The DOI matches its DataCite record; 43 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sub-Image Anomaly Detection with Deep Pyramid Correspondences
Open accessAbstract
Nearest neighbor (kNN) methods utilizing deep pre-trained features exhibit very strong anomaly detection performance when applied to entire images. A limitation of kNN methods is the lack of segmentation map describing where the anomaly lies inside the image. In this work we present a novel anomaly segmentation approach based on alignment between an anomalous image and a constant number of the similar normal images. Our method, Semantic Pyramid Anomaly Detection (SPADE) uses correspondences based on a multi-resolution feature pyramid. SPADE is shown to achieve state-of-the-art performance on unsupervised anomaly detection and localization while requiring virtually no training time.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Compared to image-level memory approaches in [10], we find matching localization and detection performance with only 5 / 1 nominal shots.”
From Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detection (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Due to computational limitations, SPADE requires a preselection stage of feature maps for pixel-level anomaly detection based on a weaker image-level anomaly detection mechanism reliant on full-image, deep feature representations, i.e., global averaging of the last feature map.”
From Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detection (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“As can be seen, inference time for joint image- and pixel-level anomaly detection of PatchCore -100% (without subsampling) are lower than SPADE [10] but with higher performance.”
From Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detection (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“As can be seen, inference time for joint image- and pixel-level anomaly detection of PatchCore -100% (without subsampling) are lower than SPADE [10] but with higher performance.”
From Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detection (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Empirically and similar to [10] and [14], we found aggregation of multiple feature hierarchies to offer some benefit.”
From Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detection (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“More global context can also be achieved by moving down the network hierarchy (see e.g. [10, 14]), however at the cost of reduced resolution and heavier ImageNet class bias (§3.1).”
From Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detection (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Semantic pyramid anomaly detection (SPADE) [63] is inspired by KNN and utilizes correspondences based on a multi-resolution feature pyramid to obtain pixel-level anomaly segmentation results.”
From Deep Industrial Image Anomaly Detection: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [63]
In the citing paper
“PatchCore [68] , SPADE [63] and PaDim [73] conduct the ablation study on 16 normal training samples.”
From Deep Industrial Image Anomaly Detection: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [63]
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale
Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., Gelly, S., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.11929 · Cited by 47,472
Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Dollar, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Hariharan, B., & Belongie, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.106 · Cited by 30,939
Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization
Selvaraju, R. R., Cogswell, M., Das, A., Vedantam, R., Parikh, D., & Batra, D. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.74 · Cited by 24,513
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
GAN(Generative Adversarial Nets)
淳司, 柴. (2017) · Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics · doi:10.3156/jsoft.29.5_177_2 · Cited by 20,507
Algorithm AS 136: A K-Means Clustering Algorithm
Hartigan, J. A., & Wong, M. A. (1979) · Applied Statistics · doi:10.2307/2346830 · Cited by 14,523
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1541880.1541882 · Cited by 11,687
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 374
Generating and Reweighting Dense Contrastive Patterns for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection
Dai, S., Wu, Y., Li, X., & Xue, X. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i2.27910 · Cited by 27
A Semantic-Enhanced Method Based On Deep SVDD for Pixel-Wise Anomaly Detection
Hu, C., Chen, K., & Shao, H. (2021) · 2021 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) · doi:10.1109/icme51207.2021.9428370 · Cited by 24
Anomaly Detection of Metro Station Tracks Based on Sequential Updatable Anomaly Detection Framework
Zheng, Z., Liu, W., Liu, R., Wang, L., Mao, L., Qiu, Q., & Ling, G. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2022.3181452 · Cited by 26
Multi-Category Decomposition Editing Network for the Accurate Visual Inspection of Texture Defects
Yang, H. S., Zhu, H., Li, J., Chen, J., & Yin, Z. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/tase.2023.3295872 · Cited by 24
Low-Shot Unsupervised Visual Anomaly Detection via Sparse Feature Representation
Zhang, F., Zhu, H., Cen, Y., Kan, S., Zhang, L., Vadakkepat, P., & Lee, T. H. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2024.3420818 · Cited by 24
Anomaly Composition and Decomposition Network for Accurate Visual Inspection of Texture Defects
Song, K., Yang, H. S., & Yin, Z. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2022.3196133 · Cited by 23
Zhao, Q., Wang, Y., Wang, B., Lin, J., Yan, S., Song, W., Liotta, A., Yu, J., Gao, S., & Zhang, W. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2023.3341259 · Cited by 25
PEDENet: Image anomaly localization via patch embedding and density estimation
Zhang, K., Wang, B., & Kuo, C.-C. J. (2022) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2021.11.030 · Cited by 22
Heckler, L., König, R., & Bergmann, P. (2023) · IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw59228.2023.00293 · Cited by 26
Unsupervised anomaly detection and localization with one model for all category
Tan, P., & Wong, W. K. (2024) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2024.111533 · Cited by 22
A Semantic Information Decomposition Network for Accurate Segmentation of Texture Defects
Yang, H. S., Hu, J., Yin, Z., & Wang, Z. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2022.3217751 · Cited by 21
Attention-Conditioned Augmentations for Self-Supervised Anomaly Detection and Localization
Bozorgtabar, B., & Mahapatra, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i12.26720 · Cited by 23
Reconstruction Student with Attention for Student-Teacher Pyramid MatchingPreprint
Yamada, S., & Hotta, K. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.15376 · Cited by 44
Prototypical Learning Guided Context-Aware Segmentation Network for Few-Shot Anomaly Detection
Jiang, Y., Cao, Y., & Shen, W. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2024.3463495 · Cited by 21
Semi-Supervised Bolt Anomaly Detection Based on Local Feature Reconstruction
Peng, Y., Liu, C.-W., Yan, Y., Ma, N., Wang, D., Liu, C., & Chen, Q. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2023.3278293 · Cited by 20
MSAttnFlow: Normalizing flow for unsupervised anomaly detection with multi-scale attention
Hu, Z., Zeng, X., Li, Y., Yin, Z., Meng, E., Wei, Z., Zhu, L., & Wang, Z. (2024) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2024.111220 · Cited by 19
Shangguan, W., Wu, H., Niu, Y., Yin, H., Yu, J., Chen, B., & Huang, B. (2025) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2025.103240 · Cited by 20
ADPS: Asymmetric Distillation Postsegmentation for Image Anomaly Detection
Xing, P., Tang, H., Tang, J., & Li, Z. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2024.3390806 · Cited by 20
What Makes a Good Data Augmentation for Few-Shot Unsupervised Image Anomaly Detection?
Zhang, L., Zhang, S., Xie, G., Liu, J., Yan, H., Wang, J., Zheng, F., & Jin, Y. (2023) · IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw59228.2023.00457 · Cited by 19
Catenary Insulator Defect Detection: A Dataset and an Unsupervised Baseline
Zhang, T., Zhong, S., Xu, W., Yan, L., & Zou, X. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2024.3390695 · Cited by 18
Few-shot online anomaly detection and segmentation
Wei, S., Wei, X., Ma, Z., Dong, S., Zhang, S., & Gong, Y. (2024) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2024.112168 · Cited by 18
Produce Once, Utilize Twice for Anomaly Detection
Wang, S., Li, Q., Luo, H., Lv, C., & Zhang, Z. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2024.3420775 · Cited by 18
Memory Linked Anomaly Metric Learning of Thermography Rail Defects Detection System
Zhang, X., Gao, B., Shi, Y., Woo, W. L., & Li, H. (2021) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2021.3112698 · Cited by 17
ALGAN: Anomaly Detection by Generating Pseudo Anomalous Data via Latent Variables
Murase, H., & Fukumizu, K. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3169594 · Cited by 19
Defect Detection Method Based on Knowledge Distillation
Zhou, Q., Wang, H., Tang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3252910 · Cited by 18
Graph-Based Active Learning With Uncertainty and Representativeness for Industrial Anomaly Detection
Xiao, K., Cao, J., Zeng, Z., & Ling, B. W. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2023.3279422 · Cited by 18
Yao, Y., Dong, A., Liu, Z., Jiang, Y., Guo, Z., Cheng, J., Guan, Q., & Luo, P. (2023) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2023.104575 · Cited by 17
Far Away in the Deep Space: Dense Nearest-Neighbor-Based Out-of-Distribution Detection
Galesso, S., Argus, M. J., & Brox, T. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops · doi:10.1109/iccvw60793.2023.00482 · Cited by 19
Y-GAN: Learning dual data representations for anomaly detection in images
Ivanovska, M., & Štruc, V. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123410 · Cited by 22
Zuo, Z., Wu, Z., Chen, B., & Zhong, X. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp48485.2024.10446766 · Cited by 19
Long-Tailed Anomaly Detection with Learnable Class Names
Ho, C.-H., Peng, K., & Vasconcelos, N. M. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01182 · Cited by 21
PUAD: Frustratingly Simple Method for Robust Anomaly Detection
Sugawara, S., & Imamura, R. (2024) · Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip51287.2024.10647438 · Cited by 20
RDAD: A reconstructive and discriminative anomaly detection model based on transformer
Xie, X., Huang, Y., Ning, W., Wu, D., Li, Z., & Yang, H. (2022) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/int.22974 · Cited by 19
Transfer Learning Gaussian Anomaly Detection by Fine-tuning Representations
Rippel, O., Chavan, A., Lei, C., & Merhof, D. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Image Processing and Vision Engineering · doi:10.5220/0011063900003209 · Cited by 17
Spatial Contrastive Learning for Anomaly Detection and Localization
Kim, D.-H., Jeong, D., Kim, H., Chong, K., Kim, S., & Cho, H. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3149130 · Cited by 16
MemFormer: A memory based unified model for anomaly detection on metro railway tracks
Liu, R., Liu, W., Duan, M., Xie, W., Dai, Y., & Liao, X. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121509 · Cited by 17
Visual Anomaly Detection for Images: A SurveyPreprint
Yang, J., Xu, R., Qi, Z., & Shi, Y. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.13157 · Cited by 16
Discriminative Feature Learning Framework With Gradient Preference for Anomaly Detection
Xu, M., Zhou, X., Gao, X., He, W., & Niu, S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2022.3228007 · Cited by 17
Adaptive visual detection of industrial product defects
Zhang, H., Wang, D., Chen, Z., & Pan, R. (2023) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.1264 · Cited by 15
Yang, H., Zhu, Z., Lin, C., Hui, W., Wang, S., & Zhao, Y. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2023.3273681 · Cited by 15
ECF-STPM: A Robust Crack Detection Method for Railway Catenary Components
Zhang, Y., Zhong, J., Liu, Z., & Han, Z. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2023.3307181 · Cited by 16
Yao, H., Luo, W., Yu, W., Zhang, X., Qiang, Z., Luo, D., & Shi, H. (2024) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2024.102613 · Cited by 15
Wahid, J. A., Ayoub, M., Xu, M., Jiang, X., Shi, L., & Hussain, S. (2024) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128845 · Cited by 17
ToCoAD: Two-Stage Contrastive Learning for Industrial Anomaly Detection
Liang, Y., Hu, Z., Huang, J., Di, D., Su, A., & Fan, L. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2025.3545987 · Cited by 21
FUN-AD: Fully Unsupervised Learning for Anomaly Detection with Noisy Training Data
Im, J., Son, Y., & Hong, J. H. (2025) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv61041.2025.00915 · Cited by 15
Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with an Enhanced Teacher for Student-Teacher Feature Pyramid Matching
Zolfaghari, M., & Sajedi, H. (2022) · International Computer Conference, Computer Society of Iran (CSICC) · doi:10.1109/csicc55295.2022.9780522 · Cited by 15
Truong, A. M., & Luong, H. Q. (2024) · Current Research in Food Science · doi:10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100758 · Cited by 14
Ullah, W., Khan, S. U., Kim, M. J., Hussain, A., Munsif, M., Lee, M. Y., Seo, D., & Baik, S. W. (2024) · Journal of Computational Design and Engineering · doi:10.1093/jcde/qwae019 · Cited by 14
Context-aware feature reconstruction for class-incremental anomaly detection and localization
Pang, J., & Li, C. (2024) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106788 · Cited by 17
Anomaly Detection In Retinal Images Using Multi-Scale Deep Feature Sparse Coding
Das, S. D., Dutta, S., Shah, N. A., Mahapatra, D., & Ge, Z. (2022) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi52829.2022.9761713 · Cited by 14
Schlüter, H. M., Tan, J., Hou, B., & Kainz, B. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 14
A novel micro-defect classification system based on attention enhancement
Lin, S. S., He, Z., & Sun, L. (2023) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-022-02064-2 · Cited by 13
Huang, Y., Liu, G., Luo, Y., & Yang, G. (2023) · Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip49359.2023.10222528 · Cited by 13
Yao, H., Luo, W., Zhang, W., Zhang, X., Qiang, Z., & Luo, D. (2024) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109235 · Cited by 19
SplatPose & Detect: Pose-Agnostic 3D Anomaly Detection
Kruse, M., Rudolph, M., Woiwode, D., & Rosenhahn, B. (2024) · IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw63382.2024.00399 · Cited by 19
Shi, Y., Gao, B., Yang, G. H., Li, H., & Woo, W. L. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2025.3551852 · Cited by 15
UniFormaly: Towards task-agnostic unified framework for visual anomaly detection
Lee, Y., Lim, H., Jang, S., & Yoon, H. (2025) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2025.111820 · Cited by 13
Semi-supervised pipeline anomaly detection algorithm based on memory items and metric learning
Yan, B., Zheng, J., Li, R., Fu, K., Chen, P., Jia, G., Shi, Y., Lv, J., & Gao, B. (2023) · Nondestructive Testing And Evaluation · doi:10.1080/10589759.2023.2169285 · Cited by 12
Unsupervised anomaly detection in images using attentional normalizing flows
Wu, X., Mao, G., & Xing, S. (2023) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107369 · Cited by 12
Local and Global Information in Obstacle Detection on Railway Tracks
Brucker, M., Cramariuc, A., von Einem, C., Siegwart, R., & Cadena, C. (2023) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros55552.2023.10342174 · Cited by 15
3-D Vision and Intelligent Online Inspection in SMT Microelectronic Packaging: A Review
Li, T., Wang, S., Luo, Y., Wan, J., Luo, Z., & Chen, M. (2024) · IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/jestie.2024.3365030 · Cited by 12
Liu, M., Jiao, Y., Lü, J., & Chen, H. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2024.3406792 · Cited by 12
Advancing unsupervised anomaly detection with normalizing flow and multi-scale ensemble learning
Campos-Romero, M., Carranza-García, M., & Riquelme, J. C. (2024) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109088 · Cited by 12
A Wavelet-Based Memory Autoencoder for Noncontact Fingerprint Presentation Attack Detection
Liu, Y., Yu, H., Fang, H., Li, Z., Chen, P., & Liang, R. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2024.3463957 · Cited by 14
AnomalyHop: An SSL-based Image Anomaly Localization Method
Zhang, K., Wang, B., Wang, W., Sohrab, F., Gabbouj, M., & Kuo, C. ‐. J. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP) · doi:10.1109/vcip53242.2021.9675385 · Cited by 12
Unified Model Based on Reinforced Feature Reconstruction for Metro Track Anomaly Detection
Duan, M., Mao, L., Liu, R., Liu, W., & Liu, Z. (2024) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2023.3348118 · Cited by 13
k-NNN: Nearest Neighbors of Neighbors for Anomaly Detection
Nizan, O., & Tal, A. (2024) · IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (WACVW) · doi:10.1109/wacvw60836.2024.00110 · Cited by 14
Unsupervised Homography Estimation With Pixel-Level SVDD
Zhou, Z., Zhu, Q. X., Feng, M., Wang, Y., Luo, J., Miao, Z., Chen, L., & Mo, Y. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2024.3394899 · Cited by 11
An, S., Kim, J., Kim, S., Chikontwe, P., Jung, J., Jeon, H., & Park, S. H. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124890 · Cited by 11
Kohler, M., Mitsios, D., & Endisch, C. (2024) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2024.12.005 · Cited by 12
Tao, X., Yan, S., Gong, X., & Adak, C. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2022.3227142 · Cited by 13
MTHM: Self-Supervised Multitask Anomaly Detection With Hard Example Mining
Zhang, C., Wang, Y., & Tan, W. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2023.3276529 · Cited by 11
High-Fidelity Zero-Shot Texture Anomaly Localization Using Feature Correspondence Analysis
Ardelean, A.-T., & Weyrich, T. (2024) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv57701.2024.00117 · Cited by 11
Vieira-e-Silva, A. L. B., Simões, F., Kowerko, D., Schlosser, T., Battisti, F., & Teichrieb, V. (2024) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv57701.2024.00806 · Cited by 10
Guo, N., Lin, C., Yan, H., Zang, J., & Xiong, M. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2024.3370747 · Cited by 10
FEGAN: A Feature Extraction Based Approach for GAN Anomaly Detection and Localization
Fan, F., Zhang, L., & Dai, Y. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3406438 · Cited by 11
WARM: A wavelet adaptive restoration module for surface anomaly detection
Qiao, Z., Lin, M., Lin, J., & Ding, D. (2024) · Measurement · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2024.114689 · Cited by 8
Zhou, J., & Wu, Y. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2024.3408034 · Cited by 9
Inspection of cracking in stamping parts surfaces using anomaly detection
Dong, X., Zhang, C., Wang, D., Guo, Q., Deng, X., & Li, C. (2025) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110006 · Cited by 10
NFCF: Industrial Surface Anomaly Detection with Normalizing Flow Cross-Fitting Network
Yang, W., Song, K., Wang, Y., Wei, X., Tong, L., Chen, S., & Yan, Y. (2023) · Optics and Lasers in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.optlaseng.2023.107655 · Cited by 9
Nakano, T., Koresawa, H., & Narahara, H. (2023) · Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design Systems and Manufacturing · doi:10.1299/jamdsm.2023jamdsm0034 · Cited by 9
TUT: Template-Augmented U-Net Transformer for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection
Chen, Z., Bai, C., Zhu, Y., & Lu, X. (2024) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2024.3372783 · Cited by 9
Fault Diagnosis in Power Line Inspection Using Normalized Multihierarchy Embedding Matching
Liu, X., Miao, X., Jiang, H., Chen, J., & Chen, Z. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2023.3238696 · Cited by 9
Defect Detection of Apples using PatchCore
Hattori, K., Izumi, T., & Meng, L. (2023) · International Conference on Advanced Mechatronic Systems · doi:10.1109/icamechs59878.2023.10272937 · Cited by 9
Adaptive Context-Aware Distillation for Industrial Image Anomaly Detection
He, Y. J., Yang, H. S., & Yin, Z. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2023.3336758 · Cited by 8
Industrial image anomaly detection based on multi Gaussian discriminant model and robust core set
Wei, R., Li, Z., Geng, L., Wuken, M., & Liu, Y. (2024) · Measurement Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/1361-6501/ad6c76 · Cited by 12
Reverse Distillation for Continuous Anomaly Detection
Yang, A., Xu, X., Wu, Y., & Liu, H. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2024.3440374 · Cited by 8
Dual-Branch Knowledge Distillation via Residual Features Aggregation Module for Anomaly Segmentation
Zhou, Y., Huang, Z., Zeng, D., Qu, Y., & Wu, Z. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2024.3507036 · Cited by 8
DC-AD: A Divide-and-Conquer Method for Few-Shot Anomaly Detection
Zhang, J., Yang, Z., & Song, Y. (2025) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2025.111360 · Cited by 8
Automatic Unsupervised Fabric Defect Detection Based on Self-Feature Comparison
Peng, Z., Gong, X., Wei, B., Xu, X., & Meng, S. (2021) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics10212652 · Cited by 9
Enhancing Anomaly Detection Performance and Acceleration
Saiku, R., Sato, J., Yamada, T., & Ito, K. (2022) · IEEJ Journal of Industry Applications · doi:10.1541/ieejjia.21013871 · Cited by 8
Deep Feature Contrasting for Industrial Image Anomaly Segmentation
Wan, Q., Cao, Y., Gao, L., Li, X., & Gao, Y. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2023.3348901 · Cited by 9
Detecting anomalous proteins using deep representations
Michael-Pitschaze, T., Cohen, N., Ofer, D., Hoshen, Y., & Linial, M. (2024) · NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/nargab/lqae021 · Cited by 11
Self-citationA Multi-Scale A Contrario method for Unsupervised Image Anomaly Detection
Tailanian, M., Muse, P., & Pardo, A. (2021) · 2021 20th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA) · doi:10.1109/icmla52953.2021.00035 · Cited by 10
FocusCLIP: Focusing on Anomaly Regions by Visual-Text Discrepancies
Zhao, Y., Sun, J., Zhang, L., & Lu, H. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2024.3524784 · Cited by 8
Few-Shot Anomaly Detection via Personalization
Kwak, S., Jeong, J., Lee, H., Kim, W., Seo, D., Yun, W., Lee, W. J., & Shin, J. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3355021 · Cited by 7
Cross-Attention Regression Flow for Defect Detection
Liu, B., Guo, T., Luo, B., Cui, Z., & Yang, J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2024.3457236 · Cited by 7
Data Invariants to Understand Unsupervised Out-of-Distribution Detection
Doorenbos, L., Sznitman, R., & Márquez-Neila, P. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-19821-2_8 · Cited by 7
Application research of plant leaf pests and diseases base on unsupervised learning
Pei, M., Kong, M., Fu, M., Zhou, X., Li, Z., & Xu, J. (2022) · 2022 3rd International Conference on Computer Vision, Image and Deep Learning & International Conference on Computer Engineering and Applications (CVIDL & ICCEA) · doi:10.1109/cvidliccea56201.2022.9824321 · Cited by 7
Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Self-Training and Knowledge Distillation
Liu, H., Li, K., Li, X., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip46576.2022.9897777 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohen, N., & Hoshen, Y.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2005.02357
- OpenAlex
- W3023868590
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 128 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 34
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
- Keywords
- anomaly localization, anomaly segmentation, feature matching, unsupervised anomaly detection, semantic segmentation, Spades
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review