preserving knowledge through selective experience replay without needing complex architectural changes or parameter adjustments.

    “Compared to ABLL and RBLL, Data-Based Lifelong Learning (DBLL) excels in efficiently preserving knowledge through selective experience replay [17,18] without needing complex architectural changes or parameter adjustments.”
  • Using learning without forgetting, the model was fine-tuned on nerve-specific data while regularizing its outputs to general vessel-related structural knowledge, thereby reducing the risk of catastrophic forgetting.

    “Using learning without forgetting, the model was fine-tuned on nerve-specific data while regularizing its outputs to general vessel-related structural knowledge represented in the pretrained weights, thereby reducing the risk of catastrophic forgetting49.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Z., & Hoiem, D.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
2018-12-01
Volume
40
Issue
12
Pages
2935-2947
ISSN
  • 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-9292
  • 1939-3539
OpenAlex
W2473930607
Cited by
4,202
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 596 · 2025: 747 · 2024: 729 · 2023: 654 · 2022: 485 · 2021: 434 · 2020: 311 · 2019: 165 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 3
FWCI
90.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • NSF (14-46765, 10-53768)
  • ONR MURI (N000014-16-1-2007)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
learning without forgetting, catastrophic forgetting, convolutional neural networks, continual learning, fine-tuning, multi-task learning, feature extraction, vision system

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review