PreprintCited by 512Speech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and Audio ProcessingSpeech and dialogue systems

SpeechBrain: A General-Purpose Speech Toolkit

Open access
Ravanelli, Mirco, Parcollet, Titouan, Plantinga, Peter, Rouhe, Aku, Cornell, Samuele, Lugosch, Loren, Subakan, Cem, Dawalatabad, Nauman +13 more·2021·arXiv

Abstract

SpeechBrain is an open-source and all-in-one speech toolkit. It is designed to facilitate the research and development of neural speech processing technologies by being simple, flexible, user-friendly, and well-documented. This paper describes the core architecture designed to support several tasks of common interest, allowing users to naturally conceive, compare and share novel speech processing pipelines. SpeechBrain achieves competitive or state-of-the-art performance in a wide range of speech benchmarks. It also provides training recipes, pretrained models, and inference scripts for popular speech datasets, as well as tutorials which allow anyone with basic Python proficiency to familiarize themselves with speech technologies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2106.04624

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most end-to-end speaker recognition models have degraded performance compared to models using manual features, while the widely adopted ECAPA-TDNN model and its variants enable an EER below 1%.

    “Most end-to-end speaker recognition models have degraded performance compared to models using manual features, while the widely adopted ECAPA-TDNN model and its variants [22,23] enable an EER below 1%.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 94

  1. [1][1] S. Young, G. Evermann, T. Hain, D. Kershaw, G. Moore, J. Odell, D. Ollason, D. Povey, V. Valtchev, and P. Woodland. The HTK Book . Entropic Cambridge Research Laboratory, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2002. -
  2. [2][2] D. Huggins-Daines, M. Kumar, A. Chan, A. W. Black, M. Ravishankar, and A. I. Rudnicky. Pocketsphinx: A free, real-time continuous speech recognition system for hand-held devices. In in Proc. of ICASSP , 2006. -
  3. [3][3] A. Lee, T. Kawahara, and K. Shikano. Julius: An open source realtime large vocabulary recognition engine. In Proc. of EUROSPEECH , 2001. -
  4. [4][4] D. Rybach, S. Hahn, P. Lehnen, D. Nolden, M. Sundermeyer, Z. Tüske, S. Wiesler, R. Schlüter, and H. Ney. RASR - The RWTH Aachen University Open Source Speech Recognition Toolkit. In Proc. of ASRU , 2011. -
  5. [5][5] D. Povey et al. The Kaldi Speech Recognition Toolkit. In Proc. of ASRU , 2011. -
  6. [6][6] M. Abadi, P. Barham, J. Chen, Z. Chen, A. Davis, J. Dean, M. Devin, S. Ghemawat, G. Irving, M. Isard, M. Kudlur, J. Levenberg, R. Monga, S. Moore, D. G. Murray, B. Steiner, P. Tucker, V. Vasudevan, P. Warden, M. Wicke, Y. Yu, and X. Zheng. Tensorflow: A system for largescale machine learning. In Proc. of. USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation , 2016. -
  7. [7][7] A. Paszke, S. Gross, F. Massa, A. Lerer, J. Bradbury, G. Chanan, T. Killeen, Z. Lin, N. Gimelshein, L. Antiga, A. Desmaison, A. Kopf, E. Yang, Z. DeVito, M. Raison, A. Tejani, S. Chilamkurthy, B. Steiner, L. Fang, J. Bai, and S. Chintala. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In Proc. of NeurIPS , 2019. -
  8. [8][8] A. Hannun, C. Case, J. Casper, B. Catanzaro, G. Diamos, E. Elsen, R. Prenger, S. Satheesh, S. Sengupta, A. Coates, and A. Y. Ng. Deep speech: Scaling up end-to-end speech recognition, 2014. arXiv:1412.5567. - · arXiv
  9. [9][9] A. Zeyer, T. Alkhouli, and H. Ney. RETURNN as a generic flexible neural toolkit with application to translation and speech recognition. In Proc. of ACML , 2018. -
  10. [10][10] M. Ravanelli, T. Parcollet, and Y. Bengio. The PyTorch-Kaldi Speech Recognition Toolkit. In Proc. of ICASSP , 2019. -
  11. [11][11] Y. Wang, T. Chen, H. Xu, S. Ding, H. Lv, Y. Shao, N. Peng, L. Xie, S. Watanabe, and S. Khudanpur. Espresso: A fast end-to-end neural speech recognition toolkit. In Proc. of ASRU , 2019. -
  12. [12][12] J. Shen, P. Nguyen, Y. Wu, Z. Chen, M. X. Chen, Y. Jia, A. Kannan, T. Sainath, Y. Cao, C. Chiu, et al. Lingvo: A modular and scalable framework for sequence-to-sequence modeling. 2019. arXiv:1902.08295. - · arXiv
  13. [13][13] M. Ott, S. Edunov, A. Baevski, A. Fan, S. Gross, N. Ng, D. Grangier, and M. Auli. Fairseq: A fast, extensible toolkit for sequence modeling, 2019. arXiv:1904.01038. - · arXiv
  14. [14][14] S. Watanabe, T. Hori, S. Karita, T. Hayashi, J. Nishitoba, Y. Unno, N. Soplin, J. Heymann, M. Wiesner, N. Chen, A. Renduchintala, and T. Ochiai. ESPnet: End-to-end speech processing toolkit. In Proc. of Interspeech , 2018. -
  15. [15][15] O. Kuchaiev, J. Li, H. Nguyen, O. Hrinchuk, R. Leary, B. Ginsburg, S. Kriman, S. Beliaev, V. Lavrukhin, J. Cook, P. Castonguay, M. Popova, J. Huang, and J. M. Cohen. NeMo: a toolkit for building AI applications using Neural Modules, 2019. arXiv:1909.09577. - · arXiv
  16. [16][16] M. Pariente, S. Cornell, J. Cosentino, S. Sivasankaran, E. Tzinis, J. Heitkaemper, M. Olvera, F. Stöter, M. Hu, J. M. Martín-Doñas, D. Ditter, A. Frank, A. Deleforge, and E. Vincent. Asteroid: the PyTorch-based audio source separation toolkit for researchers. In Proc. of Interspeech , 2020. -
  17. [17][17] H. Bredin, R. Yin, J. M. Coria, G. Gelly, P. Korshunov, M. Lavechin, D. Fustes, H. Titeux, W. Bouaziz, and M. Gill. pyannote.audio: neural building blocks for speaker diarization. In Proc. of ICASSP , 2020. -
  18. [18][18] A. Larcher, K. A. Lee, and S. Meignier. An extensible speaker identification sidekit in python. In Proc. of ICASSP , 2016. -
  19. [20][20] Z. Wang and D. Wang. A joint training framework for robust automatic speech recognition. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing , 24(4):796-806, 2016. -
  20. [21][21] Z. Chen, S. Watanabe, H. Erdogan, and J.R. Hershey. Speech enhancement and recognition using multi-task learning of long short-term memory recurrent neural networks. In Proc. of Interspeech , 2015. -
  21. [22][22] T. Gao, J. Du, L. Dai, and C. Lee. Joint training of front-end and back-end deep neural networks for robust speech recognition. In Proc. of ICASSP , 2015. -
  22. [23][23] M. Ravanelli, P. Brakel, M. Omologo, and Y. Bengio. Batch-normalized joint training for DNN-based distant speech recognition. In Proc. of SLT , 2016. -
  23. [25][25] A. Graves. Sequence transduction with recurrent neural networks. ICML - Workshop on Representation Learning , 2012. -
  24. [26][26] S. Watanabe, T. Hori, S. Kim, J. R. Hershey, and T. Hayashi. Hybrid ctc/attention architecture for end-to-end speech recognition. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing , 11 (8):1240-1253, 2017. -
  25. [29][29] R. Ardila, M. Branson, K. Davis, M. Henretty, M. Kohler, J. Meyer, R. Morais, L. Saunders, F. M. Tyers, and G. Weber. Common Voice: a massively-multilingual speech corpus. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2020) , 2020. -
  26. [32][32] D. Snyder, D. Garcia-Romero, G. Sell, D. Povey, and S. Khudanpur. X-vectors: Robust DNN embeddings for speaker recognition. In Proc. of ICASSP , 2018. -
  27. [33][33] B. Desplanques, J. Thienpondt, and K. Demuynck. ECAPA-TDNN: emphasized channel attention, propagation and aggregation in TDNN based speaker verification. In Proc. of Interspeech , 2020. -
  28. [36][36] U. Luxburg. A tutorial on spectral clustering. Statistics and Computing , 17(4), 2007. -
  29. [37][37] N. Dawalatabad, M. Ravanelli, F. Grondin, J. Thienpondt, B. Desplanques, and H. Na. ECAPATDNN embeddings for speaker diarization, 2021. arXiv:2104.01466. - · arXiv
  30. [38][38] J. Carletta, S. Ashby, S. Bourban, M. Flynn, M. Guillemot, T. Hain, J. Kadlec, V. Karaiskos, W. Kraaij, M. Kronenthal, G. Lathoud, M. Lincoln, A. Lisowska, I. McCowan, W. Post, D. Reidsma, and P. Wellner. The AMI meeting corpus: A pre-announcement. In Proc. of the Second International Conference on Machine Learning for Multimodal Interaction , 2006. -
  31. [39][39] S. Fu, C. Yu, T. Hsieh, P. Plantinga, M. Ravanelli, X. Lu, and Y. Tsao. MetricGAN+: An Improved Version of MetricGAN for Speech Enhancement. 2021. arXiv:2104.03538. - · arXiv
  32. [40][40] D. Bagchi, P. Plantinga, A. Stiff, and E. Fosler-Lussier. Spectral feature mapping with mimic loss for robust speech recognition. In Proc. of ICASSP , 2018. -
  33. [41][41] C. Veaux, J. Yamagishi, and S. King. The voice bank corpus: Design, collection and data analysis of a large regional accent speech database. In International Conference Oriental COCOSDA held jointly with Conference on Asian Spoken Language Research and Evaluation (O-COCOSDA/CASLRE) , 2013. -
  34. [42][42] C. Reddy, V. Gopal, R. Cutler, E. Beyrami, R. Cheng, H. Dubey, S. Matusevych, R. Aichner, A. Aazami, S. Braun, P. Rana, S. Srinivasan, and J. Gehrke. The interspeech 2020 deep noise suppression challenge: Datasets, subjective testing framework, and challenge results. In Proc. of Interspeech , 2020. -
  35. [43][43] Y. Luo and N. Mesgarani. Conv-tasnet: Surpassing ideal time-frequency magnitude masking for speech separation. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing , 27(8):1256-1266, 2019. -
  36. [44][44] Y. Luo, Z. Chen, and T. Yoshioka. Dual-path RNN: efficient long sequence modeling for time-domain single-channel speech separation, 2020. arXiv:1910.06379. - · arXiv
  37. [45][45] C. Subakan, M. Ravanelli, S. Cornell, M. Bronzi, and J. Zhong. Attention is all you need in speech separation. In Proc. of ICASSP , 2021. -
  38. [46][46] J. Hershey, Z. Chen, J. Le Roux, and S. Watanabe. Deep clustering: Discriminative embeddings for segmentation and separation. In Proc. of ICASSP , 2016. -
  39. [47][47] G. Wichern, J. Antognini, M. Flynn, L. Zhu, E. McQuinn, D. Crow, E. Manilow, and J. Le Roux. WHAM!: extending speech separation to noisy environments. In Proc. of Interspeech , 2019. -
  40. [48][48] M. Maciejewski, G. Wichern, E. McQuinn, and J. Le Roux. Whamr!: Noisy and reverberant single-channel speech separation. In Proc. of ICASSP , 2020. -
  41. [49][49] J. Cosentino, M. Pariente, S. Cornell, A. Deleforge, and E. Vincent. Librimix: An open-source dataset for generalizable speech separation, 2020. arXiv:2005.11262. - · arXiv
  42. [50][50] L. Lugosch, P. Papreja, M. Ravanelli, A. Heba, and T. Parcollet. Timers and Such: A practical benchmark for spoken language understanding with numbers. CoRR , abs/2104.01604, 2021. - · arXiv
  43. [51][51] P. Haghani, A. Narayanan, M. Bacchiani, G. Chuang, N. Gaur, P. Moreno, R. Prabhavalkar, Z. Qu, and A. Waters. From Audio to Semantics: Approaches to end-to-end spoken language understanding. IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT) , 2018. -
  44. [52][52] D. Serdyuk, Y. Wang, C. Fuegen, A. Kumar, B. Liu, and Y. Bengio. Towards end-to-end spoken language understanding. In Proc. of ICASSP , 2018. -
  45. [53][53] E. Bastianelli, A. Vanzo, P. Swietojanski, and V. Rieser. SLURP: A Spoken Language Understanding Resource Package. In Proc. of EMNLP , 2020. -
  46. [54][54] L. Lugosch, M. Ravanelli, P. Ignoto, V. Tomar, and Y. Bengio. Speech model pre-training for end-to-end spoken language understanding. In Proc. of Interspeech , 2019. -
  47. [55][55] E. Habets, J. Benesty, I. Cohen, S. Gannot, and J. Dmochowski. New insights into the MVDR beamformer in room acoustics. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing , 18(1):158-170, 2009. -
  48. [56][56] J. Heymann, L. Drude, and R. Haeb-Umbach. Neural network based spectral mask estimation for acoustic beamforming. In Proc. of ICASSP , 2016. -
  49. [58][58] M. Cobos, A. Marti, and J. Lopez. A modified SRP-PHAT functional for robust real-time sound source localization with scalable spatial sampling. IEEE Signal Processing Letters , 18 (1):71-74, 2010. -
  50. [59][59] R. Schmidt. Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation. IEEE transactions on antennas and propagation , 34(3):276-280, 1986. -
  51. [61][61] A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. In Proc. of NeurIPS , 2017. -
  52. [62][62] A. Baevski, Y. Zhou, A. Mohamed, and M. Auli. wav2vec 2.0: A framework for self-supervised learning of speech representations. In Proc. of NeurIPS , 2020. -
  53. [63][63] J. Li, V . Lavrukhin, B. Ginsburg, R. Leary, O. Kuchaiev, J. M. Cohen, H. Nguyen, and R. Teja Gadde. Jasper: An end-to-end convolutional neural acoustic model. In Proc. of Interspeech , 2019. -
  54. [64][64] S. Kriman, S. Beliaev, B. Ginsburg, J. Huang, O. Kuchaiev, V. Lavrukhin, R. Leary, J. Li, and Y. Zhang. Quartznet: Deep automatic speech recognition with 1d time-channel separable convolutions. In Proc. of ICASSP , 2020. -
  55. [65][65] S. Majumdar, J. Balam, O. Hrinchuk, V. Lavrukhin, V. Noroozi, and B. Ginsburg. Citrinet: Closing the gap between non-autoregressive and autoregressive end-to-end models for automatic speech recognition, 2021. arXiv:2104.01721. - · arXiv
  56. [66][66] G. Fairbanks, D. Garlan, and W. Scherlis. Design fragments make using frameworks easier. SIGPLAN Not. , 41(10), 2006. -
  57. [67][67] T. Wolf, L. Debut, V. Sanh, J. Chaumond, C. Delangue, A. Moi, P. Cistac, T. Rault, R. Louf, M. Funtowicz, J. Davison, S. Shleifer, P. von Platen, C. Ma, Y . Jernite, J. Plu, C. Xu, T. Le Scao, S. Gugger, M. Drame, Q. Lhoest, and A. Rush. Transformers: State-of-the-art natural language processing. In Proc of EMNLP , 2020. -
  58. [68][68] E. Variani, T. Bagby, E. McDermott, and M. Bacchiani. End-to-end training of acoustic models for large vocabulary continuous speech recognition with tensorflow. In Proc. of Interspeech , 2017. -
  59. [69][69] M. Morishita, Y. Oda, G. Neubig, K. Yoshino, K. Sudoh, and S. Nakamura. An empirical study of mini-batch creation strategies for neural machine translation. In Proc. of the WNMT , 2017. -
  60. [70][70] F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, et al. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python. the Journal of machine Learning research , 12:2825-2830, 2011. -
  61. [71][71] P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, David Cournapeau, Evgeni Burovski, Pearu Peterson, Warren Weckesser, Jonathan Bright, et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nature methods , 17(3):261-272, 2020. -
  62. [73][73] J. Howard and S. Gugger. Fastai: A layered api for deep learning. Information , 11(2):108, 2020. -
  63. [75][75] I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio. Generative adversarial nets. Proc. of NIPS , 2014. -
  64. [76][76] D. Park, W. Chan, Y. Zhang, C. Chiu, B. Zoph, E. Cubuk, and Q. Le. SpecAugment: A Simple Data Augmentation Method for Automatic Speech Recognition. In Proc. of Interspeech , 2019. -
  65. [77][77] A. Graves and N. Jaitly. End-to-end speech recognition with recurrent neural networks. In Proc. of ICML , 2014. -
  66. [79][79] J. Chung, Ç. Gülçehre, K. Cho, and Y. Bengio. Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. In Proc. of NIPS , 2014. -
  67. [80][80] M. Ravanelli, P. Brakel, M. Omologo, and Y. Bengio. Light gated recurrent units for speech recognition. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence , 2(2): 92-102, 2018. -
  68. [81][81] T. Kudo and J. Richardson. SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for neural text processing. In Proc. of EMNLP , 2018. -
  69. [82][82] J. Kahn, M. Rivière, W. Zheng, E. Kharitonov, Q. Xu, P. Mazaré, J. Karadayi, V. Liptchinsky, R. Collobert, C. Fuegen, T. Likhomanenko, G. Synnaeve, A. Joulin, A. Mohamed, and E. Dupoux. Libri-light: A benchmark for ASR with limited or no supervision. CoRR , abs/1912.07875, 2019. - · arXiv
  70. [83][83] W. Han, Z. Zhang, Y. Zhang, J. Yu, C. Chiu, J. Qin, A. Gulati, R. Pang, and Y. Wu. Contextnet: Improving convolutional neural networks for automatic speech recognition with global context. 2020. arXiv:2005.03191. - · arXiv
  71. [84][84] S. Karita, N. Chen, T. Hayashi, T. Hori, H. Inaguma, Z. Jiang, M. Someki, N. Soplin, R. Yamamoto, X. Wang, S. Watanabe, T. Yoshimura, and W. Zhang. A comparative study on transformer vs rnn in speech applications. In Proc. of ASRU , 2019. -
  72. [85][85] P. Szyma´ nski, P. ˙ Zelasko, M. Morzy, A. Szymczak, M. ˙ Zyła-Hoppe, J. Banaszczak, L. Augustyniak, J. Mizgajski, and Y. Carmiel. WER we are and WER we think we are. In Proc. of EMNLP , 2020. -
  73. [86][86] T. Likhomanenko, Q. Xu, V. Pratap, P. Tomasello, J. Kahn, G. Avidov, R. Collobert, and G. Synnaeve. Rethinking evaluation in ASR: are our models robust enough? CoRR , abs/2010.11745, 2020. - · arXiv
  74. [87][87] H. Zeinali, S. Wang, A. Silnova, P. Matˇ ejka, and O. Plchot. But system description to voxceleb speaker recognition challenge 2019. In Proc. of The VoxCeleb Challange Workshop , 2019. -
  75. [88][88] M. Pal, M. Kumar, R. Peri, T. Park, S. Kim, C. Lord, S. Bishop, and S. Narayanan. Metalearning with latent space clustering in generative adversarial network for speaker diarization, 2020. arXiv:2007.09635. - · arXiv
  76. [89][89] F. Landini, J. Profant, M. Diez, and L. Burget. Bayesian HMM clustering of x-vector sequences (VBx) in speaker diarization: theory, implementation and analysis on standard tasks, 2020. arXiv:2012.14952. - · arXiv
  77. [90][90] C. Wang, M. Rivière, A. Lee, A. Wu, C. Talnikar, D. Haziza, M. Williamson, J. Pino, and E. Dupoux. Voxpopuli: A large-scale multilingual speech corpus for representation learning, semi-supervised learning and interpretation. arXiv:2101.00390 , 2021. - · arXiv
  78. [93][93] P. Kenny, T. Stafylakis, P. Ouellet, Md. J. Alam, and P. Dumouchel. PLDA for speaker verification with utterances of arbitrary duration. In Proc. of ICASSP , 2013. -
  79. [94][94] D. Garcia-Romero and C. Espy-Wilson. Analysis of i-vector length normalization in speaker recognition systems. In Proc. of Interspeech , 2011. -
  80. [95][95] A. Défossez, G. Synnaeve, and Y. Adi. Real time speech enhancement in the waveform domain. Proc. of Interspeech , 2020. -
  81. [97][97] C. Trabelsi, O. Bilaniuk, Y. Zhang, D. Serdyuk, S. Subramanian, J. Santos, S. Mehri, N. Rostamzadeh, Y. Bengio, and C. Pal. Deep complex networks. In Proc. of ICLR , 2018. -
  82. [98][98] T. Parcollet, M. Ravanelli, M. Morchid, G. Linarès, C. Trabelsi, R. De Mori, and Y. Bengio. Quaternion recurrent neural networks. In Proc. of ICLR , 2019. -
  83. [99][99] M. Mohri, F. Pereira, and M. Riley. Weighted finite-state transducers in speech recognition. Computer Speech and Language , 16(1):69-88, 2002. -
  84. [101][101] F. Hernandez, V. Nguyen, S. Ghannay, N. Tomashenko, and Y. Estève. TED-LIUM 3: Twice as much data and corpus repartition for experiments on speaker adaptation. In Proc. of SPECOM , 2018. -
  85. [102][102] C. Li, J. Shi, W. Zhang, A. Subramanian, X. Chang, N. Kamo, M. Hira, T. Hayashi, C. Böddeker, Z. Chen, and Shinji Watanabe. Espnet-se: End-to-end speech enhancement and separation toolkit designed for ASR integration. In Proc. of the IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop , 2021. -
  86. [103][103] H. Erdogan, J. Hershey, S. Watanabe, M. Mandel, and J. Le Roux. Improved MVDR beamforming using single-channel mask prediction networks. In Proc. of Interspeech , 2016. -
  87. [104][104] F. Grondin, J. Lauzon, J. Vincent, and F. Michaud. GEV beamforming supported by DOAbased masks generated on pairs of microphones. In Proc. of Interspeech , 2020. -
  88. [106][106] M. Omologo and P. Svaizer. Acoustic event localization using a crosspower-spectrum phase based technique. In Proc. of ICASSP , 1994. -
  89. [107][107] J. Du, Q. Wang, T. Gao, Y. Xu, L. Dai, and C. Lee. Robust speech recognition with speech enhanced deep neural networks. In Proc. of Interspeech , 2014. -
  90. [108][108] D. Bahdanau, K. Cho, and Y. Bengio. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. Proc. of ICLR , 2015. -
  91. [109][109] S. Seo, D. Kwak, and B. Lee. Integration of pre-trained networks with continuous token interface for end-to-end spoken language understanding. arXiv:2104.07253 , 2021. - · arXiv
  92. [111][111] A.W. Rix, J.G. Beerends, M.P. Hollier, and A.P. Hekstra. Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (pesq)-a new method for speech quality assessment of telephone networks and codecs. In Proc. of ICASSP , 2001. -
  93. [112][112] Y. Hu and P. Loizou. Evaluation of objective quality measures for speech enhancement. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing , 16(1):229-238, 2007. -
  94. [113][113] E. Vincent, R. Gribonval, and C. Fevotte. Performance measurement in blind audio source separation. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing , 14(4):1462-1469, 2006.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ravanelli, M., Parcollet, T., Plantinga, P., Rouhe, A., Cornell, S., Lugosch, L., Subakan, C., Dawalatabad, N., Heba, A., Zhong, J., Chou, J.-C., Yeh, S.-L., Fu, S.-W., Liao, C.-F., Rastorgueva, E., Grondin, F., Aris, W., Na, H., Gao, Y., De Mori, R., & Bengio, Y.
Affiliations
  • Laboratoire Informatique d'Avignon (FR)
  • Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute (CA)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Aalto University (FI)
  • Marche Polytechnic University (IT)
  • Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IN)
  • Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago (US)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Academia Sinica (TW)
  • Nvidia (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
  • Samsung (South Korea) (KR)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3167533889
Cited by
512
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 145 · 2023: 162 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
pre-trained models, speech dataset, open source software

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review