Cited by 42Network Security and Intrusion DetectionQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Quantum machine learning for intrusion detection of distributed denial of service attacks: a comparative overview

Open access
Payares, Esteban, Martinez-Santos, Juan Carlos·2021·Quantum Computing, Communication, and Simulation

Abstract

In recent years, we have seen an increase in computer attacks through our communication networks worldwide, whether due to cybersecurity systems’ vulnerability or their absence. This paper presents three quantum models to detect distributed denial of service attacks. We compare Quantum Support Vector Machines, hybrid QuantumClassical Neural Networks, and a two-circuit ensemble model running parallel on two quantum processing units. Our work demonstrates quantum models’ effectiveness in supporting current and future cybersecurity systems by obtaining performances close to 100%, being 96% the worst-case scenario. It compares our models’ performance in terms of accuracy and consumption of computational resources.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1117/12.2593297

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior work has reviewed QSVM for DDoS detection and experimentally studied QSVM on NSL-KDD and NB-15 datasets, showing readiness for intrusion detection.

    “For example, [17] reviews a quantum support vector machine (QSVM) constructed to detect DDoS attacks. [18] presents the experimental study of the QSVM running with conventional NSL-KDD and NB-15 datasets, that denotes the QSVM’s readiness to the intrusion detection on common attack datasets.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Abdi, H. and Williams, L. J., "Principal component analysis: Principal component analysis," Wiley Inter- disciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 2, 433-459 (July 2010).
  2. Suykens, J. and Vandewalle, J. Neural Processing Letters 9(3), 293-300 (1999).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Payares, E., & Martinez-Santos, J. C.
Affiliations
Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar (CO)
Corresponding author
Payares, Esteban
Venue
Quantum Computing, Communication, and Simulation
Publisher
SPIE
Published
2021-03-05
Pages
47
OpenAlex
W3135681774
Cited by
42
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
5.32
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Quantum Computing, Communication, and Simulation (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
quantum machine learning, intrusion detection, DDoS attacks, quantum support vector machine, hybrid quantum-classical neural networks, cybersecurity, computational resource consumption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review