The DOI matches its DataCite record; 52 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learning
Open accessAbstract
Given a simple request like Put a washed apple in the kitchen fridge, humans can reason in purely abstract terms by imagining action sequences and scoring their likelihood of success, prototypicality, and efficiency, all without moving a muscle. Once we see the kitchen in question, we can update our abstract plans to fit the scene. Embodied agents require the same abilities, but existing work does not yet provide the infrastructure necessary for both reasoning abstractly and executing concretely. We address this limitation by introducing ALFWorld, a simulator that enables agents to learn abstract, text based policies in TextWorld (Côté et al., 2018) and then execute goals from the ALFRED benchmark (Shridhar et al., 2020) in a rich visual environment. ALFWorld enables the creation of a new BUTLER agent whose abstract knowledge, learned in TextWorld, corresponds directly to concrete, visually grounded actions. In turn, as we demonstrate empirically, this fosters better agent generalization than training only in the visually grounded environment. BUTLER's simple, modular design factors the problem to allow researchers to focus on models for improving every piece of the pipeline (language understanding, planning, navigation, and visual scene understanding).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“ALFWorld (Shridhar et al., 2020) is an embodied AI benchmark in which agents must complete household tasks by following natural language instructions in a simulated environment.”
From Agentic Memory: Learning Unified Long-Term and Short-Term Memory Management for Large Language Model Agents (2026) · cites this paper as Shridhar et al., 2020
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In practice, failed trajectories often contain correct substeps (e.g., 'successfully navigating and retrieving an egg, but failing to boil it' [16]), while successful ones may include suboptimal actions that accidentally cancel out.”
From Learning Hierarchical Procedural Memory for LLM Agents through Bayesian Selection and Contrastive Refinement (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“ALFWorld [16] (2,851 train, 274 test) is a text-based embodied environment with six household tasks (e.g., retrieval, placement).”
From Learning Hierarchical Procedural Memory for LLM Agents through Bayesian Selection and Contrastive Refinement (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Trajectories thus capture the full decision process, not merely terminal success or failure, and provide dense supervision for how an agent progresses through a task [16, 22].”
From Learning Hierarchical Procedural Memory for LLM Agents through Bayesian Selection and Contrastive Refinement (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“ALFWorld. The ALFWorld benchmark [35] involves embodied instruction following where a text-based agent commands a simulated robotic agent in household settings. Given a natural-language goal (e.g., 'Put a cooled apple in the microwave'), the agent navigates rooms, identifies objects, and manipulates them via textual actions; performance is measured by goal-completion rate.”
From HarnessX: A Composable, Adaptive, and Evolvable Agent Harness Foundry (2026) · cites this paper as [35]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These tasks require long-horizon interaction with objects, making ALFWorld well suited for evaluating planning and memory management capabilities.”
From Agentic Memory: Learning Unified Long-Term and Short-Term Memory Management for Large Language Model Agents (2026) · cites this paper as Shridhar et al., 2020
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“In practice, failed trajectories often contain correct substeps (e.g., 'successfully navigating and retrieving an egg, but failing to boil it' [16]), while successful ones may include suboptimal actions that accidentally cancel out.”
From Learning Hierarchical Procedural Memory for LLM Agents through Bayesian Selection and Contrastive Refinement (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context
Lin, T.-Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., & Zitnick, C. L. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 · Cited by 45,460
He, K., Gkioxari, G., Dollar, P., & Girshick, R. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.322 · Cited by 29,137
Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder–Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1179 · Cited by 25,545
MuJoCo: A physics engine for model-based control
Todorov, E., Erez, T., & Tassa, Y. (2012) · 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems · doi:10.1109/iros.2012.6386109 · Cited by 4,767
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.01108 · Cited by 4,653
VQA: Visual Question Answering
Antol, S., Agrawal, A., Lu, J., Mitchell, M., Batra, D., Zitnick, C. L., & Parikh, D. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.279 · Cited by 4,487
ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Tasks
Lu, J., Batra, D., Parikh, D., & Lee, S. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.02265 · Cited by 2,109
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [2](2) where hog ∈ RLo×4H is the aggregated observation representation. 14 Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2021 Next, a linear transformation projects the aggregated representations to a space with size H = 64: hog = L tanh(hog).
- [4](4) in which, the mean pooling is performed along the dimension of number of tokens, i.e., hRNN ∈ RH . ht−1 is the output of the GRU cell at game step t − 1. A.4 DECODER Our decoder consists of an embedding layer, a transformer block and a pointer softmax mechanism (Gulcehre et al., 2016). We first obtain the source representation by concatenating hog and ht, resulting hsrc ∈ RLo×2H . Similar to the encoder, the embedding layer is frozen after initializing it with pre-trained BERT embeddings. The transformer block consists of two attention layers and a 3-layer MLP with ReLU non-linear activation functions inbetween. The first attention layer computes the self attention of the input embeddings hself as a contextual encoding for the target tokens. The second attention layer then computes the attention αi src ∈ RLo between the source representation hsrc and the i-th token in hself. The i-th target token is consequently represented by the weighted sum of hsrc, with the weights α i src. This generates a source information-aware target representation h′tgt ∈ RLtgt×H , where Ltgt denotes the number of tokens in the target sequence. Next, h′tgt is fed into the 3-layer MLP with ReLU activation functions inbetween, resulting htgt ∈ RLtgt×H . The block hidden size of this transformer is H = 64. Taking htgt as input, a linear layer with tanh activation projects the target representation into the same space as the embeddings (with dimensionality of 768), then the pre-trained embedding matrix E generates output logits (Press and Wolf, 2016), where the output size is same as the vocabulary size. The resulting logits are then normalized by a softmax to generate a probability distribution over all tokens in vocabulary: pa(yi) = ESoftmax(Ltanh(htgt)),
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning
Shinn, N., Cassano, F., Berman, E., Gopinath, A., Narasimhan, K., & Yao, S. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.11366 · Cited by 1,087
“Specifically, we challenge an agent to perform search-based question answering on HotPotQA [30], multi-step tasks in common household environments in AlfWorld [24], and code writing tasks in competition-like environments with interpreters and compilers in HumanEval [5], MBPP [2], and LeetcodeHard, a new benchmark.”
The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey
Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jin, S., Zhou, E., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.07864 · Cited by 972
The rise and potential of large language model based agents: a survey
Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jin, S., Zhou, E., et al. (2025) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-024-4222-0 · Cited by 970
ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models
Yao, S., Zhao, J., Yu, D., Du, N., Shafran, I., Narasimhan, K., & Cao, Y. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.03629 · Cited by 608
TidyBot: personalized robot assistance with large language models
Wu, J., Antonova, R., Kan, A., Lepert, M., Zeng, A., Song, S., Bohg, J., Rusinkiewicz, S. M., & Funkhouser, T. A. (2023) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1007/s10514-023-10139-z · Cited by 345
Metadata
- Authors
- Shridhar, M., Yuan, X., Côté, M.-A., Bisk, Y., Trischler, A., & Hausknecht, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2010.03768
- OpenAlex
- W3126325318
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
- Keywords
- ALFWorld, embodied agents, abstract planning, visual grounding, scene understanding, interactive learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
