CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 308Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesEmbedded Systems Design Techniques

TensorFlow Quantum: A Software Framework for Quantum Machine Learning

Open access
Broughton, Michael, Verdon, Guillaume, McCourt, Trevor, Martinez, Antonio J., Yoo, Jae Hyeon, Isakov, Sergei V., Massey, Philip, Halavati, Ramin +21 more·2020·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2003.02989arXiv 2003.02989
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We introduce TensorFlow Quantum (TFQ), an open source library for the rapid prototyping of hybrid quantum-classical models for classical or quantum data. This framework offers high-level abstractions for the design and training of both discriminative and generative quantum models under TensorFlow and supports high-performance quantum circuit simulators. We provide an overview of the software architecture and building blocks through several examples and review the theory of hybrid quantum-classical neural networks. We illustrate TFQ functionalities via several basic applications including supervised learning for quantum classification, quantum control, simulating noisy quantum circuits, and quantum approximate optimization. Moreover, we demonstrate how one can apply TFQ to tackle advanced quantum learning tasks including meta-learning, layerwise learning, Hamiltonian learning, sampling thermal states, variational quantum eigensolvers, classification of quantum phase transitions, generative adversarial networks, and reinforcement learning. We hope this framework provides the necessary tools for the quantum computing and machine learning research communities to explore models of both natural and artificial quantum systems, and ultimately discover new quantum algorithms which could potentially yield a quantum advantage.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2003.02989

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The domain of QML and QNN have drawn substantial attention recently as the hope for a quantum advantage in machine learning, motivating the inclusion of the quantum DNN benchmark.

    “The domain of Quantum Machine Learning (QML) and QNN have drawn substantial attention recently [18, 122] as the hope for a quantum advantage in machine learning, thereby motivating the inclusion of the quantum DNN benchmark.”

    From QASMBench: A Low-Level Quantum Benchmark Suite for NISQ Evaluation and Simulation (2023) · cites this paper as [18]

  • General support for cold atom quantum computers in QML frameworks like PennyLane or Tensorflow Quantum does not seem to be en par with hardware offered by large commercial vendors.

    “the general support for cold atom quantum computers in QML frameworks like Penny-Lane [119] or Tensorflow Quantum [120], which are often used in exploratory research, does not seem to be en par with hardware offered by large commercial vendors.”

    From Neutral atom quantum computing hardware: performance and end-user perspective (2023) · cites this paper as [120]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Broughton, M., Verdon, G., McCourt, T., Martinez, A. J., Yoo, J. H., Isakov, S. V., Massey, P., Halavati, R., Niu, M. Y., Zlokapa, A., Peters, E., Lockwood, O., Skolik, A., Jerbi, S., Dunjko, V., Leib, M., Streif, M., Von Dollen, D., Chen, H., Cao, S., Wiersema, R., Huang, H.-Y., McClean, J. R., Babbush, R., Boixo, S., Bacon, D., Ho, A. K., Neven, H., & Mohseni, M.
Affiliations
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (US)
  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
  • Ames Research Center (US)
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2003.02989
arXiv
2003.02989
OpenAlex
W3010243192
Cited by
308
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 32
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Embedded Systems Design Techniques
Keywords
quantum circuit compilation, MLIR, dialect translation, quantum accelerators, compiler infrastructure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review