Improving the Accessibility of Scientific Documents: Current State, User Needs, and a System Solution to Enhance Scientific PDF Accessibility for Blind and Low Vision Users
Open accessAbstract
The majority of scientific papers are distributed in PDF, which pose challenges for accessibility, especially for blind and low vision (BLV) readers. We characterize the scope of this problem by assessing the accessibility of 11,397 PDFs published 2010--2019 sampled across various fields of study, finding that only 2.4% of these PDFs satisfy all of our defined accessibility criteria. We introduce the SciA11y system to offset some of the issues around inaccessibility. SciA11y incorporates several machine learning models to extract the content of scientific PDFs and render this content as accessible HTML, with added novel navigational features to support screen reader users. An intrinsic evaluation of extraction quality indicates that the majority of HTML renders (87%) produced by our system have no or only some readability issues. We perform a qualitative user study to understand the needs of BLV researchers when reading papers, and to assess whether the SciA11y system could address these needs. We summarize our user study findings into a set of five design recommendations for accessible scientific reader systems. User response to SciA11y was positive, with all users saying they would be likely to use the system in the future, and some stating that the system, if available, would become their primary workflow. We successfully produce HTML renders for over 12M papers, of which an open access subset of 1.5M are available for browsing at https://scia11y.org/
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research on academic workflows has highlighted the importance of accessible tools and inclusive practices, especially as the research community becomes increasingly diverse.
“Separately, research on academic workflows has highlighted the importance of accessible tools and inclusive practices, especially as the research community becomes increasingly diverse [34, 50, 54, 76].”
From "I Don't Trust Any Professional Research Tool": A Re-Imagination of Knowledge Production Workflows by, with, and for Blind and Low-Vision Researchers (2026) · cites this paper as [76]
The Discussion (p. 32) calls for systems that support blind and low-vision researchers, and the Conclusion (p. 33) urges designers to account for their needs. These passages support the importance of accessible tools and inclusive practices in research workflows, but they do not establish that the research community is becoming increasingly diverse. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAccessibility compliance varies substantially by the typesetting platform, with Microsoft Word producing the most accessible PDFs while LaTeX invariably yielding the least.
“First, both Wang et al. [39] and Kumar et al. [10] found that accessibility compliance varies substantially by the typesetting platform, with Microsoft Word producing the most accessible PDFs while LaTeX invariably yielding the least.”
From iTagPDF: Towards Finally Automating PDF Accessibility (2026) · cites this paper as [39]
Section 3.5 (p. 11) finds significant differences in compliance across typesetting software and identifies Microsoft Word as producing the most accessible PDFs. Section 3.6 (p. 14) says LaTeX produces PDFs with the lowest compliance among the common software examined. Neither passage supports “invariably”: the findings describe distributions and overall rankings, not every PDF. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAuthors often fail to provide accessibility metadata consistently or at adequate quality, rendering most academic content inaccessible to people with disabilities.
“Unsurprisingly, authors often fail to provide this metadata consistently or at adequate quality, rendering most academic content inaccessible to people with disabilities, as the following studies demonstrate.”
From iTagPDF: Towards Finally Automating PDF Accessibility (2026) · cites this paper as [39]
The Introduction (p. 2) says accessibility features are often missing from scientific PDFs, and the Summary of analyses (p. 13) reports that only about 2.4% of sampled PDFs met all five criteria. The study does not assess the quality of metadata authors provide; its accessibility findings concern paper PDFs, chiefly for blind and low-vision readers, rather than all academic content or all disabilities. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPage structure is important when situating a visualization and simplifying navigation between visualization and supporting information.
“screen reader accessible charts, we observe the importance of page structure when situating a visualization and simplifying navigation between visualization and supporting information [123].”
From The Accessibility of Data Visualizations on the Web for Screen Reader Users: Practices and Experiences During COVID-19 (2023) · cites this paper as [123]
Tools such as SciA11y and Paper to HTML have been developed to convert PDFs into more accessible and interactive HTML formats.
“Consequently, tools such as SciA11y [39] and Paper to HTML [38] have been developed to convert PDFs into more accessible and interactive HTML formats.”
From iTagPDF: Towards Finally Automating PDF Accessibility (2026) · cites this paper as [39]
Wang et al. found that only 2.4% of roughly 11k academic PDFs were compliant with Adobe-5 standards.
“Wang et al. [39] expanded this analysis through automated evaluation of roughly 11k academic PDFs from diverse venues and noted that only 2.4% papers were compliant with Adobe-5 standards.”
From iTagPDF: Towards Finally Automating PDF Accessibility (2026) · cites this paper as [39]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis
Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441 · Cited by 13,912 · see citing works
Vertex component analysis: a fast algorithm to unmix hyperspectral data
Nascimento, J. M. P., & Bioucas‐Dias, J. M. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2005.844293 · Cited by 2,683 · see citing works
Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction
Amershi, S., Weld, D., Vorvoreanu, M., Fourney, A., Nushi, B., Collisson, P., Suh, J., Iqbal, S., Bennett, P. N., Inkpen, K., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300233 · Cited by 2,439 · see citing works
Self-citationWeb content accessibility guidelines 1.0
Chisholm, W. A., Vanderheiden, G. C., & Jacobs, I. (2001) · interactions · doi:10.1145/379537.379550 · Cited by 987 · see citing works
Wobbrock, J. O., Kane, S. K., Gajos, K. Z., Harada, S., & Froehlich, J. E. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing · doi:10.1145/1952383.1952384 · Cited by 590 · see citing works
S2ORC: The Semantic Scholar Open Research Corpus
Lo, K., Wang, L. L., Neumann, M., Kinney, R., & Weld, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.447 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
Self-citationA Review of Microsoft Academic Services for Science of Science Studies
Wang, K., Shen, Z., Huang, C., Wu, C., Eide, D., Dong, Y., Qian, J., Kanakia, A., Chen, A., & Rogahn, R. (2019) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2019.00045 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Twitter A11y: A Browser Extension to Make Twitter Images Accessible
Gleason, C., Pavel, A., McCamey, E., Low, C., Carrington, P., Kitani, K., & Bigham, J. P. (2020) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376728 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
A Web-scale system for scientific knowledge exploration
Shen, Z., Ma, H., & Wang, K. (2018) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-4015 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Extracting Scientific Figures with Distantly Supervised Neural Networks
Siegel, N., Lourie, N., Power, R., & Ammar, W. (2018) · ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries · doi:10.1145/3197026.3197040 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Peißner, M., Häbe, D., Janssen, D., & Sellner, T. (2012) · ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems (EICS) · doi:10.1145/2305484.2305500 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
TEXUS: A unified framework for extracting and understanding tables in PDF documents
Rastan, R., Paik, H.-Y., & Shepherd, J. A. (2019) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2019.01.008 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
The Portable Document Format (PDF) accessibility practice of four journal publishers
Nganji, J. T. (2015) · Library & Information Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2015.02.002 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Engel, C., Müller, E. F., & Weber, G. (2019) · International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA) · doi:10.1145/3316782.3316793 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Construction of the Literature Graph in Semantic ScholarPreprint
Ammar, W., Groeneveld, D., Bhagavatula, C., Beltagy, I., Crawford, M., Downey, D., Dunkelberger, J., Elgohary, A., Feldman, S., Ha, V., et al. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.02262 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationMultimodal Deep Learning using Images and Text for Information Graphic Classification
Kim, E., & McCoy, K. F. (2018) · Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3234695.3236357 · Cited by 39 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Some work has focused on addressing components of paper accessibility, such as the correct way for screen readers to interpret and read mathematical equations [1, 4, 16, 17, 26, 44, 45], describe charts and figures [12–14], automatically generate figure captions [9, 37], or automatically classify the content of figure…”
Multimedia platform for mathematics’ interactive learning accessible to blind people
Maćkowski, M., Brzoza, P., Żabka, M., & Spińczyk, D. (2017) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-017-4526-z · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Enhancing the Accessibility of Mathematics for Blind People: The AudioMath Project
Ferreira, H., & Freitas, D. (2004) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-27817-7_101 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Making the web easier to see with opportunistic accessibility improvement
Bigham, J. P. (2014) · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) · doi:10.1145/2642918.2647357 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Towards making mathematics a first class citizen in general screen readers
Sorge, V., Chen, C., Raman, T. V., & Tseng, D. S. D. (2014) · International Web for All Conference (W4A) · doi:10.1145/2596695.2596700 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Creating accessible PDFs for conference proceedings
Brady, E., Zhong, Y., & Bigham, J. P. (2015) · Proceedings of the 12th International Web for All Conference · doi:10.1145/2745555.2746665 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
An Uninteresting Tour Through Why Our Research Papers Aren't Accessible
Bigham, J. P., Brady, E. L., Gleason, C., Guo, A., & Shamma, D. A. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2851581.2892588 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Towards accessible graphs in HTML-based scientific articles
Mirri, S., Peroni, S., Salomoni, P., Vitali, F., & Rubano, V. (2017) · 2017 14th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC) · doi:10.1109/ccnc.2017.7983287 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
User Control in Adaptive User Interfaces for Accessibility
Peißner, M., & Edlin-White, R. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40483-2_44 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
PDF Accessibility of Research Papers: What Tools are Needed for Assessment and Remediation?
Jembu Rajkumar, A., Lazar, J., Jordan, J. B., Darvishy, A., & Hutter, H.-P. (2020) · Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2020.512 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Spoken Mathematics Using Prosody, Earcons and Spearcons
Bates, E., & Fitzpatrick, D. (2010) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14100-3_61 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Skimming and Scanning Improvement: The Needs, Assumptions and Knowledge Base
Maxwell, M. J. (1972) · Journal of Reading Behavior · doi:10.1080/10862967209547021 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Ahmetovic, D., Armano, T., Bernareggi, C., Berra, M., Capietto, A., Coriasco, S., Murru, N., Ruighi, A., & Taranto, E. (2018) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3234695.3241029 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Making the field of computing more inclusive
Lazar, J., Churchill, E. F., Grossman, T., van der Veer, G., Palanque, P., Morris, J. "., & Mankoff, J. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2993420 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Neural caption generation over figures
Chen, C., Zhang, R., Kim, S., Cohen, S. D., Yu, T., Rossi, R. A., & Bunescu, R. (2019) · ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp) · doi:10.1145/3341162.3345601 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
A Formative Study on Designing Accurate and Natural Figure Captioning Systems
Qian, X., Koh, E., Du, F., Kim, S., & Chan, J. (2020) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3334480.3382946 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
PDF Accessibility: Tools and Challenges
Darvishy, A. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-94277-3_20 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Accessible images (AIMS): a model to build self-describing images for assisting screen reader users
Nengroo, A. S., & Kuppusamy, K. S. (2017) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-017-0607-z · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Table Region Detection on Large-scale PDF Files without Labeled Data.Preprint
Fan, M., & Kim, D. S. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Accessible bar charts for visually impaired users
Elzer, S., Schwartz, E. J., Carberry, S., Chester, D. L., Demir, Ş., & Wu, P. (2008) · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Publishing accessible proceedings: the DSAI 2016 case study
Ribera, M., Pozzobon, R., & Sayago, S. (2019) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-019-00660-3 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Estudio de la accesibilidad de los documentos científicos en soporte digital
Graells, M. T. I., Barrios, M., Boladeras, M. D., Murillo, D. G., Ponsa, P., & Ribera, M. (2008) · Revista española de Documentación Científica · doi:10.3989/redc.2008.4.651 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Towards Accessible Charts for Blind and Partially Sighted People
Engel, C., Gollasch, D., Branig, M., & Weber, G. (2017) · Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI) · doi:10.18420/muc2017-mci-0338 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
MathML to ASCII-Braille and Hierarchical Tree Converter
Fajardo-Flores, S. B., Andrade-Aréchiga, M., Flores-Barriga, A., & Lazaro-Flores, J. (2010) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14100-3_59 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Mankoff, J. C., Ross, A. S., Bennett, C. L., Spiel, K., Hofmann, M. K., & Rode, J. A. (2020) · ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing · doi:10.1145/3386280.3386287 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Nazemi, A., Murray, I. D., & McMeekin, D. A. (2014) · International Journal of Signal Processing Image Processing and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.14257/ijsip.2014.7.4.03 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Improving the user interface for people with disabilities
Thompson, T. (2014) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/2559206.2567823 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
How science should support researchers with visual impairments
Sahtout, N. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-020-02627-4 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Accessibility Issues in Digital Mathematical Libraries
Sojka, P., Růžička, M., Kucbel, M., & Jarmar, M. (2013) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [14][14] Christin Engel, E. Müller, and G. Weber. 2019. SVGPlott: an accessible tool to generate highly adaptable, accessible audio-tactile charts for and from blind and visually impaired people. Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (2019). -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fan, D., Fay Siu, A., Rao, H., Kim, G. S.-H., Vazquez, X., Greco, L., O'Modhrain, S., & Follmer, S. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing · doi:10.1145/3557899 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“Like previous studies exploring HTML-based screen reader accessible charts, we observe the importance of page structure when situating a visualization and simplifying navigation between visualization and supporting information [123].”
MethodVILA: Improving Structured Content Extraction from Scientific PDFs Using Visual Layout Groups
Shen, Z., Lo, K., Wang, L. L., Kuehl, B., Weld, D. S., & Downey, D. (2022) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00466 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationChintalapati, S. S., Bragg, J., & Wang, L. L. (2022) · Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3517428.3544796 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationPapeos: Augmenting Research Papers with Talk Videos
Kim, T. S., Latzke, M., Bragg, J., Zhang, A. X., & Chang, J. C. (2023) · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) · doi:10.1145/3586183.3606770 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationDebashish, P., Rajput, T., Rajkumar, A. J., Lazar, J. K., Jain, R., Morariu, V. I., & Manjunatha, V. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing · doi:10.1145/3507661 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Lo, K., Shen, Z., Newman, B., Chang, J., Authur, R., Bransom, E., Candra, S., Chandrasekhar, Y., Huff, R., Kuehl, B., et al. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-demo.45 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationAli, A., Khusro, S., & Alahmadi, T. J. (2024) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.2599 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Okarma, K., & Lech, P. (2023) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106330 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Schmitt-Koopmann, F. M., Huang, E. M., Hutter, H.-P., & Darvishy, A. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713084 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Unfortunately, research has shown that only a tiny percentage of the trillions of PDF documents available are accessible for individuals who use screen readers and meet the PDF Universal Access (UA) standard [45].”
The state of scientific PDF accessibility in repositories: A survey in Switzerland
Darvishy, A., Sethe, R., Engler, I., Pierrès, O., & Manning, J. (2023) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1002/leap.1581 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Paper to HTML: A Publicly Available Web Tool for Converting Scientific Pdfs into Accessible HTML
Wang, L. L., Bragg, J., & Weld, D. S. (2022) · ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing · doi:10.1145/3582298.3582299 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationYu, Y., Ryskeldiev, B., Tsutsui, A., Gillingham, M., & Wang, Y. (2025) · Proceedings of the 27th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3663547.3746353 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Accessible Technology Course Design Practices for Inclusivity in Nursing Education
Kotcherlakota, S., Rejda, P., Stamler, L. L., & Kupzyk, K. A. (2023) · Nurse Educator · doi:10.1097/nne.0000000000001497 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Key Issues Affecting the Inclusion of Alt Text in Scholarly PDF Publications
Richard, B. (2023) · Logos · doi:10.1163/18784712-03104058 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
FormA11y - A tool for remediating PDF forms for accessibility
Paliwal, S., Hoeflich, J., Jordan, J. B., Jain, R., Morariu, V. I., Siu, A. F., & Lazar, J. K. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3702317 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Widespread lack of article accessibility policies among ecology and evolution journals
Smith, O. M., Jeffery, B. E., Leuenberger, W., Mack, C., Pizzo, G. M., Zhang, B., & Davis, C. L. (2025) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-025-02694-8 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
A Hybrid Approach to Typo Correction in Indonesian Documents Using Levenshtein Distance
Santoso, J. T., & Song, Y. (2024) · Journal of Technology Informatics and Engineering · doi:10.51903/jtie.v3i2.184 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Khan, O., & Seo, J. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791242 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“This bias becomes especially insidious given pervasive accessibility failures in publishing [9, 76], creating a vicious cycle where inaccessible dissemination reinforces visual privilege in evaluation.”
iTagPDF: Towards Finally Automating PDF Accessibility
Mowar, P., Steinfeld, A., & Bigham, J. P. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790289 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Maximizing Equitable Reach and Accessibility of ETDs
Ingram, W. A., Wu, J. F., & Fox, E. A. (2023) · ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries · doi:10.1109/jcdl57899.2023.00049 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Accessibility worsens for blind and low-vision readers of academic PDFs
Singh Chawla, D. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-024-03953-7 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Mulliken, A., Vite, D., & Abrahamsson, M. (2026) · Information Technology and Libraries · doi:10.5860/ital.v45i2.17502
Auto-CORPus: a natural language processing tool for standardising and reusing biomedical literature
Beck, T., Shorter, T., Hu, S., Li, Z., Sun, S., Popovici, C. M., McQuibban, N., Makraduli, F., Yeung, C. S., Rowlands, T., et al. (2022) · Spiral (Imperial College London) · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2022.788124
The state of scientific PDF accessibility in repositories: A survey in SwitzerlandPreprint
Darvishy, A., Sethe, R., Engler, I., Pierrès, O., & Manning, J. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.14041
- Authors
- Wang, L. L., Cachola, I., Bragg, J., Cheng, E. Y.-Y., Haupt, C., Latzke, M., Kuehl, B., van Zuylen, M., Wagner, L., & Weld, D. S.
- Affiliations
- Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2105.00076
- OpenAlex
- W3159933103
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2040196)
- University of Washington
- Office of Naval Research (N00014- 18-1-2193, N00014-18, N00014)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text Readability and Simplification
- Keywords
- PDF accessibility, scientific documents, blind and visually impaired users, screen readers, user needs, accessibility evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
