PreprintCited by 10Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsEmotion and Mood RecognitionAdvanced Image Fusion Techniques

Multimodal Data Fusion based on the Global Workspace Theory

Open access
Bao, Cong, Fountas, Zafeirios, Olugbade, Temitayo, Bianchi-Berthouze, Nadia·2020·arXiv

Abstract

We propose a novel neural network architecture, named the Global Workspace Network (GWN), which addresses the challenge of dynamic and unspecified uncertainties in multimodal data fusion. Our GWN is a model of attention across modalities and evolving through time, and is inspired by the well-established Global Workspace Theory from the field of cognitive science. The GWN achieved average F1 score of 0.92 for discrimination between pain patients and healthy participants and average F1 score = 0.75 for further classification of three pain levels for a patient, both based on the multimodal EmoPain dataset captured from people with chronic pain and healthy people performing different types of exercise movements in unconstrained settings. In these tasks, the GWN significantly outperforms the typical fusion approach of merging by concatenation. We further provide extensive analysis of the behaviour of the GWN and its ability to address uncertainties (hidden noise) in multimodal data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2001.09485

Cites

46 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared to other scientific theories of consciousness, many more proposals have been made for the implementation of GWT in artificial systems.

    “Compared to other scientific theories of consciousness, many more proposals have been made for the implementation of GWT in artificial systems (e.g.Franklin & Graesser 1999, Shanahan 2006, Bao et al. 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., and Bengio, Y. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. In 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, May 79, 2015, Conference Track Proceedings , 2015. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.0473 . · arXiv
  2. Baltrusaitis, T., Ahuja, C., and Morency, L. Multimodal machine learning: A survey and taxonomy. CoRR , abs/1705.09406, 2017. URL http://arxiv.org/ abs/1705.09406 . · arXiv
  3. Bollegala, D. and Bao, C. Learning word meta-embeddings by autoencoding. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics , pp. 1650-1661, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, August 2018. Association for Computational Linguistics. URL https: //www.aclweb.org/anthology/C18-1140 .
  4. Cheng, J., Dong, L., and Lapata, M. Long shortterm memory-networks for machine reading. CoRR , abs/1601.06733, 2016. URL http://arxiv.org/ abs/1601.06733 . · arXiv
  5. Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Bahdanau, D., and Bengio, Y. On the properties of neural machine translation: Encoderdecoder approaches. CoRR , abs/1409.1259, 2014. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.1259 . · arXiv
  6. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. CoRR , abs/1512.03385, 2015. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.03385 . · arXiv
  7. Jensen, M. P. and Karoly, P. Self-report scales and procedures for assessing pain in adults. Handbook of pain assessment , pp. 135-151, 1992.
  8. Lee, M. A., Zhu, Y., Srinivasan, K., Shah, P., Savarese, S., Fei-Fei, L., Garg, A., and Bohg, J. Making sense of vision and touch: Self-supervised learning of multimodal representations for contact-rich tasks. CoRR , abs/1810.10191, 2018. URL http://arxiv.org/ abs/1810.10191 . · arXiv
  9. Miller, A. H., Fisch, A., Dodge, J., Karimi, A., Bordes, A., and Weston, J. Key-value memory networks for directly reading documents. CoRR , abs/1606.03126, 2016. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.03126 . · arXiv
  10. Nair, V. and Hinton, G. E. Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning , ICML'10, pp. 807814, USA, 2010. Omnipress. ISBN 978-1-60558-9077. URL http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm? id=3104322.3104425 .
  11. Olugbade, T. A., Newbold, J. W., Johnson, R. M. G., Volta, E., Alborno, P., Niewiadomski, R., Dillon, M., Volpe, G., and Bianchi-Berthouze, N. Automatic detection of reflective thinking in mathematical problem solving based on unconstrained bodily exploration. CoRR , abs/1812.07941, 2018. URL http://arxiv.org/ abs/1812.07941 . · arXiv
  12. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., and Polosukhin, I. Attention is all you need. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pp. 5998-6008, 2017. URL https://papers.nips.cc/paper/ 7181-attention-is-all-you-need.pdf .
  13. Wang, C., Olugbade, T. A., Mathur, A., de C. Williams, A. C., Lane, N. D., and Bianchi-Berthouze, N. Automatic detection of protective behavior in chronic pain physical rehabilitation: A recurrent neural network approach. CoRR , abs/1902.08990, 2019. URL http: //arxiv.org/abs/1902.08990 . · arXiv
  14. Weston, J., Chopra, S., and Bordes, A. Memory networks. CoRR , abs/1410.3916, 2015. · arXiv
  15. Wu, M. and Goodman, N. Multimodal generative models for scalable weakly-supervised learning. In 32nd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , pp. 5575-5585, 2018.
  16. Zadeh, A., Liang, P. P., Mazumder, N., Poria, S., Cambria, E., and Morency, L.-P. Memory fusion network for multi-view sequential learning. In Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , 2018. imekli, U., Ermi, B., Cemgil, A. T., and Acar, E. Optimal weight learning for coupled tensor factorization with mixed divergences. In 21st European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO 2013) , pp. 1-5, Sep. 2013.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bao, C., Fountas, Z., Olugbade, T., & Bianchi-Berthouze, N.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
Pages
414-422
OpenAlex
W3093683378
Cited by
9
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.62
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (824160)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Advanced Image Fusion Techniques
Keywords
multimodal fusion, global workspace theory, chronic pain, neural network architecture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review