The DOI matches its DataCite record; 52 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learning
Open accessAbstract
Given a simple request like Put a washed apple in the kitchen fridge, humans can reason in purely abstract terms by imagining action sequences and scoring their likelihood of success, prototypicality, and efficiency, all without moving a muscle. Once we see the kitchen in question, we can update our abstract plans to fit the scene. Embodied agents require the same abilities, but existing work does not yet provide the infrastructure necessary for both reasoning abstractly and executing concretely. We address this limitation by introducing ALFWorld, a simulator that enables agents to learn abstract, text based policies in TextWorld (Côté et al., 2018) and then execute goals from the ALFRED benchmark (Shridhar et al., 2020) in a rich visual environment. ALFWorld enables the creation of a new BUTLER agent whose abstract knowledge, learned in TextWorld, corresponds directly to concrete, visually grounded actions. In turn, as we demonstrate empirically, this fosters better agent generalization than training only in the visually grounded environment. BUTLER's simple, modular design factors the problem to allow researchers to focus on models for improving every piece of the pipeline (language understanding, planning, navigation, and visual scene understanding).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“ALFWorld (Shridhar et al., 2020) is an embodied AI benchmark in which agents must complete household tasks by following natural language instructions in a simulated environment.”
From Agentic Memory: Learning Unified Long-Term and Short-Term Memory Management for Large Language Model Agents (2026) · cites this paper as Shridhar et al., 2020
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In practice, failed trajectories often contain correct substeps (e.g., 'successfully navigating and retrieving an egg, but failing to boil it' [16]), while successful ones may include suboptimal actions that accidentally cancel out.”
From Learning Hierarchical Procedural Memory for LLM Agents through Bayesian Selection and Contrastive Refinement (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“ALFWorld [16] (2,851 train, 274 test) is a text-based embodied environment with six household tasks (e.g., retrieval, placement).”
From Learning Hierarchical Procedural Memory for LLM Agents through Bayesian Selection and Contrastive Refinement (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Trajectories thus capture the full decision process, not merely terminal success or failure, and provide dense supervision for how an agent progresses through a task [16, 22].”
From Learning Hierarchical Procedural Memory for LLM Agents through Bayesian Selection and Contrastive Refinement (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“ALFWorld. The ALFWorld benchmark [35] involves embodied instruction following where a text-based agent commands a simulated robotic agent in household settings. Given a natural-language goal (e.g., 'Put a cooled apple in the microwave'), the agent navigates rooms, identifies objects, and manipulates them via textual actions; performance is measured by goal-completion rate.”
From HarnessX: A Composable, Adaptive, and Evolvable Agent Harness Foundry (2026) · cites this paper as [35]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These tasks require long-horizon interaction with objects, making ALFWorld well suited for evaluating planning and memory management capabilities.”
From Agentic Memory: Learning Unified Long-Term and Short-Term Memory Management for Large Language Model Agents (2026) · cites this paper as Shridhar et al., 2020
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“In practice, failed trajectories often contain correct substeps (e.g., 'successfully navigating and retrieving an egg, but failing to boil it' [16]), while successful ones may include suboptimal actions that accidentally cancel out.”
From Learning Hierarchical Procedural Memory for LLM Agents through Bayesian Selection and Contrastive Refinement (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context
Lin, T.-Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., & Zitnick, C. L. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 · Cited by 45,460
He, K., Gkioxari, G., Dollar, P., & Girshick, R. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.322 · Cited by 29,137
Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder–Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1179 · Cited by 25,545
MuJoCo: A physics engine for model-based control
Todorov, E., Erez, T., & Tassa, Y. (2012) · 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems · doi:10.1109/iros.2012.6386109 · Cited by 4,767
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.01108 · Cited by 4,653
VQA: Visual Question Answering
Antol, S., Agrawal, A., Lu, J., Mitchell, M., Batra, D., Zitnick, C. L., & Parikh, D. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.279 · Cited by 4,487
ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Tasks
Lu, J., Batra, D., Parikh, D., & Lee, S. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.02265 · Cited by 2,109
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [2](2) where hog ∈ RLo×4H is the aggregated observation representation. 14 Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2021 Next, a linear transformation projects the aggregated representations to a space with size H = 64: hog = L tanh(hog).
- [4](4) in which, the mean pooling is performed along the dimension of number of tokens, i.e., hRNN ∈ RH . ht−1 is the output of the GRU cell at game step t − 1. A.4 DECODER Our decoder consists of an embedding layer, a transformer block and a pointer softmax mechanism (Gulcehre et al., 2016). We first obtain the source representation by concatenating hog and ht, resulting hsrc ∈ RLo×2H . Similar to the encoder, the embedding layer is frozen after initializing it with pre-trained BERT embeddings. The transformer block consists of two attention layers and a 3-layer MLP with ReLU non-linear activation functions inbetween. The first attention layer computes the self attention of the input embeddings hself as a contextual encoding for the target tokens. The second attention layer then computes the attention αi src ∈ RLo between the source representation hsrc and the i-th token in hself. The i-th target token is consequently represented by the weighted sum of hsrc, with the weights α i src. This generates a source information-aware target representation h′tgt ∈ RLtgt×H , where Ltgt denotes the number of tokens in the target sequence. Next, h′tgt is fed into the 3-layer MLP with ReLU activation functions inbetween, resulting htgt ∈ RLtgt×H . The block hidden size of this transformer is H = 64. Taking htgt as input, a linear layer with tanh activation projects the target representation into the same space as the embeddings (with dimensionality of 768), then the pre-trained embedding matrix E generates output logits (Press and Wolf, 2016), where the output size is same as the vocabulary size. The resulting logits are then normalized by a softmax to generate a probability distribution over all tokens in vocabulary: pa(yi) = ESoftmax(Ltanh(htgt)),
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning
Shinn, N., Cassano, F., Berman, E., Gopinath, A., Narasimhan, K., & Yao, S. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.11366 · Cited by 1,087
“Specifically, we challenge an agent to perform search-based question answering on HotPotQA [30], multi-step tasks in common household environments in AlfWorld [24], and code writing tasks in competition-like environments with interpreters and compilers in HumanEval [5], MBPP [2], and LeetcodeHard, a new benchmark.”
The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey
Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jin, S., Zhou, E., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.07864 · Cited by 972
The rise and potential of large language model based agents: a survey
Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jin, S., Zhou, E., et al. (2025) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-024-4222-0 · Cited by 970
ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models
Yao, S., Zhao, J., Yu, D., Du, N., Shafran, I., Narasimhan, K., & Cao, Y. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.03629 · Cited by 608
TidyBot: personalized robot assistance with large language models
Wu, J., Antonova, R., Kan, A., Lepert, M., Zeng, A., Song, S., Bohg, J., Rusinkiewicz, S. M., & Funkhouser, T. A. (2023) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1007/s10514-023-10139-z · Cited by 345
Expel: LLM agents are experiential learners
Zhao, A., Huang, D., Xu, Q., Lin, M., Liu, Y.-J., & Huang, G. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i17.29936 · Cited by 153
Episodic Transformer for Vision-and-Language Navigation
Pashevich, A., Schmid, C., & Sun, C. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01564 · Cited by 135
A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model-based Agents
Zhang, Z., Dai, Q., Bo, X., Ma, C., Li, R., Chen, X., Zhu, J., Dong, Z., & Wen, J.-R. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3748302 · Cited by 592
Moral Stories: Situated Reasoning about Norms, Intents, Actions, and their Consequences
Emelin, D., Bras, R. J. L., Hwang, J. D., Forbes, M., & Choi, Y. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.54 · Cited by 153
OSWorld 2.0: Benchmarking Computer Use Agents on Long-Horizon Real-World Tasks
Yuan, M., Zhou, Z., Xiong, X., Wu, W., Sun, J., Song, J., Cui, K., Wang, B., Wu, H., Li, Y., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.29537 · Cited by 79
Agentic Large Language Models, a Survey
Plaat, A., Van Duijn, M., Van Stein, N., Preuss, M., Van der Putten, P., & Batenburg, K. J. (2025) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.18675 · Cited by 75
Cognitive Architectures for Language Agents
Sumers, T. R., Yao, S., Narasimhan, K., & Griffiths, T. L. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.02427 · Cited by 72
“This includes interacting with games (Hausknecht et al., 2020; Côté et al., 2019; Shridhar et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2022a; Liu et al., 2023d), APIs (Schick et al., 2023; Yao et al., 2022b; Parisi et al., 2022; Tang et al., 2023b), and websites (Shi et al., 2017; Nakano et al., 2021; Yao et al.,…”
BackgroundFILM: Following Instructions in Language with Modular Methods
Min, S. Y., Chaplot, D. S., Ravikumar, P., Bisk, Y., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.07342 · Cited by 81
Self-citationToward large reasoning models: A survey of reinforced reasoning with large language models
Xu, F., Hao, Q., Shao, C., Zong, Z., Li, Y., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Lan, X., Gong, J., et al. (2025) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2025.101370 · Cited by 533
Understanding World or Predicting Future? A Comprehensive Survey of World Models
Ding, J., Zhang, Y., Shang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zong, Z., Feng, J., Yuan, Y., Su, H., Li, N., Sukiennik, N., et al. (2026) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3746449 · Cited by 169
Hierarchical Task Learning from Language Instructions with Unified Transformers and Self-Monitoring
Zhang, Y., & Chai, J. Y. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.368 · Cited by 52
Skill Induction and Planning with Latent Language
Sharma, P., Torralba, A., & Andreas, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.120 · Cited by 39
Embodied Multi-Modal Agent trained by an LLM from a Parallel TextWorld
Yang, Y., Zhou, T., Li, K., Tao, D., Li, L., Shen, L., He, X., Jiang, J., & Shi, Y. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.02482 · Cited by 51
SAGE: Self-evolving Agents with Reflective and Memory-augmented Abilities
Liang, X., Tao, M., Xia, Y., Wang, J., Li, K., Wang, Y., He, Y., Yang, J., Shi, T., Wang, Y., et al. (2025) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2025.130470 · Cited by 39
TDAG: A multi-agent framework based on dynamic Task Decomposition and Agent Generation
Wang, Y., Wu, Z., Yao, J., & Su, J. (2025) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2025.107200 · Cited by 75
Understanding the Dark Side of LLMs' Intrinsic Self-Correction
Zhang, Q., Wang, D., Qian, H., Li, Y., Zhang, T., Huang, M., Xu, K., Li, H., Yan, L., & Qiu, H. (2025) · Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1314 · Cited by 36
PlanGenLLMs: A Modern Survey of LLM Planning Capabilities
Wei, H., Zhang, Z., He, S., Xia, T., Pan, S., & Liu, F. (2025) · Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.958 · Cited by 36
Understanding the planning of LLM agents: A survey
Huang, X., Liu, W., Chen, X., Wang, X., Wang, H., Lian, D., Wang, Y., Tang, R., & Chen, E. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.02716 · Cited by 47
Language and culture internalization for human-like autotelic AI
Colas, C., Karch, T., Moulin-Frier, C., & Oudeyer, P.-Y. (2022) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00591-4 · Cited by 34
Aerial Vision-and-Dialog Navigation
Fan, Y., Chen, W., Jiang, T., Zhou, C., Zhang, Y., & Wang, X. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.190 · Cited by 55
Scene-LLM: Extending Language Model for 3D Visual Reasoning
Fu, R., Liu, J., Chen, X., Nie, Y., & Xiong, W. (2025) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv61041.2025.00220 · Cited by 36
Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agents
Yehudai, A., Eden, L., Li, A., Uziel, G., Zhao, Y., Bar-Haim, R., Cohan, A., & Shmueli-Scheuer, M. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.16416 · Cited by 26
Factorizing Perception and Policy for Interactive Instruction Following
Singh, K. P., Bhambri, S., Kim, B., Mottaghi, R., & Choi, J. (2021) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00190 · Cited by 25
Look Wide and Interpret Twice: Improving Performance on Interactive Instruction-following Tasks
Nguyen, V.-Q., Suganuma, M., & Okatani, T. (2021) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2021/128 · Cited by 24
On Grounded Planning for Embodied Tasks with Language Models
Lin, B. Y., Huang, C., Liu, Q., Gu, W., Sommerer, S., & Ren, X. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i11.26549 · Cited by 31
Visual language integration: A survey and open challenges
Park, S., & Kim, Y. (2023) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2023.100548 · Cited by 24
A Survey of Text Games for Reinforcement Learning Informed by Natural Language
Osborne, P., Nõmm, H., & Freitas, A. (2022) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00495 · Cited by 26
Tang, H., Key, D., & Ellis, K. (2024) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 · doi:10.52202/079017-2243 · Cited by 20
Communicative Learning with Natural Gestures for Embodied Navigation Agents with Human-in-the-Scene
Wu, Q., Wu, C.-J., Zhu, Y., & Joo, J. (2021) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros51168.2021.9636208 · Cited by 18
A survey of Semantic Reasoning frameworks for robotic systems
Liu, W., Daruna, A., Patel, M., Ramachandruni, K., & Chernova, S. (2022) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2022.104294 · Cited by 20
ReWOO: Decoupling Reasoning from Observations for Efficient Augmented Language Models
Xu, B., Peng, Z., Lei, B., Mukherjee, S., Liu, Y., & Xu, D. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.18323 · Cited by 17
Language Models are Few-Shot Butlers
Micheli, V., & Fleuret, F. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.734 · Cited by 35
Unlocking Robotic Autonomy: A Survey on the Applications of Foundation Models
Jang, D.-S., Cho, D.-H., Lee, W.-C., Ryu, S.-K., Jeong, B.-M., Hong, M., Jung, M., Kim, M., Lee, M., Lee, S., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Control Automation and Systems · doi:10.1007/s12555-024-0438-7 · Cited by 17
Situated language learning via interactive narratives
Ammanabrolu, P., & Riedl, M. O. (2021) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2021.100316 · Cited by 18
An LLM Compiler for Parallel Function Calling
Kim, S., Moon, S., Tabrizi, R., Lee, N., Mahoney, M. W., Keutzer, K., & Gholami, A. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.04511 · Cited by 12
“A notable work is ReWOO [53] which employs a planner to separate the reasoning process from the execution and observation phases to decrease token usage and cost as compared to ReAct.”
MethodLLMs Can't Plan, But Can Help Planning in LLM-Modulo Frameworks
Kambhampati, S., Valmeekam, K., Guan, L., Verma, M., Stechly, K., Bhambri, S., Saldyt, L., & Murthy, A. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.01817 · Cited by 237
A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model based Agents
Zhang, Z., Bo, X., Ma, C., Li, R., Chen, X., Dai, Q., Zhu, J., Dong, Z., & Wen, J.-R. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.13501 · Cited by 149
A Systematic Survey of Text Worlds as Embodied Natural Language Environments
Jansen, P. (2022) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.wordplay-1.1 · Cited by 19
Pragmatics in Language Grounding: Phenomena, Tasks, and Modeling Approaches
Fried, D., Tomlin, N., Hu, J. C. W., Patel, R., & Nematzadeh, A. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.840 · Cited by 29
Retroformer: Retrospective Large Language Agents with Policy Gradient Optimization
Yao, W., Heinecke, S., Niebles, J. C., Liu, Z., Feng, Y., Xue, L., Murthy, R., Chen, Z., Zhang, J., Arpit, D., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.02151 · Cited by 10
“Recently, Shinn et al. (2023) presents Reflexion, a framework that equips agents with dynamic memory and self-reflection capabilities, enhancing their reasoning skills.”
MethodInfluentialAutoPlan: Automatic Planning of Interactive Decision-Making Tasks With Large Language Models
Ouyang, S., & Li, L. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.205 · Cited by 12
DAWN: Designing Distributed Agents in a Worldwide Network
Aminiranjbar, Z., Tang, J., Wang, Q., Pant, S., & Viswanathan, M. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3588425 · Cited by 15
Learning to Mediate Disparities Towards Pragmatic Communication
Bao, Y., Ghosh, S., & Chai, J. Y. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.202 · Cited by 10
Few-shot Subgoal Planning with Language Models
Logeswaran, L., Fu, Y., Lee, M., & Lee, H. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.402 · Cited by 19
Enhancing LLM Reasoning Capabilities Through Brokered Multi-Expert Reflection
Sheokand, T., Jain, G., Bahga, A., & Madisetti, V. K. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3561693 · Cited by 7
DAWN: Designing Distributed Agents in a Worldwide Network
Aminiranjbar, Z., Tang, J., Wang, Q., Pant, S., & Viswanathan, M. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.22339 · Cited by 8
Kapoor, S., Stroebl, B., Siegel, Z. S., Nadgir, N., & Narayanan, A. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.01502 · Cited by 13
“AlfWorld[45] Household tasks Measurestheaccuracyofagentsonmanydifferenttaskswithinthehouseholdenvironment.”
Sim2RealQA: Using Life Simulation to Solve Question Answering Real-World Events
Miyanishi, T., Maekawa, T., & Kawanabe, M. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3080275 · Cited by 6
A Zero-Shot Language Agent for Computer Control with Structured Reflection
Li, T., Li, G., Deng, Z., Wang, B. K., & Li, Y. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.753 · Cited by 33
Visually Grounded Language Learning: A Review of Language Games, Datasets, Tasks, and Models
Suglia, A., Konstas, I., & Lemon, O. (2024) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.15185 · Cited by 10
The Embodied Crossmodal Self Forms Language and Interaction: A Computational Cognitive Review
Röder, F., Özdemir, O., Nguyen, P. D. H., Wermter, S., & Eppe, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.716671 · Cited by 7
Fang, J., Peng, Y., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Yi, X., Zhang, G., Xu, Y., Wu, B., Liu, S., Li, Z., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.07407 · Cited by 6
Liu, J., Hao, W., Cheng, K., & Jin, D. (2025) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110319 · Cited by 5
ROIL: Rule Optimization via Large Language Model for Imitation Learning
Tianrungroj, Y., & Iba, H. (2024) · IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) · doi:10.1109/cec60901.2024.10612166 · Cited by 5
Hierarchical Control of Situated Agents through Natural Language
Zhou, S., Yin, P., & Neubig, G. (2022) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.suki-1.8 · Cited by 5
AriGraph: Learning Knowledge Graph World Models with Episodic Memory for LLM Agents
Anokhin, P., Semenov, N., Sorokin, A., Evseev, D., Kravchenko, A., Burtsev, M., & Burnaev, E. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.04363 · Cited by 8
“However, these approaches lack mechanisms for updates in dynamic environments, a key advantage of AriGraph.”
ResilioMate: A Resilient Multi-Agent Task Executing Framework for Enhancing Small Language Models
Xiong, Y., Huang, M., Liang, X., & Tao, M. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3567244 · Cited by 4
MatchNav: LLM-based enhanced description and instruction matching in vision-and-language navigation
Wang, C., Wei, S., & Juntong, Q. (2025) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103444 · Cited by 5
Improving Long-Horizon Imitation through Instruction Prediction
Hejna, J., Abbeel, P., & Pinto, L. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i7.25951 · Cited by 4
TextWorldExpress: Simulating Text Games at One Million Steps Per Second
Jansen, P., & Côté, M.-A. (2023) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-demo.20 · Cited by 5
Self-citationUsing interactive teaching methods in English lessons
Karhina, N. (2023) · Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University Series “Pedagogy and Psychology” · doi:10.52534/msu-pp1.2023.09 · Cited by 4
A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words: Language Models Plan from Pixels
Liu, A., Logeswaran, L., Sohn, S., & Lee, H. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.1025 · Cited by 7
AgentSquare: Automatic LLM Agent Search in Modular Design Space
Shang, Y., Li, Y., Zhao, K., Ma, L., Liu, J., Xu, F., & Li, Y. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.06153 · Cited by 3
“Moreover, we illustrate two new modules and the human interpretable design insights discovered on ALFWorld in Figure 6.”
InfluentialReTA: Recursively Thinking Ahead to Improve the Strategic Reasoning of Large Language Models
Duan, J., Wang, S., Diffenderfer, J., Sun, L., Chen, T., Kailkhura, B., & Xu, K. (2024) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-long.123 · Cited by 7
Multitask Multimodal Prompted Training for Interactive Embodied Task Completion
Πανταζόπουλος, Γ., Nikandrou, M., Parekh, A., Hemanthage, B., Eshghi, A., Konstas, I., Rieser, V., Lemon, O., & Suglia, A. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.50 · Cited by 7
Look Further Ahead: Testing the Limits of GPT-4 in Path Planning
Aghzal, M., Plaku, E., & Yao, Z. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE) · doi:10.1109/case59546.2024.10711396 · Cited by 6
Compositional Generalization in Grounded Language Learning via Induced Model Sparsity
Spilsbury, S., & Ilin, A. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Student Research Workshop (NAACL SRW) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-srw.19 · Cited by 3
Visual Semantic Planning for Service Robot via Natural Language Instructions
Wang, K., Zhang, Y., Jiang, C., Luo, J., Xueke, Y., & Chen, S. (2021) · China Automation Congress (CAC) · doi:10.1109/cac53003.2021.9728603 · Cited by 3
3DLLM-Mem: Long-Term Spatial-Temporal Memory for Embodied 3D Large Language Model
Hu, W., Hong, Y., Wang, Y., Gao, L., Wei, Z., Yao, X., Peng, N., Bitton, Y., Szpektor, I., & Chang, K.-W. (2025) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38 · doi:10.52202/085713-2278 · Cited by 27
A Language-First Approach for Procedure Planning
Liu, J., Li, S., Wang, Z., Li, M., & Ji, H. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.122 · Cited by 4
Story Shaping: Teaching Agents Human-Like Behavior with Stories
Peng, X., Cui, C., Zhou, W. G., Jia, R., & Riedl, M. O. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment · doi:10.1609/aiide.v19i1.27528 · Cited by 6
Household Navigation and Manipulation for Everyday Object Rearrangement Tasks
Iyer, S. R., Pal, A., Hu, J., Adeleye, A., Aggarwal, A., & Christensen, H. I. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Robotic Computing (IRC) · doi:10.1109/irc59093.2023.00021 · Cited by 2
RRdE: A Decision Making Framework for Language Agents in Interactive Environments
Zhou, X., Li, L., & Zeng, D. D. (2024) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn60899.2024.10650094 · Cited by 3
Generative AI in Embodied Systems: System-Level Analysis of Performance, Efficiency and Scalability
Wan, Z., Qian, J., Du, Y., Jabbour, J., Du, Y., Zhao, Y. K., Raychowdhury, A., Krishna, T., & Reddi, V. J. (2025) · IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS) · doi:10.1109/ispass64960.2025.00013 · Cited by 6
Manibalan, B., Jothi, J. A. A., & Rajam, V. M. A. (2024) · IEEE World Conference on Applied Intelligence and Computing (AIC) · doi:10.1109/aic61668.2024.10731031 · Cited by 2
Modeling Worlds in TextPreprint
Ammanabrolu, P., & Riedl, M. O. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.09578 · Cited by 4
SILG: The Multi-environment Symbolic Interactive Language Grounding BenchmarkPreprint
Zhong, V., Hanjie, A. W., Wang, S. I., Narasimhan, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.10661 · Cited by 6
Wu, C., Luo, Y., Qu, Z., & Wang, M. (2025) · arXiv · Cited by 1
Preble: Efficient Distributed Prompt Scheduling for LLM Serving
Srivatsa, V., He, Z., Abhyankar, R., Li, D., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.00023 · Cited by 1
“The workload we utilize is sourced from the ALFWorld [45] dataset and has 7.5k requests.”
MethodSmartPlay: A Benchmark for LLMs as Intelligent Agents
Wu, Y., Tang, X., Mitchell, T. M., & Li, Y. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.01557 · Cited by 6
“Shridhar et al. (2020b) demonstrated the possibility of converting a 3D embodied indoor environment (Shridhar et al., 2020a) into a TextWorld (C ˆ ot ´ e et al., 2018) game by “listing” all the objects in text.”
BackgroundThe Illusion of Diminishing Returns: Measuring Long Horizon Execution in LLMs
Sinha, A., Arun, A., Goel, S., Staab, S., & Geiping, J. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.09677 · Cited by 1
“In Section A, we demonstrate how self-conditioning is a significant failure mode for LLM agents even in realistic benchmarks like ALFWorld (Shridhar et al., 2021), GAIA (Mialon et al., 2024), and WebShop (Yao et al., 2022).”
Yu, Y., Yao, L., Xie, Y., Tan, Q., Feng, J., Li, Y., & Wu, L. (2026) · Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.981 · Cited by 4
Small Language Model Agent for the Operations of Continuously Updating ICT Systems
Fukuda, N., Nozue, H., & Oishi, H. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3544637 · Cited by 3
ALAS: A Stateful Multi-LLM Agent Framework for Disruption-Aware Planning
Chang, E. Y. (2025) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3749421.3749436 · Cited by 1
Meta-reasoning in autonomous agents: performance gains across benchmarks and models
Talukdar, W., Biswas, A., Shankar, G., Shinde, V., & Parekh, G. (2026) · Academia AI and Applications · doi:10.20935/acadai8229 · Cited by 2
Wang, X., Li, L., & Zeng, D. D. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.309 · Cited by 2
Wang, R., Todd, G., Yuan, X., Xiao, Z., Côté, M.-A., & Jansen, P. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.830 · Cited by 17
Self-citationZhao, Z., Sun, M., & Ma, X. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.metanlp-1.1 · Cited by 1
SocialAI: Benchmarking Socio-Cognitive Abilities in Deep Reinforcement Learning AgentsPreprint
Kovač, G., Portelas, R., Hofmann, K., & Oudeyer, P. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.00956 · Cited by 9
Xu, F., Zhou, T., Nguyen, T., Bao, H., Lin, C., & Du, J. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4805664 · Cited by 1
Sun, X., Wang, Q., Li, H., & Chen, L. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.03137
“The initial input for ALFWorld, SciWorld, PDDL, and BabyAI is the first observation returned by the benchmark.”
InfluentialWikiSkill: Compiling Agent Experience into Persistent Knowledge for Skill Evolution
Tang, L., Rashtchian, C., Ferng, C.-S., Tomkins, A., Juan, D.-C., & Vu, T. (2026) · arXiv · Cited by 1
“…(LiveMath) (He et al., 2026)), web search ( SealQA (Pham et al., 2026)), spreadsheet manipulation ( SpreadsheetBench (SpreadSheet) (Ma et al., 2024)), long-context document question answering OfficeQA (Singhvi et al., 2025)), and interactive embodied tasks ( ALFWorld (Shridhar et al., 2021)).”
InfluentialHarnessX: A Composable, Adaptive, and Evolvable Agent Harness Foundry
Chen, T., Lu, S., Zhao, K., Meng, W., Teng, H., Li, T., Li, C., Liu, X., Liang, J., Zhang, Z., et al. (2026) · arXiv
Metadata
- Authors
- Shridhar, M., Yuan, X., Côté, M.-A., Bisk, Y., Trischler, A., & Hausknecht, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2010.03768
- OpenAlex
- W3126325318
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
- Keywords
- ALFWorld, embodied agents, abstract planning, visual grounding, scene understanding, interactive learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
