PreprintCited by 255Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

How Much Position Information Do Convolutional Neural Networks Encode?

Open access
Islam, Md Amirul, Jia, Sen, Bruce, Neil D. B.·2020·arXiv

Abstract

In contrast to fully connected networks, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) achieve efficiency by learning weights associated with local filters with a finite spatial extent. An implication of this is that a filter may know what it is looking at, but not where it is positioned in the image. Information concerning absolute position is inherently useful, and it is reasonable to assume that deep CNNs may implicitly learn to encode this information if there is a means to do so. In this paper, we test this hypothesis revealing the surprising degree of absolute position information that is encoded in commonly used neural networks. A comprehensive set of experiments show the validity of this hypothesis and shed light on how and where this information is represented while offering clues to where positional information is derived from in deep CNNs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2001.08248

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Relative positional encodings cannot work equally well as absolute ones because image recognition requires absolute position information.

    “Last but not least, the relative positional encodings cannot work equally well as the absolute ones, because the image recognition task still requires absolute position information (Islam et al., 2020), which the relative positional encodings fail to provide.”

    From Conditional Positional Encodings for Vision Transformers (2021) · cites this paper as Islam et al., 2020

    The Introduction (p. 1) says absolute spatial information is important in position-dependent tasks, such as semantic segmentation and salient object detection. It does not establish that image recognition generally requires absolute position information, or compare the performance of relative and absolute positional encodings. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Vijay Badrinarayanan, Alex Kendall, and Roberto Cipolla. Segnet: A deep convolutional encoderdecoder architecture for scene segmentation. TPAMI , 2017.
  2. Md Amirul Islam, Mrigank Rochan, Neil DB Bruce, and Yang Wang. Gated feedback refinement network for dense image labeling. In CVPR , 2017.
  3. Md Amirul Islam, Mahmoud Kalash, and Neil DB Bruce. Revisiting salient object detection: Simultaneous detection, ranking, and subitizing of multiple salient objects. In CVPR , 2018.
  4. Sen Jia and Neil DB Bruce. Richer and deeper supervision network for salient object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.02425 , 2019. · arXiv
  5. Nian Liu, Junwei Han, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. Picanet: Learning pixel-wise contextual attention for saliency detection. In CVPR , 2018.
  6. Ramprasaath R Selvaraju, Michael Cogswell, Abhishek Das, Ramakrishna Vedantam, Devi Parikh, and Dhruv Batra. Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. In ICCV , 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Islam, M. A., Jia, S., & Bruce, N. D. B.
Affiliations
  • Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
  • Vector Institute (CA)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995426144
Cited by
253
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
positional information, convolutional neural networks, spatial representation, local filters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review