PreprintCited by 88Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisVideo Analysis and Summarization

GODIVA: Generating Open-DomaIn Videos from nAtural Descriptions

Open access
Wu, Chenfei, Huang, Lun, Zhang, Qianxi, Li, Binyang, Ji, Lei, Yang, Fan, Sapiro, Guillermo, Duan, Nan·2021·arXiv

Abstract

Generating videos from text is a challenging task due to its high computational requirements for training and infinite possible answers for evaluation. Existing works typically experiment on simple or small datasets, where the generalization ability is quite limited. In this work, we propose GODIVA, an open-domain text-to-video pretrained model that can generate videos from text in an auto-regressive manner using a three-dimensional sparse attention mechanism. We pretrain our model on Howto100M, a large-scale text-video dataset that contains more than 136 million text-video pairs. Experiments show that GODIVA not only can be fine-tuned on downstream video generation tasks, but also has a good zero-shot capability on unseen texts. We also propose a new metric called Relative Matching (RM) to automatically evaluate the video generation quality. Several challenges are listed and discussed as future work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2104.14806

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [11][11] Yitong Li, Martin Min, Dinghan Shen, David Carlson, and Lawrence Carin. Video generation from text. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume 32, 2018. -
  2. [14][14] Gaurav Mittal, Tanya Marwah, and Vineeth N. Balasubramanian. Sync-draw: Automatic video generation using deep recurrent attentive architectures. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages 1096-1104, 2017. -
  3. [17][17] Tingting Qiao, Jing Zhang, Duanqing Xu, and Dacheng Tao. MirrorGAN: Learning Text-toimage Generation by Redescription. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 1505-1514, 2019. -
  4. [19][19] Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, and Ilya Sutskever. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI Blog , 1(8), 2019. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, C., Huang, L., Zhang, Q., Li, B., Ji, L., Yang, F., Sapiro, G., & Duan, N.
Affiliations
  • Microsoft Research Asia (China) (CN)
  • Duke University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3157199281
Cited by
85
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 16 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Analysis and Summarization
Keywords
text-to-video generation, sparse attention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review