CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 6Quantum and Classical ElectrodynamicsRelativity and Gravitational TheoryQuantum Mechanics and Applications

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 66 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Zitterbewegung and the Charge of an Electron

Open access
Davis, Basil S.·2020·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2006.16003arXiv 2006.16003
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Dirac's Relativistic Wave Equation implies a measured electron velocity of $\pm c$ in any direction, in contradiction to Special Relativity and observation. It is shown in this article that this anomalous electron velocity reveals an internal structure of the electron whereby the mass and the charge of the electron cannot be described by the same position operator. The measured velocity of electron mass is always less than $c$ in any direction but charge can be displaced at the speed of light. This speed is realizable only when the electron is in a state that is a superposition of positive and negative energy states, also known as a zitterbewegung state. It is shown that in zitterbewegung it is the charge and not the mass that undergoes rapid spatial oscillation, and that there are measurable consequences of this charge zitterbewegung. Zitterbewegung of charge also occurs in an entangled electron-positron pair created by a strong electric field.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper argues that Dirac’s ±c velocity eigenvalue is not the velocity of electron mass but of electron charge, so zitterbewegung is a rapid spatial oscillation of charge at light speed. It reinterprets an entangled electron-positron pair-creation study as confirming charge zitterbewegung, with amplitude of order the Compton wavelength and inferred leap speed ~2.8×10^8 m/s.

Key findings

  • Velocity eigenstates of the Dirac electron are superpositions of positive- and negative-energy states; for a definite-energy electron the expected velocity magnitude is less than c, so the eigenvalues ±c are “physically unrealizable” for mass motion.
  • Zitterbewegung is identified as displacement of electron charge, not mass: the charge jumps at speed c across a separation of order the Compton wavelength, with zitterbewegung frequency of order 2mc²/ħ = 2×10²¹ sec⁻¹.
  • Self-interaction of the charge via a Liénard-Wiechert potential increases the electron energy by αmc², giving an electromagnetic mass m(1+α), stated to agree with Schwinger’s mechanical-to-electromagnetic mass relation.
  • Reanalysis of Krekora, Su, and Grobe’s entangled electron-positron pair model finds satellite separation ~0.05 a.u. = 2.6×10⁻¹² m, close to the Compton wavelength 2.4×10⁻¹² m, and infers a leap speed of 2.8×10⁸ m/s from 0.10 a.u. = 5.3×10⁻¹² m over 1.9×10⁻²⁰ s.

Methods

  • Theoretical analysis of the Dirac Hamiltonian, velocity operator cα, time-dependent position operator, Foldy-Wouthuysen position operator, and the hermitian operator x†ᵢxᵢ; the velocity operator is identified with the time derivative of the charge position operator.
  • Reinterpretation of Krekora, Su, and Grobe’s analytic and numerical study of an entangled electron-positron pair created by a potential V(x,t)=V[tanh(x/W)+1]/2 turned on at t=0, using their wave functions and density plots.
  • No new experimental data are presented; the paper cites the Darwin term and prior theoretical/numerical results as evidence for charge zitterbewegung.

Limitations

  • The paper states that true zitterbewegung has a very high frequency, of order 2×10²¹ sec⁻¹, making direct observation “virtually impossible,” so investigations are primarily theoretical.
  • The paper states that direct experimental verification of electron-positron pair production by a strong electric field is not yet available.
  • The paper notes that the continuously varying position operator is not hermitian and does not represent an observable or a continuous displacement of charge, so there is no charge acceleration; the pair-creation confirmation relies on reinterpreting a prior model rather than a new measurement.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2006.16003

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 66 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation

    Integrating the velocity operator as a function of time gives the time-dependent position operator x(t) = a + c^2 H^-1 pt + i c^2 (α - cH^-1 p)H^-1 e^{-2iHt/ħ}.

    “Upon integrating the velocity operator as a function of time one obtains the timedependent position operator [1,15,22,24,29,30]:”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 6 sources checked
    • cites [1]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [15]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [22]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [24]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [29]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [30]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingreasoning

    The term c^2 H^-1 pt represents the classical displacement of the electron with velocity v = c^2 p/E.

    “c 2 H -1 pt represents the “classical” displacement of the electron with velocity v = c 2 p E .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    The part of the zitterbewegung term that contains α goes to zero in the non-relativistic limit as c→∞.

    “The part of this term that contains α goes to zero in the non-relativistic limit as c → ∞.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    Permitting ∇•E = ρ/ε0 for the electron charge undergoing zitterbewegung and taking the divergence of both sides of Eq (15) yields ∇2ρ = 1/c2 ∂2ρ/∂t2.

    “So, permitting ∇ • E = ρ/ 0 (for the electron charge undergoing zitterbewegung) and taking the divergence of both sides of Eq (15) we obtain ∇ 2 ρ = 1 c 2 ∂ 2 ρ ∂t 2 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The electron charge undergoing zitterbewegung can be treated as a source term in Maxwell's equations with ∇•E = ρ/ε0.
    • Rests on an assumption: In a quantum description, the vacuum condition ∇•E = 0 everywhere is replaced by Φ|∇•E|Φ = 0 without demanding ∇•E = 0.
  • Findingcitation

    The operator -ev ≡ -ecα can be identified as the charge current operator, where e is the magnitude of the negative electron charge.

    “We could therefore identify -ev ≡ -ecα as the charge current operator [48], where e is the magnitude of the negative electron charge.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [48]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • Rests on an assumption: The electron charge does not exhibit any variation with speed.
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 28
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 18

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    Dirac's relativistic wave equation implies a measured electron velocity of ±c in any direction, in contradiction to Special Relativity and observation.

    “Dirac's Relativistic Wave Equation implies a measured electron velocity of ±c in any direction, in contradiction to Special Relativity and observation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingreasoning

    The hermitian operator x†_i x_i commutes with both H and α_i and has eigenvalue ħ^2 c^2/(4E^2), where E or -E is the energy of the electron.

    “Thus x † i x i commutes with both H and α i , and has eigenvalue 2 c 2 /(4E 2 ) where E (or -E) is the energy of the electron.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    The remaining quantum term in the position operator vanishes as ħ→0 and oscillates rapidly with time according to e^{-2iHt/ħ}; this is the zitterbewegung term.

    “The remaining“quantum” term in which appears as an explicit factor vanishes as → 0, and oscillates rapidly with time according to e -2iHt/ .This is the zitterbewegung term.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    The charge current operator commutes with the velocity operator, indicating that electron charge could be observed traveling at speed c.

    “This operator commutes with the velocity operator, thereby indicating that electron charge could be observed traveling at speed c.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    The position operators x(t), one for each component of x, are not hermitian and therefore do not represent observables.

    “Since these position operators (one for each component of x) are not hermitian, they do not represent observables, an important fact that has appears to have been overlooked by many [1,10,17,24,29].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [1]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [10]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [17]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [24]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [29]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The non-vanishing wave functions include positive energy, negative energy, coupling between particles with opposite energy, and states obtained by switching the superscripts.

    “The non-vanishing wave functions include positive energy (φ 1,2 0 ), negative energy (φ 3,4 0 ), as well as coupling between particles with opposite energy (φ 1,4 0 and φ 2,3 0 ), and the states obtained by switching the superscripts (electron and positron).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    The paper's discussion in Sec II D showed that the scanning should take place at the speed of light.

    “our discussion in Sec II D showed that the scanning should take place at the speed of light.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingown data

    An examination of the lowest diagram in Figure 1 shows a clear spatial gap between the main body and the two satellites.

    “An examination of the lowest diagram in Figure 1 shows a clear spatial gap between the main body and the two “satellites,””
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingown data

    In Sec II D the paper showed that the spatial derivative of the electric potential requires that a point charge should scan the electric field through zitterbewegung.

    “In Sec II D we showed that the spatial derivative of the electric potential requires that a point charge should scan the electric field through zitterbewegung.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    The speed of the electron leaping between the satellites in the Study is 2.8 × 10^8 m/s, which is the speed of light within the limits of accuracy.

    “Since the time is 8 × 10 -4 a.u.= 1.9 × 10 -20 s, and the spatial separation is of the order of 0.10 a.u.= 5.3 × 10 -12 m, the speed of the electron comes to 2.8 × 10 8 m/s, which is the speed of light within the limits of accuracy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    In the Study the amplitude, the separation between the main body and each satellite, is of the order of 0.05 a.u. = 2.6 × 10^-12 m, which is of the order of the Compton wavelength (2.4 × 10^-12 m).

    “In the Study the amplitude -which is the separation between the main body and each satellite -is of the order of 0.05 a.u.= 2.6 × 10 -12 m, which is of the order of the Compton wavelength (2.4 × 10 -12 m).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The equations suggest an electron jumping back and forth across a separation of the order of ħ/mc at the speed c, except that in this interpretation it is the charge alone that makes this motion, not the mass.

    “These equations suggest an electron jumping back and forth across a separation of the order of /mc at the speed c ( dx dt = cα), except that in our interpretation it is the charge alone that makes this motion, not the mass.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    True zitterbewegung is the rapid oscillation of the electron energy between positive and negative values, accompanied by some sort of rapid spatial oscillation at the speed c.

    “True zitterbewegung is the rapid oscillation of the electron energy between positive and negative values, accompanied by some sort of rapid spatial oscillation at the speed c.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The charge of the real electron neutralizes the charge of the virtual positron, and reappears at a spatially displaced position as the charge of the former virtual electron.

    “The charge of the real electron neutralizes the charge of the virtual positron, and reappears at a spatially displaced position as the charge of the former virtual electron.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Zitterbewegung as a translatory motion is to be identified with the motion of the electron charge, quite distinct from any motion of the mass.

    “We will next show that zitterbewegung as a translatory motion is to be identified with the motion of the electron charge, quite distinct from any motion of the mass.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    A free electron represented by a plane wave that is initially in a positive or negative energy state remains in that energy state, but in the presence of an electromagnetic field the wave function becomes a wave packet containing both positive and negative energy states.

    “A free electron -represented by a plane wave -that is initially in a state of positive (negative) energy, remains in a positive (negative) energy state, but in the presence of an electromagnetic field the wave function becomes a wave packet containing both positive and negative energy states [4].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    Zitterbewegung is the difference between the instantaneous velocity and the average velocity (= p/μ where μ is the relativistic mass).

    “So zitterbewegung is the difference between the “instantaneous velocity” and the “average velocity (= p/µ where µ is the relativistic mass)” [5].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A repetition of the process could bring the electron charge back to the original position, or to a different position, the directions being determined randomly.

    “A repetition of the process could bring the electron charge back to the original position, or to a different position, the directions being determined randomly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    Zitterbewegung of charge also occurs in an entangled electron-positron pair created by a strong electric field.

    “Zitterbewegung of charge also occurs in an entangled electron-positron pair created by a strong electric field.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    In the field theoretical model, the electron and positron are not created at the identical spatial point; in a weak or zero electric field there is a distance of the order of the Compton wavelength between these particles, and the distance decreases with the strength of the field.

    “Krekora et al have shown that the electron and the positron are not created at the identical spatial point, but that in a weak or zero electric field there is a distance of the order of the Compton wavelength between these particles.(The distance decreases with the strength of the field.)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If an electron is measured having definite energy, either positive or negative, it cannot be simultaneously observed traveling at the speed of light, and thus Special Relativity is not violated.

    “We have shown above that if an electron is measured having definite energy (either positive or negative), it cannot be simultaneously observed traveling at the speed of light, and thus Special Relativity is not violated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The total energy of the electron is mc^2(1+α) and the electromagnetic mass becomes m(1+α).

    “The total energy of the electron is therefore mc 2 (1 + α) and the electromagnetic mass becomes m(1 + α).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Krekora, Su and Grobe have shown that zitterbewegung cannot occur apart from the creation and annihilation of virtual electron-positron pairs in the vacuum field, a result corroborated by Wang and Xiong.

    “Krekora, Su and Grobe have shown that zitterbewegung cannot occur apart from the creation and annihilation of virtual electron-positron pairs in the vacuum field [18], a result corroborated by Wang and Xiong [32].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [18]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [32]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The Aharonov-Bohm effect has moved the scalar and vector fields from the category of mathematical fictions to the category of physical ontology.

    “So the Aharonov-Bohm effect has moved “the scalar and vector fields from the category of mathematical fictions to the category of physical ontology” [63]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [63]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    In Maxwellian electrodynamics an electric field propagates at speed c in the absence of charges.

    “In Maxwellian electrodynamics an electric field propagates at speed c in the absence of charges:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The claim that zitterbewegung cannot be observable because the Foldy-Wouthuysen transform eliminates it is true only if zitterbewegung is understood as a motion of electron mass, which it is not.

    “We have shown that this would be true only if zitterbewegung is understood as a motion of electron mass, which it is not.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Charge oscillates at the speed c when the electron is in a zitterbewegung state, without an accompanying mechanical motion of the mass.

    “Thus, this article will prove that charge oscillates at the speed c when the electron is in a zitterbewegung state, without an accompanying mechanical motion of the mass.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Zitterbewegung is the rapid spatial oscillation of electron charge, even as the energy of the electron fluctuates rapidly between positive and negative values.

    “And so we propose that zitterbewegung is the rapid spatial oscillation of electron charge, even as the energy of the electron fluctuates rapidly between positive and negative values.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Since the continuously varying position operator of Eq (10) is not hermitian, it does not represent a continuous displacement of the charge, and hence there is no charge acceleration.

    “And since the continuously varying position operator of Eq (10) is not hermitian, it does not represent a continuous displacement of the charge, and hence there is no charge acceleration.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The electron interacts with the vacuum and undergoes zitterbewegung.

    “The electron interacts with the vacuum and undergoes zitterbewegung.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    For the supercritical field produced in the limit W → 0, the operator H^2 → ∞ and the position operator x†x → 0 according to Eq (12).

    “For the case of the supercritical field produced in the limit W → 0 in the potential V (x, t) = V [tanh(x/W ) + 1]/2, the operator H 2 → ∞ and so our position operator x † x → 0 according to Eq (12).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationcitation

    There is another position term containing momentum that is an oscillatory term of frequency 2H/ħ, which appears to be a zitterbewegung motion of the electron mass in the direction of momentum, called longitudinal zitterbewegung.

    “This is an oscillatory term of frequency 2H/ .This appears to be a zitterbewegung motion of the electron mass, in the direction of the momentum, which could be called “longitudinal zitterbewegung” [32].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [32]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The motion of an object having charge q and mass m in an electromagnetic and a gravitational field can be described by an equation such as Eq (21).

    “The motion of an object having charge q and mass m in an electromagnetic and a gravitational field can be described by an equation such as [68]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [68]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationreasoning

    By analogy, a point mass must scan the gravitational field via a sort of zitterbewegung in order to experience a gravitational force.

    “So, by analogy, a point mass must scan the gravitational field via a sort of zitterbewegung in order to experience a gravitational force.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A study of the motion of the mass would have to include gravity as well, since by the Principle of Equivalence the inertial mass of an object is equal to its gravitational mass.

    “A study of the motion of the mass would have to include gravity as well, since by the Principle of Equivalence the inertial mass of an object is equal to its gravitational mass.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: By the Principle of Equivalence, the inertial mass of an object is equal to its gravitational mass.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The velocity eigenstates are superpositions of two mutually orthogonal energy eigenstates and therefore not eigenstates of the Hamiltonian of Eq(1).

    “Hence the velocity eigenstates are superpositions of two mutually orthogonal energy eigenstates and therefore not eigenstates of the Hamiltonian of Eq(1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Electron-positron pair production by the application of a strong electric field to the vacuum is theoretically possible.

    “Electron-positron pair production by the application of a strong electric field to the vacuum is theoretically possible”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [65]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Simultaneity implies a light-like separation, which requires a teleportation of charge at the speed of light between the points.

    “Simultaneity implies a light-like separation, which requires a teleportation of charge at the speed of light between the points.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Any electron or positron in an electromagnetic field is in a superposition of states including zitterbewegung states.

    “This is con-sistent with the well-known result that any electron (or positron) in an electromagnetic field is in a superposition of states including zitterbewegung states [4].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Wang, Xiong and Qiu have developed a theory of photonic zitterbewegung and have put forth the hypothesis that electron zitterbewegung is connected to the electromagnetic field, while photonic zitterbewegung is connected to the gravitational field.

    “Wang, Xiong and Qiu [69] have developed a theory of photonic zitterbewegung and have put forth the hypothesis that whereas electron zitterbewegung is connected to the electromagnetic field, photonic zitterbewegung is connected to the gravitational field.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [69]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Direct experimental verification of electron-positron pair production by a strong electric field is not yet available.

    “even if direct experimental verification of such a process is not yet available [65].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [65]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Puthoff developed the theory put forth by Sakharov, who suggested that the rest mass energy of a particle (called a parton) arises from the mechanical energy of its zitterbewegung motion.

    “Puthoff [66] has developed the theory put forth by Sakharov [67], who suggested that the rest mass energy of a particle (called a parton) arises from the mechanical energy of its zitterbewegung motion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [66]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [67]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

42 of 42

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The electron charge does not exhibit any variation with speed.

    “We uphold the validity of this identification by pointing out that, unlike the electron mass, the electron charge does not exhibit any variation with speed.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The zitterbewegung electron is separated from its twin by a light-like interval.

    “Since the zitterbewegung electron is separated from its “twin” by a light-like interval, we could picture “one” electron at r at time t experiencing the potential of the “other” electron”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The electron charge undergoing zitterbewegung can be treated as a source term in Maxwell's equations with ∇•E = ρ/ε0.

    “So, permitting ∇ • E = ρ/ 0 (for the electron charge undergoing zitterbewegung) and taking the divergence of both sides of Eq (15) we obtain”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In a quantum description, the vacuum condition ∇•E = 0 everywhere is replaced by Φ|∇•E|Φ = 0 without demanding ∇•E = 0.

    “But in a quantum description this requirement is replaced by Φ|∇ • E|Φ = 0 without demanding that ∇ • E = 0.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The force acting on a charge in a potential φ created by static charges equals -q∇φ.

    “The force acting on a charge in a potential φ created by static charges equals -q∇φ”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Space-like separations are forbidden by Special Relativity.

    “Space-like separations are forbidden by Special Relativity.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A gaussian position wave function ψ(x) implies that p_x = 0.

    “A gaussian position wave function ψ(x) implies that p x = 0.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    By the Principle of Equivalence, the inertial mass of an object is equal to its gravitational mass.

    “since by the Principle of Equivalence the inertial mass of an object is equal to its gravitational mass.”
8 of 8

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Squared-distance eigenvalue is identified as a length

    Minor

    The operator is described as measuring the square of a distance, but later its eigenvalue is identified with the length itself rather than the squared length.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. J. D. Bjorken and S. D. Drell, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964)
  2. E. Schrödinger, Sitzber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Physik-Math. 24, 418 (1930)
  3. P. Krekora, Q. Su and R. Grobe, Relativistic electron localization and the lack of Zitterbewe- gung. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 043004 (2004)
  4. P. W. Milonni, The Quantum Vacuum (Academic Press, San Diego, 1994)
  5. T. Welton, Some observable effects of the quantum-mechanical effects of the electromagnetic field, Phys. Rev. 74, 1157 (1948)
  6. B. G. Sidharth, Revisiting Zitterbewegung, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 48, 497 (2009)
  7. J. Cserti and G. David, Unified description of Zitterbewegung for spintronic, graphene, and superconducting systems, Phys. Rev. B 74, 172305 (2006)
  8. M. Peshkin and A. Tonomura, The Aharonov-Bohm Effect (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989)
  9. A. D. Sakharov, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR [Sov. Phys. -Dokl, 12, 1040 (1968)]
  10. Wang, Xiong and Qiu, Photon wave function and zitterbewegung, Phys. Rev. A 80, 032118 (2009)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Davis, B. S.
Affiliations
Xavier University of Louisiana (US)
Corresponding author
Davis, Basil S.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2006.16003
arXiv
2006.16003
OpenAlex
W3037908260
Cited by
6
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
Zitterbewegung, elementary charge, Dirac equation, relativistic wave equations, electron velocity, special relativity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review