PreprintCited by 178Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsArtificial Intelligence in GamesAI-based Problem Solving and Planning

Neural Map: Structured Memory for Deep Reinforcement Learning

Open access
Parisotto, Emilio, Salakhutdinov, Ruslan·2017·arXiv

Abstract

A critical component to enabling intelligent reasoning in partially observable environments is memory. Despite this importance, Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) agents have so far used relatively simple memory architectures, with the main methods to overcome partial observability being either a temporal convolution over the past k frames or an LSTM layer. More recent work (Oh et al., 2016) has went beyond these architectures by using memory networks which can allow more sophisticated addressing schemes over the past k frames. But even these architectures are unsatisfactory due to the reason that they are limited to only remembering information from the last k frames. In this paper, we develop a memory system with an adaptable write operator that is customized to the sorts of 3D environments that DRL agents typically interact with. This architecture, called the Neural Map, uses a spatially structured 2D memory image to learn to store arbitrary information about the environment over long time lags. We demonstrate empirically that the Neural Map surpasses previous DRL memories on a set of challenging 2D and 3D maze environments and show that it is capable of generalizing to environments that were not seen during training.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1702.08360

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MemoryRepository mimics the human memory process, allowing AI NPC to forget short-term memory, thereby freeing up memory space.

    “This mechanism mimics the human memory process, allowing AI NPC to forget short-term memory, thereby freeing up memory space [16].”

    From MemoryRepository for AI NPC (2024) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Introduction (pp. 1–2) describes Neural Map’s selective writes and bounded memory size, not a MemoryRepository or a mechanism for forgetting short-term memories to free space. A search for human-memory mimicry and short-term forgetting found no passage addressing those claims. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parisotto, E., & Salakhutdinov, R.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2017
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2594903727
Cited by
178
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Keywords
neural maps, structured memory, memory networks, deep reinforcement learning, partial observability, long-term memory, 3D environments, maze navigation, memory addressing, generalization to unseen environments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review