PreprintCited by 53Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 45 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring Disentanglement: A Review of Metrics

Open access

Abstract

Learning to disentangle and represent factors of variation in data is an important problem in AI. While many advances have been made to learn these representations, it is still unclear how to quantify disentanglement. While several metrics exist, little is known on their implicit assumptions, what they truly measure, and their limits. In consequence, it is difficult to interpret results when comparing different representations. In this work, we survey supervised disentanglement metrics and thoroughly analyze them. We propose a new taxonomy in which all metrics fall into one of three families: intervention-based, predictor-based and information-based. We conduct extensive experiments in which we isolate properties of disentangled representations, allowing stratified comparison along several axes. From our experiment results and analysis, we provide insights on relations between disentangled representation properties. Finally, we share guidelines on how to measure disentanglement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2012.09276

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If discrete bottlenecks learn a disentangled representation, then they are independent and each explains a distinct factor of the data.

    “If the discrete bottlenecks learn of a disentangled representation, then (a) they have to be independent (b) each one has to explain a distinct factor of the data (Carbonneau et al., 2020).”

    From Learning Cognitive Maps from Transformer Representations for Efficient Planning in Partially Observed Environments (2024) · cites this paper as Carbonneau et al., 2020

    Section 2.1 says that factors in a disentangled representation are independent in representation space and affect separate subspaces. It does not discuss discrete bottlenecks or require each bottleneck to explain a distinct factor; Section 2.1 also notes that multiple code dimensions can describe one factor. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. C. P. Burgess, I. Higgins, A. Pal, L. Matthey, N. Watters, G. Desjardins, and A. Lerchner, "Understanding dis- entangling in β-vae," in Workshop on Learning Disentangled Representations at the 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Carbonneau, M.-A., Zaidi, J., Boilard, J., & Gagnon, G.
Affiliations
  • Ubisoft (Canada) (CA)
  • École de Technologie Supérieure (CA)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
8747-8761
ISSN
2162-237X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3112497262
Cited by
52
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Espace ÉTS (ETS) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Mitacs
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
disentangled representations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review