PreprintCited by 4Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsArtificial Intelligence in GamesAdvanced Bandit Algorithms Research

Towards Practical Credit Assignment for Deep Reinforcement Learning

Open access
Alipov, Vyacheslav, Simmons-Edler, Riley, Putintsev, Nikita, Kalinin, Pavel, Vetrov, Dmitry·2021·arXiv

Abstract

Credit assignment is a fundamental problem in reinforcement learning, the problem of measuring an action's influence on future rewards. Explicit credit assignment methods have the potential to boost the performance of RL algorithms on many tasks, but thus far remain impractical for general use. Recently, a family of methods called Hindsight Credit Assignment (HCA) was proposed, which explicitly assign credit to actions in hindsight based on the probability of the action having led to an observed outcome. This approach has appealing properties, but remains a largely theoretical idea applicable to a limited set of tabular RL tasks. Moreover, it is unclear how to extend HCA to deep RL environments. In this work, we explore the use of HCA-style credit in a deep RL context. We first describe the limitations of existing HCA algorithms in deep RL that lead to their poor performance or complete lack of training, then propose several theoretically-justified modifications to overcome them. We explore the quantitative and qualitative effects of the resulting algorithm on the Arcade Learning Environment (ALE) benchmark, and observe that it improves performance over Advantage Actor-Critic (A2C) on many games where non-trivial credit assignment is necessary to achieve high scores and where hindsight probabilities can be accurately estimated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2106.04499

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The extreme long-horizon in BEHAVIOR-1K activities causes the visuomotor control (RL-VMC) policy to fail in all three activities.

    “The extreme long-horizon in our activities causes the visuomotor control (RL-VMC) policy to fail in all three activities, potentially due to problems such as credit assignment [65], deep exploration [66, 67], and vanishing gradients [68] as reported by prior works.”
  • The failure of RL-VMC may be due to problems such as credit assignment, deep exploration, and vanishing gradients.

    “The extreme long-horizon in our activities causes the visuomotor control (RL-VMC) policy to fail in all three activities, potentially due to problems such as credit assignment [65], deep exploration [66, 67], and vanishing gradients [68] as reported by prior works.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Brockman, G., Cheung, V., Pettersson, L., Schneider, J., Schulman, J., Tang, J., and Zaremba, W. Openai gym, 2016. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1606. 01540 . cite arxiv:1606.01540. · arXiv
  2. Harutyunyan, A., Dabney, W., Mesnard, T., Azar, M. G., Piot, B., Heess, N., van Hasselt, H., Wayne, G., Singh, S., Precup, D., and Munos, R. Hindsight credit assignment. In Wallach, H. M., Larochelle, H., Beygelzimer, A., d'Alch´ e Buc, F., Fox, E. B., and Garnett, R. (eds.), NeurIPS , pp. 12467-12476, 2019. URL http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/ nips/nips2019.html#HarutyunyanDMAP19 .
  3. Venuto, D., Lau, E., Precup, D., and Nachum, O. Policy gradients incorporating the future. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.02096 , 2021. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alipov, V., Simmons-Edler, R., Putintsev, N., Kalinin, P., & Vetrov, D.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3173051288
Cited by
3
References
18
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
Keywords
credit assignment, deep reinforcement learning, Advantage Actor-Critic, Arcade Learning Environment, game-playing agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review